Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Nephrolithiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the current evidence regarding the role of super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP), which refers to a 7-Fr nephroscope placed through a tract sized 10-14 Fr, in treating renal stones and compare its outcomes with the standa...
Saved in:
| Published in | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) Vol. 14; no. 12; p. e32253 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
United States
Springer Nature B.V
06.12.2022
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 2168-8184 2168-8184 |
| DOI | 10.7759/cureus.32253 |
Cover
| Abstract | We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the current evidence regarding the role of super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP), which refers to a 7-Fr nephroscope placed through a tract sized 10-14 Fr, in treating renal stones and compare its outcomes with the standard mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) techniques. A systematic literature search was conducted on the Medline database via PubMed and SCOPUS until May 2022 to retrieve the relevant studies. The titles and abstracts of unique records were screened for eligibility, followed by the full-text screening of potentially eligible abstracts. Data extraction was performed by two independent reviewers. The risk of bias assessment was conducted based on the study design. Open Meta (Analyst) and Review Manager 5.4 were used to perform all analyses. A total of 14 studies (n = 4,323 patients) were included, with two randomized controlled trials, one single-arm trial, and 11 cohort studies. The stone-free rate (SFR) of SMP was 91.4%. The pooled analysis showed no significant difference between SFR in mini-PCNL (mean difference (MD) = 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) = (0.99, 1.06), p = 0.12) and flexible ureteroscopy (MD = 0.84, 95% CI = (0.4, 1.76), p = 0.65]. On the other hand, SMP had a better SFR rate when compared with retrograde intrarenal surgery (MD = 1.3, 95% CI = (1.01, 1.66), p = 0.04). The pooled mean operative time of SMP was 49.44 minutes (95% CI = (41, 57.88), p < 0.001), which was longer than mini-PCNL (MD = 1.92, p < 0.001) and shorter than ureteroscopy (MD = -17.17, p < 0.00001). In the SMP group, the postoperative complications included fever (>38°C), pain, and hematuria, with an incidence of 7.6%, 2.3%, and 3.4%, respectively. The mean length of hospital stay after SMP was 2.4 days (95% CI = (2.17, 2.7), p < 0.001). The current evidence suggests that SMP is a safe and effective technique in the management of renal stones in both children and adults. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the current evidence regarding the role of super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP), which refers to a 7-Fr nephroscope placed through a tract sized 10-14 Fr, in treating renal stones and compare its outcomes with the standard mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) techniques. A systematic literature search was conducted on the Medline database via PubMed and SCOPUS until May 2022 to retrieve the relevant studies. The titles and abstracts of unique records were screened for eligibility, followed by the full-text screening of potentially eligible abstracts. Data extraction was performed by two independent reviewers. The risk of bias assessment was conducted based on the study design. Open Meta (Analyst) and Review Manager 5.4 were used to perform all analyses. A total of 14 studies (n = 4,323 patients) were included, with two randomized controlled trials, one single-arm trial, and 11 cohort studies. The stone-free rate (SFR) of SMP was 91.4%. The pooled analysis showed no significant difference between SFR in mini-PCNL (mean difference (MD) = 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) = (0.99, 1.06), p = 0.12) and flexible ureteroscopy (MD = 0.84, 95% CI = (0.4, 1.76), p = 0.65]. On the other hand, SMP had a better SFR rate when compared with retrograde intrarenal surgery (MD = 1.3, 95% CI = (1.01, 1.66), p = 0.04). The pooled mean operative time of SMP was 49.44 minutes (95% CI = (41, 57.88), p < 0.001), which was longer than mini-PCNL (MD = 1.92, p < 0.001) and shorter than ureteroscopy (MD = -17.17, p < 0.00001). In the SMP group, the postoperative complications included fever (>38°C), pain, and hematuria, with an incidence of 7.6%, 2.3%, and 3.4%, respectively. The mean length of hospital stay after SMP was 2.4 days (95% CI = (2.17, 2.7), p < 0.001). The current evidence suggests that SMP is a safe and effective technique in the management of renal stones in both children and adults.We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the current evidence regarding the role of super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP), which refers to a 7-Fr nephroscope placed through a tract sized 10-14 Fr, in treating renal stones and compare its outcomes with the standard mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) techniques. A systematic literature search was conducted on the Medline database via PubMed and SCOPUS until May 2022 to retrieve the relevant studies. The titles and abstracts of unique records were screened for eligibility, followed by the full-text screening of potentially eligible abstracts. Data extraction was performed by two independent reviewers. The risk of bias assessment was conducted based on the study design. Open Meta (Analyst) and Review Manager 5.4 were used to perform all analyses. A total of 14 studies (n = 4,323 patients) were included, with two randomized controlled trials, one single-arm trial, and 11 cohort studies. The stone-free rate (SFR) of SMP was 91.4%. The pooled analysis showed no significant difference between SFR in mini-PCNL (mean difference (MD) = 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) = (0.99, 1.06), p = 0.12) and flexible ureteroscopy (MD = 0.84, 95% CI = (0.4, 1.76), p = 0.65]. On the other hand, SMP had a better SFR rate when compared with retrograde intrarenal surgery (MD = 1.3, 95% CI = (1.01, 1.66), p = 0.04). The pooled mean operative time of SMP was 49.44 minutes (95% CI = (41, 57.88), p < 0.001), which was longer than mini-PCNL (MD = 1.92, p < 0.001) and shorter than ureteroscopy (MD = -17.17, p < 0.00001). In the SMP group, the postoperative complications included fever (>38°C), pain, and hematuria, with an incidence of 7.6%, 2.3%, and 3.4%, respectively. The mean length of hospital stay after SMP was 2.4 days (95% CI = (2.17, 2.7), p < 0.001). The current evidence suggests that SMP is a safe and effective technique in the management of renal stones in both children and adults. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the current evidence regarding the role of super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP), which refers to a 7-Fr nephroscope placed through a tract sized 10-14 Fr, in treating renal stones and compare its outcomes with the standard mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) techniques.A systematic literature search was conducted on the Medline database via PubMed and SCOPUS until May 2022 to retrieve the relevant studies. The titles and abstracts of unique records were screened for eligibility, followed by the full-text screening of potentially eligible abstracts. Data extraction was performed by two independent reviewers. The risk of bias assessment was conducted based on the study design. Open Meta (Analyst) and Review Manager 5.4 were used to perform all analyses. A total of 14 studies (n = 4,323 patients) were included, with two randomized controlled trials, one single-arm trial, and 11 cohort studies.The stone-free rate (SFR) of SMP was 91.4%. The pooled analysis showed no significant difference between SFR