Deep Learning–Based ASPECTS Algorithm Enhances Reader Performance and Reduces Interpretation Time

ASPECTS is a long-standing and well-documented selection criterion for acute ischemic stroke treatment; however, the interpretation of ASPECTS is a challenging and time-consuming task for physicians with notable interobserver variabilities. We conducted a multireader, multicase study in which reader...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of neuroradiology : AJNR Vol. 46; no. 3; pp. 544 - 551
Main Authors Ayobi, Angela, Davis, Adam, Chang, Peter D., Chow, Daniel S., Nael, Kambiz, Tassy, Maxime, Quenet, Sarah, Fogola, Sylvain, Shabe, Peter, Fussell, David, Avare, Christophe, Chaibi, Yasmina
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 04.03.2025
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0195-6108
1936-959X
1936-959X
DOI10.3174/ajnr.A8491

Cover

Abstract ASPECTS is a long-standing and well-documented selection criterion for acute ischemic stroke treatment; however, the interpretation of ASPECTS is a challenging and time-consuming task for physicians with notable interobserver variabilities. We conducted a multireader, multicase study in which readers assessed ASPECTS without and with the support of a deep learning (DL)-based algorithm to analyze the impact of the software on clinicians' performance and interpretation time. A total of 200 NCCT scans from 5 clinical sites (27 scanner models, 4 different vendors) were retrospectively collected. The reference standard was established through the consensus of 3 expert neuroradiologists who had access to baseline CTA and CTP data. Subsequently, 8 additional clinicians (4 typical ASPECTS readers and 4 senior neuroradiologists) analyzed the NCCT scans without and with the assistance of CINA-ASPECTS (Avicenna.AI), a DL-based, FDA-cleared, and CE-marked algorithm designed to compute ASPECTS automatically. Differences were evaluated in both performance and interpretation time between the assisted and unassisted assessments. With software aid, readers demonstrated increased region-based accuracy from 72.4% to 76.5% ( < .05) and increased receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC AUC) from 0.749 to 0.788 ( < .05). Notably, all readers exhibited an improved ROC AUC when utilizing the software. Moreover, the use of the algorithm improved the score-based interobserver reliability and correlation coefficient of ASPECTS evaluation by 0.222 and 0.087 ( < .0001), respectively. Additionally, the readers' mean time spent analyzing a case was significantly reduced by 6% ( < .05) when aided by the algorithm. With the assistance of the algorithm, readers' analyses were not only more accurate but also faster. Additionally, the overall ASPECTS evaluation exhibited greater consistency, fewer variabilities, and higher precision compared with the reference standard. This novel tool has the potential to enhance patient selection for appropriate treatment by enabling physicians to deliver accurate and timely diagnoses of acute ischemic stroke.
AbstractList ASPECTS is a long-standing and well-documented selection criterion for acute ischemic stroke treatment; however, the interpretation of ASPECTS is a challenging and time-consuming task for physicians with notable interobserver variabilities. We conducted a multireader, multicase study in which readers assessed ASPECTS without and with the support of a deep learning (DL)-based algorithm to analyze the impact of the software on clinicians' performance and interpretation time.BACKGROUND AND PURPOSEASPECTS is a long-standing and well-documented selection criterion for acute ischemic stroke treatment; however, the interpretation of ASPECTS is a challenging and time-consuming task for physicians with notable interobserver variabilities. We conducted a multireader, multicase study in which readers assessed ASPECTS without and with the support of a deep learning (DL)-based algorithm to analyze the impact of the software on clinicians' performance and interpretation time.A total of 200 NCCT scans from 5 clinical sites (27 scanner models, 4 different vendors) were retrospectively collected. The reference standard was established through the consensus of 3 expert neuroradiologists who had access to baseline CTA and CTP data. Subsequently, 8 additional clinicians (4 typical ASPECTS readers and 4 senior neuroradiologists) analyzed the NCCT scans without and with the assistance of CINA-ASPECTS (Avicenna.AI), a DL-based, FDA-cleared, and CE-marked algorithm designed to compute ASPECTS automatically. Differences were evaluated in both performance and interpretation time between the assisted and unassisted assessments.MATERIALS AND METHODSA total of 200 NCCT scans from 5 clinical sites (27 scanner models, 4 different vendors) were