Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment: a Review of Risk Factor-based Algorithms and Assessments of Vascular Health

Risk factors related to the development of subclinical atherosclerosis and subsequent cardiovascular disease (CVD) events are well established. Starting with the Framingham Risk Score (FRS), several algorithms have been developed using these risk factors to predict the development of CVD, and the re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCurrent cardiovascular risk reports Vol. 8; no. 12; p. 419
Main Authors Carrubba, Christopher Joseph, Blaha, Michael J., Nasir, Khurram, DeFilippis, Andrew Paul
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Boston Springer US 01.12.2014
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1932-9520
1932-9563
DOI10.1007/s12170-014-0419-0

Cover

More Information
Summary:Risk factors related to the development of subclinical atherosclerosis and subsequent cardiovascular disease (CVD) events are well established. Starting with the Framingham Risk Score (FRS), several algorithms have been developed using these risk factors to predict the development of CVD, and the recent ACC/AHA guidelines recommend the use of new pooled cohort equations to predict 10-year risk for a first hard atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) event in subjects 40–79 years of age. However, the limitations of these risk factor-based algorithms have been well documented and include decreased calibration when applied to populations outside of the initial cohort, inability to account for lifetime risk in younger populations, and the heterogeneity that exists between the presence of risk factors and actual atherosclerotic disease burden. As such, recent strategies have attempted to incorporate measurements of both vascular health, including carotid interna media thickness (CIMT), microalbuminuria, flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and aortic stiffness, and subclinical atherosclerosis through coronary artery calcium (CAC) screening into traditional risk assessment. Here, we review these different strategies for risk assessment and examine how these strategies can be combined to improve discrimination and reliability.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1932-9520
1932-9563
DOI:10.1007/s12170-014-0419-0