Detection, Classification, and Quantification of Nonlinear Distortions in Time-Varying Frequency Response Function Measurements

The class of nonlinear time-varying (NLTV) systems includes all possible systems and, hence, is difficult to identify. Still, when the nonlinearities are not too strong then, depending on the application, a linear model might be sufficient for approximating the true response. To quantify the approxi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement Vol. 70; pp. 1 - 14
Main Authors Hallemans, Noel, Pintelon, Rik, Zhu, Xinhua, Collet, Thomas, Claessens, Raf, Wouters, Benny, Hubin, Annick, Lataire, John
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York IEEE 2021
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0018-9456
1557-9662
DOI10.1109/TIM.2020.3018839

Cover

More Information
Summary:The class of nonlinear time-varying (NLTV) systems includes all possible systems and, hence, is difficult to identify. Still, when the nonlinearities are not too strong then, depending on the application, a linear model might be sufficient for approximating the true response. To quantify the approximation error of the linear model, detecting and quantifying the nonlinear behavior are of key importance. In this article, we propose a fully automated procedure for detecting, classifying, and quantifying the nonlinear distortions in the response, possibly subject to a trend, of a specific class of NLTV systems to odd random phase multisine excitations. The result is a measurement of the time-varying frequency response function together with uncertainty bounds due to noise and nonlinear distortions. The user only has to specify four integer numbers: an upper bound on: 1) the degree on the time-domain polynomial modeling of the trend; 2) the degree of the frequency-domain polynomial basis function; 3) the number of frequency-domain hyperbolic-like basis functions, all used for modeling the output spectrum; and 4) a quality measure-called degrees of freedom (dof)-of the noise variance estimate. Guidelines are provided for obtaining reasonable values for these upper bounds.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0018-9456
1557-9662
DOI:10.1109/TIM.2020.3018839