in mini-PCNL (mean difference (MD) = 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) = (0.99, 1.06), p = 0.12) and flexible ureteroscopy (MD = 0.84, 95% CI = (0.4, 1.76), p = 0.65]. On the other hand, SMP had a better SFR rate when compared with retrograde intrarenal surgery (MD = 1.3, 95% CI = (1.01, 1.66), p = 0.04). The pooled mean operative time of SMP was 49.44 minutes (95% CI = (41, 57.88), p < 0.001), which was longer than mini-PCNL (MD = 1.92, p < 0.001) and shorter than ureteroscopy (MD = -17.17, p < 0.00001). In the SMP group, the postoperative complications included fever (>38°C), pain, and hematuria, with an incidence of 7.6%, 2.3%, and 3.4%, respectively. The mean length of hospital stay after SMP was 2.4 days (95% CI = (2.17, 2.7), p < 0.001).The current evidence suggests that SMP is a safe and effective technique in the management of renal stones in both children and adults. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the current evidence regarding the role of super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP), which refers to a 7-Fr nephroscope placed through a tract sized 10-14 Fr, in treating renal stones and compare its outcomes with the standard mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) techniques. A systematic literature search was conducted on the Medline database via PubMed and SCOPUS until May 2022 to retrieve the relevant studies. The titles and abstracts of unique records were screened for eligibility, followed by the full-text screening of potentially eligible abstracts. Data extraction was performed by two independent reviewers. The risk of bias assessment was conducted based on the study design. Open Meta (Analyst) and Review Manager 5.4 were used to perform all analyses. A total of 14 studies (n = 4,323 patients) were included, with two randomized controlled trials, one single-arm trial, and 11 cohort studies. The stone-free rate (SFR) of SMP was 91.4%. The pooled analysis showed no significant difference between SFR in mini-PCNL (mean difference (MD) = 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) = (0.99, 1.06), p = 0.12) and flexible ureteroscopy (MD = 0.84, 95% CI = (0.4, 1.76), p = 0.65]. On the other hand, SMP had a better SFR rate when compared with retrograde intrarenal surgery (MD = 1.3, 95% CI = (1.01, 1.66), p = 0.04). The pooled mean operative time of SMP was 49.44 minutes (95% CI = (41, 57.88), p < 0.001), which was longer than mini-PCNL (MD = 1.92, p < 0.001) and shorter than ureteroscopy (MD = -17.17, p < 0.00001). In the SMP group, the postoperative complications included fever (>38°C), pain, and hematuria, with an incidence of 7.6%, 2.3%, and 3.4%, respectively. The mean length of hospital stay after SMP was 2.4 days (95% CI = (2.17, 2.7), p < 0.001). The current evidence suggests that SMP is a safe and effective technique in the management of renal stones in both children and adults. |
| Author | Giri, Subhasis Narayanaswamy, Arun Abul, Fawzi Sridharan, Natrajan Almousawi, Shabir Zeid, Mohamed Jacob, Prem Thomas Sayedin, Hani Sarica, Kemal |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Mohamed surname: Zeid fullname: Zeid, Mohamed – sequence: 2 givenname: Hani surname: Sayedin fullname: Sayedin, Hani – sequence: 3 givenname: Natrajan surname: Sridharan fullname: Sridharan, Natrajan – sequence: 4 givenname: Arun surname: Narayanaswamy fullname: Narayanaswamy, Arun – sequence: 5 givenname: Fawzi surname: Abul fullname: Abul, Fawzi – sequence: 6 givenname: Prem Thomas surname: Jacob fullname: Jacob, Prem Thomas – sequence: 7 givenname: Subhasis surname: Giri fullname: Giri, Subhasis – sequence: 8 givenname: Kemal surname: Sarica fullname: Sarica, Kemal – sequence: 9 givenname: Shabir surname: Almousawi fullname: Almousawi, Shabir |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36620813$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNp9kElLxDAUgIMornPzLAUvHqwm6ZLE2yBu4IYz95JmXjHSNjWL0n9vx6oMgpLDC4_vbd8OWm9NCwjtE3zCWCZOVbAQ3ElCaZasoW1Kch5zwtP1lf8Wmjj3gjEmmFHM8CbaSvKcYk6SbVTOQgc2vtOtjh7BquBlCya46B66Z2tq7Z-NN00fVcau5LR02p1F02jWOw-N9FpFT_Cm4T2S7SK6Ay_jaSvrfsD20EYlaweTr7iL5pcX8_Pr-Pbh6uZ8ehsrypmPy4SIkpRC4BTzEli-EKpiC6iAUU5TJfKMMwIci5TkILHKAIjKSkJEsny7KB7bhraT_bus66KzupG2LwgulraK0VbxaWvgj0a-s-Y1gPNFo52Cuh4FFJTllBORUTqgh7_QFxPscN6SYoSmqeBL6uCLCmUDi5_p37IHgI6AssY5C1WhtB_UmdZbqeu_1jz-VfTvVR9VjaPe |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_21886_2308_6424_2024_12_2_87_107 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.07.047 10.7717/peerj.8532 10.1111/bju.12193 10.1155/2022/4733329 10.1007/s003450050083 10.1111/bju.15066 10.1089/end.2010.0424 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08496.x 10.1111/bju.14427 10.1007/s00345-021-03860-w 10.1111/bju.14969 10.1089/end.2018.0747 10.1089/end.2004.18.715 10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.029 10.1007/s00240-018-1068-4 10.1111/bju.15144 10.1007/s00383-021-04925-y 10.1159/000495514 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 10.1007/s00345-020-03150-x 10.1007/s00345-018-2197-7 10.1007/s00345-020-03263-3 10.1007/s00345-018-2465-6 10.5152/tud.2012.030 10.1111/bju.13242 10.1002/9781119536604 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | Copyright © 2022, Zeid et al. Copyright © 2022, Zeid et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2022, Zeid et al. – notice: Copyright © 2022, Zeid et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 3V. 7X7 7XB 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI 7X8 ADTOC UNPAY |
| DOI | 10.7759/cureus.32253 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition MEDLINE - Academic Unpaywall for CDI: Periodical Content Unpaywall |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic Publicly Available Content Database PubMed |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: UNPAY name: Unpaywall url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://unpaywall.org/ sourceTypes: Open Access Repository – sequence: 3 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518 sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine |
| EISSN | 2168-8184 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 10.7759/cureus.32253 36620813 10_7759_cureus_32253 |
| Genre | Journal Article Review |
| GroupedDBID | 53G 5VS 7X7 8FI 8FJ AAYXX ABUWG ADBBV AFKRA ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BCNDV BENPR BPHCQ BVXVI CCPQU CITATION FYUFA HMCUK HYE KQ8 M48 PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PUEGO RPM UKHRP ADRAZ ALIPV NPM 3V. 7XB 8FK AZQEC DWQXO K9. PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQUKI 7X8 ADTOC UNPAY |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-b319b1b990408be76d9cf7defe72824c965871e809416ea0c5ee1c5b11939393 |
| IEDL.DBID | M48 |
| ISSN | 2168-8184 |
| IngestDate | Sun Oct 26 02:48:50 EDT 2025 Thu Oct 02 06:54:57 EDT 2025 Tue Oct 07 07:12:15 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:00:02 EDT 2025 Wed Oct 01 02:02:08 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:57:18 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 12 |
| Keywords | mini-pcnl stone surgery pcnl urinary stones pediatric urinary stone disease super-mini pcnl |
| Language | English |
| License | Copyright © 2022, Zeid et al. cc-by |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c287t-b319b1b990408be76d9cf7defe72824c965871e809416ea0c5ee1c5b11939393 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Feature-3 ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://www.proquest.com/docview/2771244982?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication%&accountid=15518 |
| PMID | 36620813 |
| PQID | 2771244982 |
| PQPubID | 2045583 |
