Deep Learning–Based ASPECTS Algorithm Enhances Reader Performance and Reduces Interpretation Time
ASPECTS is a long-standing and well-documented selection criterion for acute ischemic stroke treatment; however, the interpretation of ASPECTS is a challenging and time-consuming task for physicians with notable interobserver variabilities. We conducted a multireader, multicase study in which reader...
Saved in:
| Published in | American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR Vol. 46; no. 3; pp. 544 - 551 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
United States
04.03.2025
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 0195-6108 1936-959X 1936-959X |
| DOI | 10.3174/ajnr.A8491 |
Cover
| Abstract | ASPECTS is a long-standing and well-documented selection criterion for acute ischemic stroke treatment; however, the interpretation of ASPECTS is a challenging and time-consuming task for physicians with notable interobserver variabilities. We conducted a multireader, multicase study in which readers assessed ASPECTS without and with the support of a deep learning (DL)-based algorithm to analyze the impact of the software on clinicians' performance and interpretation time.
A total of 200 NCCT scans from 5 clinical sites (27 scanner models, 4 different vendors) were retrospectively collected. The reference standard was established through the consensus of 3 expert neuroradiologists who had access to baseline CTA and CTP data. Subsequently, 8 additional clinicians (4 typical ASPECTS readers and 4 senior neuroradiologists) analyzed the NCCT scans without and with the assistance of CINA-ASPECTS (Avicenna.AI), a DL-based, FDA-cleared, and CE-marked algorithm designed to compute ASPECTS automatically. Differences were evaluated in both performance and interpretation time between the assisted and unassisted assessments.
With software aid, readers demonstrated increased region-based accuracy from 72.4% to 76.5% (
< .05) and increased receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC AUC) from 0.749 to 0.788 (
< .05). Notably, all readers exhibited an improved ROC AUC when utilizing the software. Moreover, the use of the algorithm improved the score-based interobserver reliability and correlation coefficient of ASPECTS evaluation by 0.222 and 0.087 (
< .0001), respectively. Additionally, the readers' mean time spent analyzing a case was significantly reduced by 6% (
< .05) when aided by the algorithm.
With the assistance of the algorithm, readers' analyses were not only more accurate but also faster. Additionally, the overall ASPECTS evaluation exhibited greater consistency, fewer variabilities, and higher precision compared with the reference standard. This novel tool has the potential to enhance patient selection for appropriate treatment by enabling physicians to deliver accurate and timely diagnoses of acute ischemic stroke. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | ASPECTS is a long-standing and well-documented selection criterion for acute ischemic stroke treatment; however, the interpretation of ASPECTS is a challenging and time-consuming task for physicians with notable interobserver variabilities. We conducted a multireader, multicase study in which readers assessed ASPECTS without and with the support of a deep learning (DL)-based algorithm to analyze the impact of the software on clinicians' performance and interpretation time.BACKGROUND AND PURPOSEASPECTS is a long-standing and well-documented selection criterion for acute ischemic stroke treatment; however, the interpretation of ASPECTS is a challenging and time-consuming task for physicians with notable interobserver variabilities. We conducted a multireader, multicase study in which readers assessed ASPECTS without and with the support of a deep learning (DL)-based algorithm to analyze the impact of the software on clinicians' performance and interpretation time.A total of 200 NCCT scans from 5 clinical sites (27 scanner models, 4 different vendors) were retrospectively collected. The reference standard was established through the consensus of 3 expert neuroradiologists who had access to baseline CTA and CTP data. Subsequently, 8 additional clinicians (4 typical ASPECTS readers and 4 senior neuroradiologists) analyzed the NCCT scans without and with the assistance of CINA-ASPECTS (Avicenna.AI), a DL-based, FDA-cleared, and CE-marked algorithm designed to compute ASPECTS automatically. Differences were evaluated in both performance and interpretation time between the assisted and unassisted assessments.MATERIALS AND METHODSA total of 200 NCCT scans from 5 clinical sites (27 scanner models, 4 different vendors) were retrospectively collected. The reference standard was established through the consensus of 3 expert neuroradiologists who had access to baseline CTA and CTP data. Subsequently, 8 additional clinicians (4 typical ASPECTS readers and 4 senior neuroradiologists) analyzed the NCCT scans without and with the assistance of CINA-ASPECTS (Avicenna.AI), a DL-based, FDA-cleared, and CE-marked algorithm designed to compute ASPECTS automatically. Differences were evaluated in both performance and interpretation time