retrospectively collected. The reference standard was established through the consensus of 3 expert neuroradiologists who had access to baseline CTA and CTP data. Subsequently, 8 additional clinicians (4 typical ASPECTS readers and 4 senior neuroradiologists) analyzed the NCCT scans without and with the assistance of CINA-ASPECTS (Avicenna.AI), a DL-based, FDA-cleared, and CE-marked algorithm designed to compute ASPECTS automatically. Differences were evaluated in both performance and interpretation time between the assisted and unassisted assessments.With software aid, readers demonstrated increased region-based accuracy from 72.4% to 76.5% (P < .05) and increased receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC AUC) from 0.749 to 0.788 (P < .05). Notably, all readers exhibited an improved ROC AUC when utilizing the software. Moreover, the use of the algorithm improved the score-based interobserver reliability and correlation coefficient of ASPECTS evaluation by 0.222 and 0.087 (P < .0001), respectively. Additionally, the readers' mean time spent analyzing a case was significantly reduced by 6% (P < .05) when aided by the algorithm.RESULTSWith software aid, readers demonstrated increased region-based accuracy from 72.4% to 76.5% (P < .05) and increased receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC AUC) from 0.749 to 0.788 (P < .05). Notably, all readers exhibited an improved ROC AUC when utilizing the software. Moreover, the use of the algorithm improved the score-based interobserver reliability and correlation coefficient of ASPECTS evaluation by 0.222 and 0.087 (P < .0001), respectively. Additionally, the readers' mean time spent analyzing a case was significantly reduced by 6% (P < .05) when aided by the algorithm.With the assistance of the algorithm, readers' analyses were not only more accurate but also faster. Additionally, the overall ASPECTS evaluation exhibited greater consistency, fewer variabilities, and higher precision compared with the reference standard. This novel tool has the potential to enhance patient selection for appropriate treatment by enabling physicians to deliver accurate and timely diagnoses of acute ischemic stroke.CONCLUSIONSWith the assistance of the algorithm, readers' analyses were not only more accurate but also faster. Additionally, the overall ASPECTS evaluation exhibited greater consistency, fewer variabilities, and higher precision compared with the reference standard. This novel tool has the potential to enhance patient selection for appropriate treatment by enabling physicians to deliver accurate and timely diagnoses of acute ischemic stroke.
ASPECTS is a long-standing and well-documented selection criterion for acute ischemic stroke treatment; however, the interpretation of ASPECTS is a challenging and time-consuming task for physicians with notable interobserver variabilities. We conducted a multireader, multicase study in which readers assessed ASPECTS without and with the support of a deep learning (DL)-based algorithm to analyze the impact of the software on clinicians' performance and interpretation time. A total of 200 NCCT scans from 5 clinical sites (27 scanner models, 4 different vendors) were retrospectively collected. The reference standard was established through the consensus of 3 expert neuroradiologists who had access to baseline CTA and CTP data. Subsequently, 8 additional clinicians (4 typical ASPECTS readers and 4 senior neuroradiologists) analyzed the NCCT scans without and with the assistance of CINA-ASPECTS (Avicenna.AI), a DL-based, FDA-cleared, and CE-marked algorithm designed to compute ASPECTS automatically. Differences were evaluated in both performance and interpretation time between the assisted and unassisted assessments. With software aid, readers demonstrated increased region-based accuracy from 72.4% to 76.5% ( < .05) and increased receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC AUC) from 0.749 to 0.788 ( < .05). Notably, all readers exhibited an improved ROC AUC when utilizing the software. Moreover, the use of the algorithm improved the score-based interobserver reliability and correlation coefficient of ASPECTS evaluation by 0.222 and 0.087 ( < .0001), respectively. Additionally, the readers' mean time spent analyzing a case was significantly reduced by 6% ( < .05) when aided by the algorithm. With the assistance of the algorithm, readers' analyses were not only more accurate but also faster. Additionally, the overall ASPECTS evaluation exhibited greater consistency, fewer variabilities, and higher precision compared with the reference standard. This novel tool has the potential to enhance patient selection for appropriate treatment by enabling physicians to deliver accurate and timely diagnoses of acute ischemic stroke.