| ParticipantIDs | unpaywall_primary_10_7759_cureus_32253 proquest_miscellaneous_2762819522 proquest_journals_2771244982 pubmed_primary_36620813 crossref_citationtrail_10_7759_cureus_32253 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_32253 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2022-12-06 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2022-12-06 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2022 text: 2022-12-06 day: 06 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: Palo Alto |
| PublicationTitle | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Cureus |
| PublicationYear | 2022 |
| Publisher | Springer Nature B.V |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Springer Nature B.V |
| References | Zeng G (ref7) 2018; 122 Xu C (ref14) 2020; 8 Jia H (ref15) 2021; 39 Moher D (ref20) 2009; 6 Zeng G (ref5) 2016; 117 Yuan W (ref18) 2022; 2022 Wahab O (ref26) 2012; 38 Simayi A (ref11) 2019; 37 Zhong W (ref22) 2021; 39 Yuan D (ref9) 2019; 103 Alken P (ref21) 2020; 125 Fan J (ref10) 2019; 47 Giusti G (ref23) 2007; 51 Shah H (ref25) 2009; 104 Liu Y (ref8) 2018; 36 Welch VA (ref19) 2019 Liu Y (ref13) 2020; 126 Kukreja R (ref2) 2004; 18 Simayi A (ref16) 2021; 37 Desai J (ref3) 2013; 112 Guddeti RS (ref12) 2020; 126 Cai C (ref6) 2019; 33 Pillai SB (ref17) 2022; 40 Desai MR (ref4) 2011; 186 Jackman SV (ref24) 1998; 16 de la Rosette J (ref1) 2011; 25 |
| References_xml | – volume: 51 year: 2007 ident: ref23 article-title: Miniperc? No, thank you! publication-title: Eur Urol doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.07.047 – volume: 8 year: 2020 ident: ref14 article-title: A retrospective study comparing super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of 20-30 mm renal stones in obese patients publication-title: PeerJ doi: 10.7717/peerj.8532 – volume: 112 year: 2013 ident: ref3 article-title: Ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UMP): one more armamentarium publication-title: BJU Int doi: 10.1111/bju.12193 – volume: 2022 year: 2022 ident: ref18 article-title: Efficacy of super-mini-PCNL and ureteroscopy in kidney stone sufferers and risk factors of postoperative infection publication-title: J Healthc Eng doi: 10.1155/2022/4733329 – volume: 16 year: 1998 ident: ref24 article-title: The "mini-perc" technique: a less invasive alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy publication-title: World J Urol doi: 10.1007/s003450050083 – volume: 126 year: 2020 ident: ref13 article-title: Management of large renal stones with super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an international multicentre comparative study publication-title: BJU Int doi: 10.1111/bju.15066 – volume: 25 year: 2011 ident: ref1 article-title: The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients publication-title: J Endourol doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0424 – volume: 104 year: 2009 ident: ref25 article-title: Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: 3 years of experience with 454 patients publication-title: BJU Int doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08496.x – volume: 122 year: 2018 ident: ref7 article-title: Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) vs retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of 1-2 cm lower-pole renal calculi: an international multicentre randomised controlled trial publication-title: BJU Int doi: 10.1111/bju.14427 – volume: 40 year: 2022 ident: ref17 article-title: Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) vs retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in the management of renal calculi ≤ 2 cm: a propensity matched study publication-title: World J Urol doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03860-w – volume: 125 year: 2020 ident: ref21 article-title: Is supermini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy a new way forward? publication-title: BJU Int doi: 10.1111/bju.14969 – volume: 33 year: 2019 ident: ref6 article-title: The clinical application of new generation super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of ≥20 mm renal stones publication-title: J Endourol doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0747 – volume: 18 year: 2004 ident: ref2 article-title: Factors affecting blood loss during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: prospective study publication-title: J Endourol doi: 10.1089/end.2004.18.715 – volume: 186 year: 2011 ident: ref4 article-title: Single-step percutaneous nephrolithotomy (microperc): the initial clinical report publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.029 – volume: 47 year: 2019 ident: ref10 article-title: The role of super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) in the treatment of symptomatic lower pole renal stones (LPSs) after the failure of shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) publication-title: Urolithiasis doi: 10.1007/s00240-018-1068-4 – volume: 126 year: 2020 ident: ref12 article-title: Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) vs standard PCNL for the management of renal calculi of <2 cm: a randomised controlled study publication-title: BJU Int doi: 10.1111/bju.15144 – volume: 37 year: 2021 ident: ref16 article-title: Comparison of super-mini versus mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of upper urinary tract stones in children: a single centre experience publication-title: Pediatr Surg Int doi: 10.1007/s00383-021-04925-y – volume: 103 year: 2019 ident: ref9 article-title: Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy reduces the incidence of postoperative adverse events in pediatric patients: a retrospective cohort study publication-title: Urol Int doi: 10.1159/000495514 – volume: 6 year: 2009 ident: ref20 article-title: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement publication-title: PLoS Med doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 – volume: 39 year: 2021 ident: ref15 article-title: Comparison of super-mini-PCNL and flexible ureteroscopy for the management of upper urinary tract calculus (1-2 cm) in children publication-title: World J Urol doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03150-x – volume: 36 year: 2018 ident: ref8 article-title: Comparison of super-mini PCNL (SMP) versus Miniperc for stones larger than 2 cm: a propensity score-matching study publication-title: World J Urol doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2197-7 – volume: 39 year: 2021 ident: ref22 article-title: Enhanced super-mini-PCNL (eSMP): low renal pelvic pressure and high stone removal efficiency in a prospective randomized controlled trial publication-title: World J Urol doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03263-3 – volume: 37 year: 2019 ident: ref11 article-title: Clinical application of super-mini PCNL (SMP) in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones under ultrasound guidance publication-title: World J Urol doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2465-6 – volume: 38 year: 2012 ident: ref26 article-title: Tubeless PNL in the supine position publication-title: Turkish J Urol doi: 10.5152/tud.2012.030 – volume: 117 year: 2016 ident: ref5 article-title: Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP): a new concept in technique and instrumentation publication-title: BJU Int doi: 10.1111/bju.13242 – year: 2019 ident: ref19 article-title: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Second Edition doi: 10.1002/9781119536604 |
| SSID | ssj0001072070 |
| Score | 2.2203035 |
| SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
| Snippet | We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the current evidence regarding the role of super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy... |
| SourceID | unpaywall proquest pubmed crossref |
| SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
| StartPage | e32253 |
