Intercomparison of five nets used for mesozooplankton sampling
Intercomparison of nets commonly used for mesozooplankton sampling in the Black and Mediterranean seas was attempted within SESAME (Southern European Seas: Assessing and Modelling Ecosystem Changes) project. Five nets were compared: three Juday nets equipped with 150 μm, 180 μm and 200 μm mesh size,...
Saved in:
Published in | Mediterranean marine science Vol. 16; no. 3; p. 550 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
01.01.2015
|
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1108-393X 1791-6763 |
DOI | 10.12681/mms.1100 |
Cover
Abstract | Intercomparison of nets commonly used for mesozooplankton sampling in the Black and Mediterranean seas was attempted within SESAME (Southern European Seas: Assessing and Modelling Ecosystem Changes) project. Five nets were compared: three Juday nets equipped with 150 μm, 180 μm and 200 μm mesh size, Nansen net (100 μm mesh size) and WP2 (200 μm mesh size). Replicated samples were collected at one station in the western Black Sea offshore waters in April 2009. Collected samples were analyzed at species level (except for meroplankton), stages (for copepods) and size length. A decrease of total abundance values was observed with increasing mesh size, due to the significantly higher numbers of animals smaller than 1 mm in the samples obtained by fine mesh size than with coarser nets. Few comparisons were revealed significant for the abundance of animals with 1-2 mm length, while no significance was detected for specimens larger than 2 mm. The above differences resulted in discripancies between nets regarding species and stages composition. Biomass values did not differ significantly between nets, due to the strong contribution to total biomass of the large animals fraction (Calanus euxinus). The smallest and the largest animals revealed high variability between replicates collected by Nansen, Juday- 200 μm and WP2 nets. Correction factors were calculated for the conversion of abundance values between each couple of nets. The detected differences between nets regarding the abundance and biomass, the community taxonomic composition and size structure, as well as the estimated correction factors, provide useful information for the harmonization of data obtained by the above nets in the Black Sea. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Intercomparison of nets commonly used for mesozooplankton sampling in the Black and Mediterranean seas was attempted within SESAME (Southern European Seas: Assessing and Modelling Ecosystem Changes) project. Five nets were compared: three Juday nets equipped with 150 μm, 180 μm and 200 μm mesh size, Nansen net (100 μm mesh size) and WP2 (200 μm mesh size). Replicated samples were collected at one station in the western Black Sea offshore waters in April 2009. Collected samples were analyzed at species level (except for meroplankton), stages (for copepods) and size length. A decrease of total abundance values was observed with increasing mesh size, due to the significantly higher numbers of animals smaller than 1 mm in the samples obtained by fine mesh size than with coarser nets. Few comparisons were revealed significant for the abundance of animals with 1-2 mm length, while no significance was detected for specimens larger than 2 mm. The above differences resulted in discripancies between nets regarding species and stages composition. Biomass values did not differ significantly between nets, due to the strong contribution to total biomass of the large animals fraction (Calanus euxinus). The smallest and the largest animals revealed high variability between replicates collected by Nansen, Juday- 200 μm and WP2 nets. Correction factors were calculated for the conversion of abundance values between each couple of nets. The detected differences between nets regarding the abundance and biomass, the community taxonomic composition and size structure, as well as the estimated correction factors, provide useful information for the harmonization of data obtained by the above nets in the Black Sea. |