Author Tassy, Maxime
Fogola, Sylvain
Chaibi, Yasmina
Quenet, Sarah
Ayobi, Angela
Chow, Daniel S.
Davis, Adam
Nael, Kambiz
Shabe, Peter
Fussell, David
Chang, Peter D.
Avare, Christophe
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Angela
  orcidid: 0000-0002-4351-6782
  surname: Ayobi
  fullname: Ayobi, Angela
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Adam
  surname: Davis
  fullname: Davis, Adam
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Peter D.
  orcidid: 0000-0001-7645-7865
  surname: Chang
  fullname: Chang, Peter D.
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Daniel S.
  orcidid: 0000-0002-2359-7394
  surname: Chow
  fullname: Chow, Daniel S.
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Kambiz
  orcidid: 0000-0002-4194-9488
  surname: Nael
  fullname: Nael, Kambiz
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Maxime
  surname: Tassy
  fullname: Tassy, Maxime
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Sarah
  surname: Quenet
  fullname: Quenet, Sarah
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Sylvain
  surname: Fogola
  fullname: Fogola, Sylvain
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Peter
  surname: Shabe
  fullname: Shabe, Peter
– sequence: 10
  givenname: David
  orcidid: 0009-0003-0833-9148
  surname: Fussell
  fullname: Fussell, David
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Christophe
  surname: Avare
  fullname: Avare, Christophe
– sequence: 12
  givenname: Yasmina
  orcidid: 0000-0002-9734-172X
  surname: Chaibi
  fullname: Chaibi, Yasmina
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39255988$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNptkEtOwzAQhi1URB-w4QAoS4SU4kce9jKUApUqUdEisYuceNymSpxipwt23IEbchJSWlggViPNfDOj_-ujjqkNIHRO8JCROLiWa2OHCQ8EOUI9Iljki1C8dFAPExH6EcG8i_rOrTHGoYjpCeoyQcNQcN5D-S3AxpuCtKYwy8_3jxvpQHnJfDYeLeZeUi5rWzSryhublTQ5OO8JpALrzcDq2la7nieNattquxtPTAN2Y6GRTVEbb1FUcIqOtSwdnB3qAD3fjRejB3_6eD8ZJVM_pzxu_CiWWUyiSIcZo7mOVEByrpjWBAKqaKYo4UGgW4RFguA2udA6EDhQwEPJKBugy_3dja1ft-CatCpcDmUpDdRblzKC20echqRFLw7oNqtApRtbVNK-pT9iWuBqD-S2ds6C_kUITnfW05319Nt6C-M_cF7s8zdWFuV_K1-ODYWd
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics14232689
Cites_doi 10.1161/01.STR.0000196957.55928.ab
10.1111/jon.12693
10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28
10.1007/s00234-018-2066-5
10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105748
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.37708
10.1007/s00234-018-2098-x
10.3174/ajnr.A5742
10.1016/j.nic.2011.01.007
10.1007/978-1-4612-0795-5
10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00252-0
10.1001/jama.2016.13647
10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2023.107528
10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104978
10.1080/03610919508813243
10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02237-6
10.3174/ajnr.A2942
10.1177/23969873221140649
10.1177/1747493016681020
10.26044/ecr2023/C-19206.