| SubjectTerms | Bias Clinical trials Hemoglobin Kidney stones Meta-analysis Pediatrics Postoperative period Software Systematic review Urogenital system Urological surgery |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: ProQuest Central dbid: BENPR link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3rS9xAEB_OE7R-KFVbe_YqK6hfSmqSS7IXQYoVRYQ7xAf4LexjDg-uuetdgvjfO5OXSqkE8iEZkmUeuzM7s78B2HPR2BB7mlP_6AQh3eIeSkeb2BuNKOSyBTr_YBhd3AWX9-F9C4b1WRguq6znxGKitlPDe-SHvpS8FMV9_9fsr8Ndozi7WrfQUFVrBXtcQIwtwbLPyFhtWP59Nry6ftl1caVPSl5WwEsZxocmn2O--Ml63Xu7Nv3jcK7Bap7O1NOjmkxeLULnn-Bj5T2Kk1Lc69DCdANWBlV-fBP0TT7DuTMYp2NxhXOTk-uHFNuLIZLQuNTtYZpN_zwJclVfPRurxXhxJE7ETYPrLMqkgVCpFQPMlFOjl3yG2_Oz29MLp-qi4BiKhjJHk5FpT9OqE7h9jTKysRlJiyOUFG4FhtFfpId9ivO8CJVrQkTPhNoj146vL9BOpyl-BWHpWaAMzUjaDYy1fcYWI6PWlrwKo0wHftTsS0yFMM6NLiYJRRrM7KRkdlIwuwP7DfWsRNb4D123lkRS2dciedGGDuw2r8kyON1RcpZooiJL6BPNVinB5ke9KPLJGaKPHzQifXcU2--P4ht88PlcBNe5RF1oZ_Mcv5O3kumdSgWfAZac7P4 priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest – databaseName: Unpaywall dbid: UNPAY link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3da9RAEB_qFdQ-1G-9WmUF9UX2Lt-b-HaIpQh3FNqD-hSyuxMaPJOQD0v713f28kFVFB8kkIfNJJvdndn5DbP7W4C3FirtoytN6h-559MtclFwqSI7TSnk0lt2_uUqOF57X8798x1YD3thCDFiQ73dVtj29H_lpkh0Pe-2csR9h85LnZLFWxRgmfjdNQc9ckdEvs-v8-oyEzMSuAO7gU8QfQK769XJ4qs5aM4OQk5OyusWwQvhR_O-MqPa7s_u6TfMuQf32rxMri6TzeaWHzp6AD-GFnTLT77N2kbO1PUv5I7_vYkPYb9HrmzRvfYIdjB_DHeXfW7-CcjTtsSKL7M8YydYqZZgJxZtzVZICmOW2V0UTfH9ihFMvlWWJXVWf2QLdjpySrMuYcGSXLMlNgkfmFOewtnR57NPx7w_wYErisQaLsnApS3J43lWKFEEOlKp0JiioFDPU4Z5RtgYUoxpB5hYyke0lS9tgpXmegaTvMjxBTBNZV6iaDaUlqe0Dg2vGU0oUhOiUYmawodh3GLVs5ubQzY2MUU5ZpTjrr_j7ShP4d0oXXasHn-QOxxUIO5tu44dIQwoikJnCm_Gx2SVJtXS9SzJBNsMpUMyzzvVGStyg8AhIEYffz_q0l__4uBfBV_CfcfszjCrbYJDmDRVi68IMzXydW8BNw2SGiU priority: 102 providerName: Unpaywall |
| Title | Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Nephrolithiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36620813 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2771244982 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2762819522 https://assets.cureus.com/uploads/review_article/pdf/100383/20230105-27955-znrwi7.pdf |
| UnpaywallVersion | publishedVersion |
| Volume | 14 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAFT databaseName: Open Access Digital Library customDbUrl: eissn: 2168-8184 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0001072070 issn: 2168-8184 databaseCode: KQ8 dateStart: 20150101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://grweb.coalliance.org/oadl/oadl.html providerName: Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries – providerCode: PRVAFT databaseName: Open Access Digital Library customDbUrl: eissn: 2168-8184 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0001072070 issn: 2168-8184 databaseCode: KQ8 dateStart: 20120101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://grweb.coalliance.org/oadl/oadl.html providerName: Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries – providerCode: PRVAQN databaseName: Pubmed customDbUrl: eissn: 2168-8184 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0001072070 issn: 2168-8184 databaseCode: RPM dateStart: 20120101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ providerName: National Library of Medicine – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Health & Medical Collection (Proquest) customDbUrl: eissn: 2168-8184 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0001072070 issn: 2168-8184 databaseCode: 7X7 dateStart: 20120101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Central customDbUrl: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518 eissn: 2168-8184 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0001072070 issn: 2168-8184 databaseCode: BENPR dateStart: 20120101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVFZP databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access customDbUrl: eissn: 2168-8184 dateEnd: 20250930 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0001072070 