Two‐ Versus 8‐Zone Lung Ultrasound in Heart Failure: Analysis of a Large Data Set Using a Deep Learning Algorithm

Scanning protocols for lung ultrasound often include 8 or more lung zones, which may limit real-world clinical use. We sought to compare a 2-zone, anterior-superior thoracic ultrasound protocol for B-line artifact detection with an 8-zone approach in patients with known or suspected heart failure us...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of ultrasound in medicine Vol. 42; no. 10; pp. 2349 - 2356
Main Authors Baloescu, Cristiana, Chen, Alvin, Varasteh, Alexander, Toporek, Grzegorz, McNamara, Robert L., Raju, Balasundar, Moore, Chris
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England 01.10.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0278-4297
1550-9613
1550-9613
DOI10.1002/jum.16262

Cover

More Information
Summary:Scanning protocols for lung ultrasound often include 8 or more lung zones, which may limit real-world clinical use. We sought to compare a 2-zone, anterior-superior thoracic ultrasound protocol for B-line artifact detection with an 8-zone approach in patients with known or suspected heart failure using a deep learning (DL) algorithm. Adult patients with suspected heart failure and B-lines on initial lung ultrasound were enrolled in a prospective observational study. Subjects received daily ultrasounds with a hand-held ultrasound system using an 8-zone protocol (right and left anterior/lateral and superior/inferior). A previously published deep learning algorithm that rates severity of B-lines on a 0-4 scale was adapted for use on hand-held ultrasound full video loops. Average severities for 8 and 2 zones were calculated utilizing DL ratings. Bland-Altman plot analyses were used to assess agreement and identify bias between 2- and 8-zone scores for both primary (all patients, 5728 videos, 205 subjects) and subgroup (confirmed diagnosis of heart failure or pulmonary edema, 4464 videos, 147 subjects) analyses. Bland-Altman plot analyses revealed excellent agreement for both primary and subgroup analyses. The absolute difference on the 4-point scale between 8- and 2-zone average scores was not significant for the primary dataset (0.03; 95% CI -0.01 to 0.07) or the subgroup (0.01; 95% CI -0.04 to 0.06). Utilization of a 2-zone, anterior-superior thoracic ultrasound protocol provided similar severity information to an 8-zone approach for a dataset of subjects with known or suspected heart failure.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0278-4297
1550-9613
1550-9613
DOI:10.1002/jum.16262