between the assisted and unassisted assessments.With software aid, readers demonstrated increased region-based accuracy from 72.4% to 76.5% (P < .05) and increased receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC AUC) from 0.749 to 0.788 (P < .05). Notably, all readers exhibited an improved ROC AUC when utilizing the software. Moreover, the use of the algorithm improved the score-based interobserver reliability and correlation coefficient of ASPECTS evaluation by 0.222 and 0.087 (P < .0001), respectively. Additionally, the readers' mean time spent analyzing a case was significantly reduced by 6% (P < .05) when aided by the algorithm.RESULTSWith software aid, readers demonstrated increased region-based accuracy from 72.4% to 76.5% (P < .05) and increased receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC AUC) from 0.749 to 0.788 (P < .05). Notably, all readers exhibited an improved ROC AUC when utilizing the software. Moreover, the use of the algorithm improved the score-based interobserver reliability and correlation coefficient of ASPECTS evaluation by 0.222 and 0.087 (P < .0001), respectively. Additionally, the readers' mean time spent analyzing a case was significantly reduced by 6% (P < .05) when aided by the algorithm.With the assistance of the algorithm, readers' analyses were not only more accurate but also faster. Additionally, the overall ASPECTS evaluation exhibited greater consistency, fewer variabilities, and higher precision compared with the reference standard. This novel tool has the potential to enhance patient selection for appropriate treatment by enabling physicians to deliver accurate and timely diagnoses of acute ischemic stroke.CONCLUSIONSWith the assistance of the algorithm, readers' analyses were not only more accurate but also faster. Additionally, the overall ASPECTS evaluation exhibited greater consistency, fewer variabilities, and higher precision compared with the reference standard. This novel tool has the potential to enhance patient selection for appropriate treatment by enabling physicians to deliver accurate and timely diagnoses of acute ischemic stroke. ASPECTS is a long-standing and well-documented selection criterion for acute ischemic stroke treatment; however, the interpretation of ASPECTS is a challenging and time-consuming task for physicians with notable interobserver variabilities. We conducted a multireader, multicase study in which readers assessed ASPECTS without and with the support of a deep learning (DL)-based algorithm to analyze the impact of the software on clinicians' performance and interpretation time. A total of 200 NCCT scans from 5 clinical sites (27 scanner models, 4 different vendors) were retrospectively collected. The reference standard was established through the consensus of 3 expert neuroradiologists who had access to baseline CTA and CTP data. Subsequently, 8 additional clinicians (4 typical ASPECTS readers and 4 senior neuroradiologists) analyzed the NCCT scans without and with the assistance of CINA-ASPECTS (Avicenna.AI), a DL-based, FDA-cleared, and CE-marked algorithm designed to compute ASPECTS automatically. Differences were evaluated in both performance and interpretation time between the assisted and unassisted assessments. With software aid, readers demonstrated increased region-based accuracy from 72.4% to 76.5% ( < .05) and increased receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC AUC) from 0.749 to 0.788 ( < .05). Notably, all readers exhibited an improved ROC AUC when utilizing the software. Moreover, the use of the algorithm improved the score-based interobserver reliability and correlation coefficient of ASPECTS evaluation by 0.222 and 0.087 ( < .0001), respectively. Additionally, the readers' mean time spent analyzing a case was significantly reduced by 6% ( < .05) when aided by the algorithm. With the assistance of the algorithm, readers' analyses were not only more accurate but also faster. Additionally, the overall ASPECTS evaluation exhibited greater consistency, fewer variabilities, and higher precision compared with the reference standard. This novel tool has the potential to enhance patient selection for appropriate treatment by enabling physicians to deliver accurate and timely diagnoses of acute ischemic stroke. |
| Author | Tassy, Maxime Fogola, Sylvain Chaibi, Yasmina Quenet, Sarah Ayobi, Angela Chow, Daniel S. Davis, Adam Nael, Kambiz Shabe, Peter Fussell, David Chang, Peter D. Avare, Christophe |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Angela orcidid: 0000-0002-4351-6782 surname: Ayobi fullname: Ayobi, Angela – sequence: 2 givenname: Adam surname: Davis fullname: Davis, Adam – sequence: 3 givenname: Peter D. orcidid: 0000-0001-7645-7865 surname: Chang fullname: Chang, Peter D. – sequence: 4 givenname: Daniel S. orcidid: 0000-0002-2359-7394 surname: Chow fullname: Chow, Daniel S. – sequence: 5 givenname: Kambiz orcidid: 0000-0002-4194-9488 surname: Nael fullname: Nael, Kambiz – sequence: 6 givenname: Maxime surname: Tassy fullname: Tassy, Maxime – sequence: 7 givenname: Sarah surname: Quenet fullname: Quenet, Sarah – sequence: 8 givenname: Sylvain surname: Fogola fullname: Fogola, Sylvain – sequence: 9 givenname: Peter surname: Shabe fullname: Shabe, Peter – sequence: 10 givenname: David orcidid: 0009-0003-0833-9148 surname: Fussell fullname: Fussell, David – sequence: 11 givenname: Christophe surname: Avare fullname: Avare, Christophe – sequence: 12 givenname: Yasmina orcidid: 0000-0002-9734-172X surname: Chaibi fullname: Chaibi, Yasmina |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39255988$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNptkEtOwzAQhi1URB-w4QAoS4SU4kce9jKUApUqUdEisYuceNymSpxipwt23IEbchJSWlggViPNfDOj_-ujjqkNIHRO8JCROLiWa2OHCQ8EOUI9Iljki1C8dFAPExH6EcG8i_rOrTHGoYjpCeoyQcNQcN5D-S3AxpuCtKYwy8_3jxvpQHnJfDYeLeZeUi5rWzSryhublTQ5OO8JpALrzcDq2la7nieNattquxtPTAN2Y6GRTVEbb1FUcIqOtSwdnB3qAD3fjRejB3_6eD8ZJVM_pzxu_CiWWUyiSIcZo7mOVEByrpjWBAKqaKYo4UGgW4RFguA2udA6EDhQwEPJKBugy_3dja1ft-CatCpcDmUpDdRblzKC20echqRFLw7oNqtApRtbVNK-pT9iWuBqD-S2ds6C_kUITnfW05319Nt6C-M_cF7s8zdWFuV_K1-ODYWd |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics14232689 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1161/01.STR.0000196957.55928.ab 10.1111/jon.12693 10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 10.1007/s00234-018-2066-5 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105748 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.37708 10.1007/s00234-018-2098-x 10.3174/ajnr.A5742 10.1016/j.nic.2011.01.007 10.1007/978-1-4612-0795-5 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00252-0 10.1001/jama.2016.13647 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2023.107528 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104978 10.1080/03610919508813243 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02237-6 10.3174/ajnr.A2942 10.1177/23969873221140649 10.1177/1747493016681020 10.26044/ecr2023/C-19206. 10.3389/fneur.2023.1221255 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.04.002 10.1186/s41016-021-00257-x 10.1155/2018/3238165 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015473 10.1177/1591019920953055 10.1167/iovs.61.11.29 10.1055/s-0040-1709152 10.1117/12.2549075 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016368 10.1177/1747493016632244 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105791 10.3390/biomedicines9101486 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.040073 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105829 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017714 10.3174/ajnr.A7956 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002860 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 10.1007/s00330-019-06252-2 10.1007/s00234-020-02439-3 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012781 10.1177/001316446002000104 10.1159/000479707 10.1177/15910199211011861 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2025 by American Journal of Neuroradiology. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2025 by American Journal of Neuroradiology. |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.3174/ajnr.A8491 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine |
| EISSN | 1936-959X |
| EndPage | 551 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 39255988 10_3174_ajnr_A8491 |
| Genre | Multicenter Study Journal Article |
| GroupedDBID | --- .55 .GJ 23M 2WC 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 6J9 AAEJM AAYXX ACGFO ACIWK ACPRK ADBBV AENEX AFFNX AFHIN AFRAH AJJEV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BAWUL BTFSW C1A CITATION CS3 E3Z EBS EJD EMOBN F5P F9R GX1 H13 INIJC KQ8 MV1 N9A OK1 P2P P6G R0Z RHI RPM TNE TR2 UDS W8F WOQ WOW X7M ZCG ZGI ZXP CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-67ab7166f5b32cf6d41c8d3ff1e42d2bd21844f716369101749ff4904de85a323 |
| ISSN | 0195-6108 1936-959X |
| IngestDate | Sun Sep 28 02:14:23 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 10 06:23:39 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:52:34 EDT 2025 Wed Oct 01 06:28:12 EDT 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 3 |
| Language | English |
| License | 2025 by American Journal of Neuroradiology. |
| LinkModel | OpenURL |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c287t-67ab7166f5b32cf6d41c8d3ff1e42d2bd21844f716369101749ff4904de85a323 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| ORCID | 0009-0003-0833-9148 0000-0002-9734-172X 0000-0001-7645-7865 0000-0002-4351-6782 0000-0002-2359-7394 0000-0002-4194-9488 |
| PMID | 39255988 |
| PQID | 3102878251 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| PageCount | 8 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_3102878251 pubmed_primary_39255988 crossref_primary_10_3174_ajnr_A8491 crossref_citationtrail_10_3174_ajnr_A8491 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2025-Mar-04 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2025-03-04 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2025 text: 2025-Mar-04 day: 04 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
| PublicationTitle | American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | AJNR Am J Neuroradiol |
| PublicationYear | 2025 |