10.3389/fneur.2023.1221255
10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.04.002
10.1186/s41016-021-00257-x
10.1155/2018/3238165
10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015473
10.1177/1591019920953055
10.1167/iovs.61.11.29
10.1055/s-0040-1709152
10.1117/12.2549075
10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016368
10.1177/1747493016632244
10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105791
10.3390/biomedicines9101486
10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.040073
10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105829
10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017714
10.3174/ajnr.A7956
10.1212/WNL.0000000000002860
10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
10.1007/s00330-019-06252-2
10.1007/s00234-020-02439-3
10.1212/WNL.0000000000012781
10.1177/001316446002000104
10.1159/000479707
10.1177/15910199211011861
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2025 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2025 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.3174/ajnr.A8491
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1936-959X
EndPage 551
ExternalDocumentID 39255988
10_3174_ajnr_A8491
Genre Multicenter Study
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
.55
.GJ
23M
2WC
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
6J9
AAEJM
AAYXX
ACGFO
ACIWK
ACPRK
ADBBV
AENEX
AFFNX
AFHIN
AFRAH
AJJEV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BAWUL
BTFSW
C1A
CITATION
CS3
E3Z
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
F5P
F9R
GX1
H13
INIJC
KQ8
MV1
N9A
OK1
P2P
P6G
R0Z
RHI
RPM
TNE
TR2
UDS
W8F
WOQ
WOW
X7M
ZCG
ZGI
ZXP
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-67ab7166f5b32cf6d41c8d3ff1e42d2bd21844f716369101749ff4904de85a323
ISSN 0195-6108
1936-959X
IngestDate Sun Sep 28 02:14:23 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 06:23:39 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:52:34 EDT 2025
Wed Oct 01 06:28:12 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Language English
License 2025 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c287t-67ab7166f5b32cf6d41c8d3ff1e42d2bd21844f716369101749ff4904de85a323
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0009-0003-0833-9148
0000-0002-9734-172X
0000-0001-7645-7865
0000-0002-4351-6782
0000-0002-2359-7394
0000-0002-4194-9488
PMID 39255988
PQID 3102878251
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_3102878251
pubmed_primary_39255988
crossref_primary_10_3174_ajnr_A8491
crossref_citationtrail_10_3174_ajnr_A8491
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2025-Mar-04
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-03-04
PublicationDate_xml – month: 03
  year: 2025
  text: 2025-Mar-04
  day: 04
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR
PublicationTitleAlternate AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
PublicationYear 2025
References Hassan (2025050715550595000_46.3.544.24) 2022; 2
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.9
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.8
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.7
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.6
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.46
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.5
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.23
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.45
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.4
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.26
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.48
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.3
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.25
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.47
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.2
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.28
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.1
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.27
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.29
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.31
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.30
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.11
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.33
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.10
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.32
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.13
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.35
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.12
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.34
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.15
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.37
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.14
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.36
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.17
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.39
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.16
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.38
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.19
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.18
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.40
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.20
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.42
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.41
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.22
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.44
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.21
2025050715550595000_46.3.544.43
References_xml – ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.47
  doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000196957.55928.ab
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.8
  doi: 10.1111/jon.12693
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.38
  doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.29
  doi: 10.1007/s00234-018-2066-5
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.9
  doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105748
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.36
  doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.37708
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.26
  doi: 10.1007/s00234-018-2098-x
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.37
  doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5742
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.12
  doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2011.01.007
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.43
  doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-0795-5
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.2
  doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00252-0
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.48
  doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.13647
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.35
  doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2023.107528
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.20
  doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104978
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.42
  doi: 10.1080/03610919508813243
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.7
  doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02237-6
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.13
  doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2942
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.34
  doi: 10.1177/23969873221140649
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.19
  doi: 10.1177/1747493016681020
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.39
  doi: 10.26044/ecr2023/C-19206.