issn: 2168-8184 databaseCode: M48 dateStart: 20121101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://journals.scholarsportal.info providerName: Scholars Portal |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3da9tADBdtCm32MNa1W7Nl4QprX4Yzf5-9l5GVllJwCG0D2ZPx3SkskDqZY7Plv5_OX3R0HQaDz8I20sn6_ayzBPDRRKk8dIRO_aPherQLHeSGkKE1nxPlUmV1_mjsX0_dm5k324Gm22itwM0_qZ3uJzXNlsPfP7dfyeEJvw4598LPssiw2Az11HR2YY9iVKibOEQ10C-_tpjcNsvOcbblBwZFKbdaBf_kAl3Yd3zfpkjp_B2qnuDPF3BQpOtk-ytZLh_FpKtX8LIGk2xUWf8QdjB9DftRnS4_AnFXrDEzokW6YBPMZEFIEInqszGSDfXKtx-rfPWwZYRcH40tks1i84WN2F1b5plVOQSWpIpFmCdGU8zkGO6vLu8vro26qYIhiRzlhiCfE5agIOSagUDuq1DOucI5cmJfrtTFYLiFAdE-y8fElB6iJT1hEdLT2xvopKsUT4ApGnMTSS8oYbpSqUCXGiMfF4pAhkxkDz416otlXXBc971YxkQ8tN7jSu9xqfcenLXS66rQxjNy_cYScTNbYptzjVPCwO7BaXuaHEVnPyrNkoxfJg1tknlbWbC9UWPxHpy3Jv3vU7x79hLvoWvrPyT0ihe_D508K_AD4ZZcDGCXz_gA9r5djie3g3KC0tF0PBl9_wNycu97 |
| linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtR1da9RAcKgtWPsgatWeVl3B-iKx-d6LUKRqy9U2R7FXuLewH3P04Jqcl4RyP87_5my-Win2rQTysBk2y3ztzM7sDMAHG5UO0JMm9I-WH9Ar8pBbUkXOZEIul66q88fDcHDu_xwH4xX4096FMWmVrU6sFLXOlDkj33U5N1tR1He_zn9bpmuUia62LTRE01pB71UlxpqLHce4vCIXLt87-kH03nHdw4PR94HVdBmwFHkLhSWJCaUjSSv7dl8iD3WkJlzjBDm5I74y1VG4g33yg5wQha0CREcF0iHTxzw07QNY8z0_It9v7dvB8PTX9SGPzV2SqTrhnvMg2lXlAsv8sxEj79-t8JZ9uwHrZToXyysxm93Y8w6fwOPGWGX7NXc9hRVMn8HDuAnHb4I8K-e4sOJpOmWnuFAlWZqYlTkbIvGIyay7yIrscsnIMr4xNhX5NP_C9tlZV0aa1TEKJlLNYiyE1RZLeQ6j-0DnC1hNsxS3gGka84UiBShtX2ndN6XMSIdITUaMEqoHn1r0JaopaG76aswScmwMspMa2UmF7B7sdNDzupDHf-C2W0okjTjnyTXz9eB995kE0URXaswSTFgFJV2CeVlTsPuRF4Yu2V40-ceOpHeu4tXdq3gH64NRfJKcHA2PX8Mj11zJMCk24TasFosS35ChVMi3DTsySO5ZAP4CxKEogQ |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtR1da9RAcKgVan0QP-tp1RWsLxIv33spFCnWo7XeUWiFewvZ3QkenMl5SSj30_x3zuSrFbFvJZCHzbBZ5mtndmZnAN7ZqE2AnuLQP1p-QK_IQ2kpHTlpSi6XqavzT6bh8Xf_6yyYbcDv7i4Mp1V2OrFW1CbXfEY-dKXkrSgaucO0TYs4Oxp_Wv6yuIMUR1q7dhoNi5zi-pLct-Lg5Ihovee64y8Xn4-ttsOApclTKC1FDKgcRRrZt0cKZWginUqDKUpyRXzNlVGkgyPygZwQE1sHiI4OlENmDz807R24Kz0v4mxCOZNXxzu2dEmamlR7KYNoqKsVVsVHFiDv703wH8v2PtyrsmWyvkwWi2u73fghPGjNVHHY8NUj2MDsMWxN2kD8E1Dn1RJX1mSezcUZrnRFNibmVSGmSNzBOXU_8jL_uRZkE18bmyfFvNgXh-K8LyAtmuiESDIjJlgmVlcm5Slc3AYyn8Fmlmf4HIShMT_RpPqU7WtjRlzEjLSHMmS-6EQP4EOHvli3pcy5o8YiJpeGkR03yI5rZA9gr4deNiU8_gO321EibgW5iK_YbgBv-88kghxXaTBLMGEdjnQJZqehYP8jLwxdsrpo8vc9SW9cxYubV_EGtojt428n09OXsO3yXQzOrQl3YbNcVfiKLKRSva55UUB8y7z_B7HjJhs |
| linkToUnpaywall | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3da9RAEB_qFdQ-1G-9WmUF9UX2Lt-b-HaIpQh3FNqD-hSyuxMaPJOQD0v713f28kFVFB8kkIfNJJvdndn5DbP7W4C3FirtoytN6h-559MtclFwqSI7TSnk0lt2_uUqOF57X8798x1YD3thCDFiQ73dVtj29H_lpkh0Pe-2csR9h85LnZLFWxRgmfjdNQc9ckdEvs-v8-oyEzMSuAO7gU8QfQK769XJ4qs5aM4OQk5OyusWwQvhR_O-MqPa7s_u6TfMuQf32rxMri6TzeaWHzp6AD-GFnTLT77N2kbO1PUv5I7_vYkPYb9HrmzRvfYIdjB_DHeXfW7-CcjTtsSKL7M8YydYqZZgJxZtzVZICmOW2V0UTfH9ihFMvlWWJXVWf2QLdjpySrMuYcGSXLMlNgkfmFOewtnR57NPx7w_wYErisQaLsnApS3J43lWKFEEOlKp0JiioFDPU4Z5RtgYUoxpB5hYyke0lS9tgpXmegaTvMjxBTBNZV6iaDaUlqe0Dg2vGU0oUhOiUYmawodh3GLVs5ubQzY2MUU5ZpTjrr_j7ShP4d0oXXasHn-QOxxUIO5tu44dIQwoikJnCm_Gx2SVJtXS9SzJBNsMpUMyzzvVGStyg8AhIEYffz_q0l__4uBfBV_CfcfszjCrbYJDmDRVi68IMzXydW8BNw2SGiU |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Super-Mini+Percutaneous+Nephrolithotomy+for+Nephrolithiasis%3A+A+Systematic+Review+and+Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=Cur%C4%93us+%28Palo+Alto%2C+CA%29&rft.au=Zeid%2C+Mohamed&rft.au=Sayedin%2C+Hani&rft.au=Sridharan%2C+Natrajan&rft.au=Narayanaswamy%2C+Arun&rft.date=2022-12-06&rft.issn=2168-8184&rft.eissn=2168-8184&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e32253&rft_id=info:doi/10.7759%2Fcureus.32253&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F36620813&rft.externalDocID=36620813 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2168-8184&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2168-8184&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2168-8184&client=summon |