| References | Hassan (2025050715550595000_46.3.544.24) 2022; 2 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.9 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.8 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.7 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.6 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.46 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.5 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.23 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.45 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.4 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.26 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.48 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.3 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.25 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.47 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.2 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.28 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.1 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.27 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.29 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.31 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.30 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.11 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.33 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.10 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.32 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.13 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.35 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.12 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.34 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.15 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.37 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.14 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.36 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.17 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.39 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.16 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.38 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.19 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.18 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.40 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.20 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.42 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.41 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.22 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.44 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.21 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.43 |
| References_xml | – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.47 doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000196957.55928.ab – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.8 doi: 10.1111/jon.12693 – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.38 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.29 doi: 10.1007/s00234-018-2066-5 – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.9 doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105748 – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.36 doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.37708 – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.26 doi: 10.1007/s00234-018-2098-x – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.37 doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5742 – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.12 doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2011.01.007 – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.43 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-0795-5 – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.2 doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00252-0 – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.48 doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.13647 – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.35 doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2023.107528 – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.20 doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104978 – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.42 doi: 10.1080/03610919508813243 – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.7 doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02237-6 – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.13 doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2942 – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.34 doi: 10.1177/23969873221140649 – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.19 doi: 10.1177/1747493016681020 – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.39 doi: 10.26044/ecr2023/C-19206. – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.32 doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1221255 – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.46 doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.04.002 – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.14 doi: 10.1186/s41016-021-00257-x – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.1 doi: 10.1155/2018/3238165 – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.16 doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015473 – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.23 doi: 10.1177/1591019920953055 – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.41 doi: 10.1167/iovs.61.11.29 – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.6 doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709152 – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.44 doi: 10.1117/12.2549075 – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.17 – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.10 doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016368 – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.18 doi: 10.1177/1747493016632244 – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.21 doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105791 – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.4 doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9101486 – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.5 doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.040073 – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.31 doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105829 – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.25 doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017714 – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.33 doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7956 – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.15 doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002860 – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.45 doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.27 doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06252-2 – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.28 doi: 10.1007/s00234-020-02439-3 – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.3 doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012781 – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.22 – volume: 2 start-page: e000224 year: 2022 ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.24 article-title: Artificial Intelligence–Parallel Stroke Workflow Tool Improves Reperfusion Rates and Door‐In to Puncture Interval publication-title: Stroke Vasc Interv Neurol – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.40 doi: 10.1177/001316446002000104 – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.11 doi: 10.1159/000479707 – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.30 doi: 10.1177/15910199211011861 |
| SSID | ssj0005972 |
| Score | 2.4814153 |
| Snippet | ASPECTS is a long-standing and well-documented selection criterion for acute ischemic stroke treatment; however, the interpretation of ASPECTS is a challenging... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
| StartPage | 544 |
| SubjectTerms | Algorithms Computed Tomography Angiography Deep Learning Humans Ischemic Stroke - diagnostic imaging Observer Variation Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods Reproducibility of Results Retrospective Studies |
| Title | Deep Learning–Based ASPECTS Algorithm Enhances Reader Performance and Reduces Interpretation Time |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39255988 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3102878251 |
| Volume | 46 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAFT databaseName: Open Access Digital Library customDbUrl: eissn: 1936-959X dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0005972 issn: 0195-6108 databaseCode: KQ8 dateStart: 19800101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://grweb.coalliance.org/oadl/oadl.html providerName: Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFLbKkBAviDvlJiMQEqqyNY5zewyl0zRGuSyV-hbZsd0OdWnpugcQP57jS9NkKtLgJapSN6l8Ph2fY3_nOwi9AQjEZRyFHudgBqoS5SVl2PekID7zWcwZN2yLUXQ0pseTcNLp_G5Wl6z5fvlrZ13J_1gV7oFddZXsP1i2fijcgM9gX7iCheF6LRt_kHK5UUideu9hQRK97PTLcJCf9rL5dAGJ_-y8N6xm2rQXhjAvV5r03qoV-KbVW-HrK_xDXRzSDF3rs52G2IRRw1wx4ZSczC7j8ag-PMp-LviZpU1O5bxeAGplg0yw8wa_wLodwxjeEpEHM3v6ZGvh3U6t26YgoeFp0YZnTYPIS0PTNxcWnh33nDt2O5JnzWzd-NbQCkVe9fkQAFG9oH2vVvtZQm3vr7aw9uhzcTg-OSny4SR_u_zh6Z5j-mzeNWC5gW4SWBN044-PX7da85BqEctJsH_Sitvq1x1sX9YOZ_6So5hYJb-L7rgkA2cWMfdQR1b30a1PjkbxADENHNwGDnbAwTVw8AY42AIHN4CDATjYAQe3gYM1cB6i8eEwHxx5rteGV0LOvPaimHFInSMV8oCUKhLULxMRKOVLSgThQm8FUAVDgijVbpymStG0T4VMQhaQ4BHaqxaVfIIw16KLhImEQ-gYEpWKPmE8CmOfESVF3EXvNlNWlE6IXvdDmReQkOrpLfT0FmZ6u-h1PXZp5Vd2jnq1mfkCvKM-8mKVXFxewECIn2Ndnt1Fj61J6udAZqC7EyRPr_HrZ-j2FtTP0d56dSlfQDS65i8NaP4A2pONTQ |
| linkProvider | Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Deep+Learning-Based+ASPECTS+Algorithm+Enhances+Reader+Performance+and+Reduces+Interpretation+Time&rft.jtitle=American+journal+of+neuroradiology+%3A+AJNR&rft.au=Ayobi%2C+Angela&rft.au=Davis%2C+Adam&rft.au=Chang%2C+Peter+D&rft.au=Chow%2C+Daniel+S&rft.date=2025-03-04&rft.issn=1936-959X&rft.eissn=1936-959X&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=544&rft_id=info:doi/10.3174%2Fajnr.A8491&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0195-6108&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0195-6108&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0195-6108&client=summon |