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.32
  doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1221255
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.46
  doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.04.002
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.14
  doi: 10.1186/s41016-021-00257-x
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.1
  doi: 10.1155/2018/3238165
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.16
  doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015473
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.23
  doi: 10.1177/1591019920953055
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.41
  doi: 10.1167/iovs.61.11.29
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.6
  doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709152
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.44
  doi: 10.1117/12.2549075
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.17
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.10
  doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016368
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.18
  doi: 10.1177/1747493016632244
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.21
  doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105791
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.4
  doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9101486
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.5
  doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.040073
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.31
  doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105829
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.25
  doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017714
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.33
  doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7956
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.15
  doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002860
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.45
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.27
  doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06252-2
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.28
  doi: 10.1007/s00234-020-02439-3
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.3
  doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012781
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.22
– volume: 2
  start-page: e000224
  year: 2022
  ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.24
  article-title: Artificial Intelligence–Parallel Stroke Workflow Tool Improves Reperfusion Rates and Door‐In to Puncture Interval
  publication-title: Stroke Vasc Interv Neurol
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.40
  doi: 10.1177/001316446002000104
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.11
  doi: 10.1159/000479707
– ident: 2025050715550595000_46.3.544.30
  doi: 10.1177/15910199211011861
SSID ssj0005972
Score 2.4814153
Snippet ASPECTS is a long-standing and well-documented selection criterion for acute ischemic stroke treatment; however, the interpretation of ASPECTS is a challenging...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 544
SubjectTerms Algorithms
Computed Tomography Angiography
Deep Learning
Humans
Ischemic Stroke - diagnostic imaging
Observer Variation
Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective Studies
Title Deep Learning–Based ASPECTS Algorithm Enhances Reader Performance and Reduces Interpretation Time
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39255988
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3102878251
Volume 46
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVAFT
  databaseName: Open Access Digital Library
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1936-959X
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0005972
  issn: 0195-6108
  databaseCode: KQ8
  dateStart: 19800101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://grweb.coalliance.org/oadl/oadl.html
  providerName: Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFLbKkBAviDvlJiMQEqqyNY5zewyl0zRGuSyV-hbZsd0OdWnpugcQP57jS9NkKtLgJapSN6l8Ph2fY3_nOwi9AQjEZRyFHudgBqoS5SVl2PekID7zWcwZN2yLUXQ0pseTcNLp_G5Wl6z5fvlrZ13J_1gV7oFddZXsP1i2fijcgM9gX7iCheF6LRt_kHK5UUideu9hQRK97PTLcJCf9rL5dAGJ_-y8N6xm2rQXhjAvV5r03qoV-KbVW-HrK_xDXRzSDF3rs52G2IRRw1wx4ZSczC7j8ag-PMp-LviZpU1O5bxeAGplg0yw8wa_wLodwxjeEpEHM3v6ZGvh3U6t26YgoeFp0YZnTYPIS0PTNxcWnh33nDt2O5JnzWzd-NbQCkVe9fkQAFG9oH2vVvtZQm3vr7aw9uhzcTg-OSny4SR_u_zh6Z5j-mzeNWC5gW4SWBN044-PX7da85BqEctJsH_Sitvq1x1sX9YOZ_6So5hYJb-L7rgkA2cWMfdQR1b30a1PjkbxADENHNwGDnbAwTVw8AY42AIHN4CDATjYAQe3gYM1cB6i8eEwHxx5rteGV0LOvPaimHFInSMV8oCUKhLULxMRKOVLSgThQm8FUAVDgijVbpymStG0T4VMQhaQ4BHaqxaVfIIw16KLhImEQ-gYEpWKPmE8CmOfESVF3EXvNlNWlE6IXvdDmReQkOrpLfT0FmZ6u-h1PXZp5Vd2jnq1mfkCvKM-8mKVXFxewECIn2Ndnt1Fj61J6udAZqC7EyRPr_HrZ-j2FtTP0d56dSlfQDS65i8NaP4A2pONTQ
linkProvider Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Deep+Learning-Based+ASPECTS+Algorithm+Enhances+Reader+Performance+and+Reduces+Interpretation+Time&rft.jtitle=American+journal+of+neuroradiology+%3A+AJNR&rft.au=Ayobi%2C+Angela&rft.au=Davis%2C+Adam&rft.au=Chang%2C+Peter+D&rft.au=Chow%2C+Daniel+S&rft.date=2025-03-04&rft.issn=1936-959X&rft.eissn=1936-959X&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=544&rft_id=info:doi/10.3174%2Fajnr.A8491&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0195-6108&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0195-6108&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0195-6108&client=summon