Author | PANTAZI, M. ALTUKHOV, D. SIOKOU, I. ARASHKEVICH, E. TIMOFTE, F. NIKISHINA, A. STEFANOVA, K. GUBANOVA, A. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: D. surname: ALTUKHOV fullname: ALTUKHOV, D. – sequence: 2 givenname: I. surname: SIOKOU fullname: SIOKOU, I. – sequence: 3 givenname: M. surname: PANTAZI fullname: PANTAZI, M. – sequence: 4 givenname: K. surname: STEFANOVA fullname: STEFANOVA, K. – sequence: 5 givenname: F. surname: TIMOFTE fullname: TIMOFTE, F. – sequence: 6 givenname: A. surname: GUBANOVA fullname: GUBANOVA, A. – sequence: 7 givenname: A. surname: NIKISHINA fullname: NIKISHINA, A. – sequence: 8 givenname: E. surname: ARASHKEVICH fullname: ARASHKEVICH, E. |
BookMark | eNptj01LxDAURYOM4Mzown_QrYvOvDRtkm4EGXQcGHCj4K6kmReJNklJoqC_3vqxElf3Lu65cBZk5oNHQs4prGjFJV07l1aUAhyRORUtLbngbDZ1CrJkLXs8IYuUngE4k1DNyeXOZ4w6uFFFm4IvgimMfcPCY07Fa8JDYUIsHKbwEcI4KP-Sp1VSbhysfzolx0YNCc9-c0kebq7vN7fl_m6721ztS13xOpctMJS9ZMYgp1IdGFQoqkbyRmmpuUFqhJi6QGhRmgahYiD7A9d1X7esYUuy_vnVMaQU0XTaZpVt8DkqO3QUum_9btLvvvQn4uIPMUbrVHz_Z_sJn15efQ |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_marpolbul_2019_110705 crossref_primary_10_5194_bg_17_5417_2020 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmars_2021_705042 crossref_primary_10_1002_edn3_70037 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION |
DOI | 10.12681/mms.1100 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Oceanography |
EISSN | 1791-6763 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_12681_mms_1100 |
GroupedDBID | 123 29M 2WC 5VS AAYXX AENEX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS CITATION E3Z IPNFZ KQ8 OK1 OVT RIG RNS ~02 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-903e8b83ffe618ad302e725865ac8c6fe1f775ac7e09e8f5e02308bd6c4b49353 |
ISSN | 1108-393X |
IngestDate | Thu Apr 24 22:57:10 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:18:28 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | false |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c264t-903e8b83ffe618ad302e725865ac8c6fe1f775ac7e09e8f5e02308bd6c4b49353 |
OpenAccessLink | https://ejournals.epublishing.ekt.gr/index.php/hcmr-med-mar-sc/article/download/12931/12486 |
ParticipantIDs | crossref_citationtrail_10_12681_mms_1100 crossref_primary_10_12681_mms_1100 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2015-01-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2015-01-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2015 text: 2015-01-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationTitle | Mediterranean marine science |
PublicationYear | 2015 |
SSID | ssj0063802 |
Score | 2.0055468 |
Snippet | Intercomparison of nets commonly used for mesozooplankton sampling in the Black and Mediterranean seas was attempted within SESAME (Southern European Seas:... |
SourceID | crossref |
SourceType | Enrichment Source Index Database |
StartPage | 550 |
Title | Intercomparison of five nets used for mesozooplankton sampling |
Volume | 16 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3NT9swFLdGd5mQJjaGYMAUTTsgVSlJ82HnghQhUBlTs0kpQlwq27Ev0ASRcOlfz3vOR6OWA-wSWZadKPk5v_f8_D4I-aVgl6xBzNmUO77tM-3YLBORDf8WZZxnkkrjbTENJzP_921wuypvZaJLKjGSy1fjSv4HVegDXDFK9h3IdjeFDmgDvnAFhOH6JoyNOU_2KwkONXoC5aoqh88l6JLoRLhQZbEsiscHnt9jEo2Soxd5I7HaYk4gw-BeILjQMr_gGBM4bKRjtyb-pLPrSXJjaGrUmWaukutkZqim6_sbT9P47soYW1cD04vLeJrcxIZbRn1zgxv0zA01Q7poUI1MEV8QIHUfjVw7bJmqpdWwt3y8HkcGdabZDe4ehwzJe7EoMTbBWQmo9lB-TW513oS4j8HJc5g6x6lb5OOYgiqFZ_T_ukMlYJraBbV9gybRFE49bZ_aU096eka6Qz43GwQrrtH-Qj6o_CvZTiTg0mQX3yVna8BbhbYQeAuBtxB4C4C31oC3WuC_kdnlRXo-sZtCGLYEfbWyI8dTTDBPaxW6jGeeM1Z0HLAw4JLJUCtXUwptCn-eYjpQuLFkIgulL_zIC7w9MsiLXO1jiH7gcOErxf3MF5iVWAoPlGRoKVdk-oCctO8_l02WeCxW8jDf-MoH5Gc39LFOjbI56PtbBh2ST6uldkQG1dOzOgZdrxI_DIIvjPVUgw |
linkProvider | Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intercomparison+of+five+nets+used+for+mesozooplankton+sampling&rft.jtitle=Mediterranean+marine+science&rft.au=ALTUKHOV%2C+D.&rft.au=SIOKOU%2C+I.&rft.au=PANTAZI%2C+M.&rft.au=STEFANOVA%2C+K.&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.issn=1108-393X&rft.eissn=1791-6763&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=550&rft_id=info:doi/10.12681%2Fmms.1100&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_12681_mms_1100 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1108-393X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1108-393X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1108-393X&client=summon |