Keratometry repeatability in healthy and post-refractive surgery eyes: a comparison of two swept-source devices

To analyze the keratometry repeatability obtained with two swept-source devices in healthy and post-refractive surgery eyes. One hundred volunteers aged between 20 and 55 years were recruited for this study including both healthy and post-refractive surgery eyes. Patients included in the post-refrac...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology
Main Authors Martínez-Albert, Noelia, Nieto-Fernández, Juan Carlos, García-Marqués, José Vicente
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Germany 16.08.2025
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0721-832X
1435-702X
1435-702X
DOI10.1007/s00417-025-06893-8

Cover

Abstract To analyze the keratometry repeatability obtained with two swept-source devices in healthy and post-refractive surgery eyes. One hundred volunteers aged between 20 and 55 years were recruited for this study including both healthy and post-refractive surgery eyes. Patients included in the post-refractive surgery group underwent Laser-Assisted in Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) or Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK). Three consecutive measurements were taken with the IOLMaster 700 and Anterion and the evaluated measurements were simulated keratometry (Sim K), posterior keratometry (PK), and total keratometry (TK). Repeatability was assessed through the intra-subject standard deviation (S ), repeatability limit (R), and variability coefficient (CoV). Fifty patients were included in the control and post-refractive surgery groups, respectively. Similar repeatability was obtained for healthy and post-refractive surgery eyes using both devices. For IOLMaster 700, R ranged between 0.16 and 0.22 D for Sim K, 0.09-0.11 D for PK, and 0.18-0.24 D for TK. For Anterion, R ranged between 0.19 and 0.20 D for Sim K, 0.02 D for PK, and 0.20-0.21 D for TK. In general, the control group showed slightly higher S and R values than the post-refractive surgery group for TK and astigmatism measurements obtained with both devices. IOLMaster 700 and Anterion demonstrated good repeatability for simulated and total keratometry measurements obtained in healthy and post-refractive eyes. Moreover, the keratometry repeatability was comparable between healthy and post-refractive eyes using both SS-OCT devices.
AbstractList To analyze the keratometry repeatability obtained with two swept-source devices in healthy and post-refractive surgery eyes.PURPOSETo analyze the keratometry repeatability obtained with two swept-source devices in healthy and post-refractive surgery eyes.One hundred volunteers aged between 20 and 55 years were recruited for this study including both healthy and post-refractive surgery eyes. Patients included in the post-refractive surgery group underwent Laser-Assisted in Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) or Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK). Three consecutive measurements were taken with the IOLMaster 700 and Anterion and the evaluated measurements were simulated keratometry (Sim K), posterior keratometry (PK), and total keratometry (TK). Repeatability was assessed through the intra-subject standard deviation (Sw), repeatability limit (R), and variability coefficient (CoV).METHODSOne hundred volunteers aged between 20 and 55 years were recruited for this study including both healthy and post-refractive surgery eyes. Patients included in the post-refractive surgery group underwent Laser-Assisted in Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) or Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK). Three consecutive measurements were taken with the IOLMaster 700 and Anterion and the evaluated measurements were simulated keratometry (Sim K), posterior keratometry (PK), and total keratometry (TK). Repeatability was assessed through the intra-subject standard deviation (Sw), repeatability limit (R), and variability coefficient (CoV).Fifty patients were included in the control and post-refractive surgery groups, respectively. Similar repeatability was obtained for healthy and post-refractive surgery eyes using both devices. For IOLMaster 700, R ranged between 0.16 and 0.22 D for Sim K, 0.09-0.11 D for PK, and 0.18-0.24 D for TK. For Anterion, R ranged between 0.19 and 0.20 D for Sim K, 0.02 D for PK, and 0.20-0.21 D for TK. In general, the control group showed slightly higher Sw and R values than the post-refractive surgery group for TK and astigmatism measurements obtained with both devices.RESULTSFifty patients were included in the control and post-refractive surgery groups, respectively. Similar repeatability was obtained for healthy and post-refractive surgery eyes using both devices. For IOLMaster 700, R ranged between 0.16 and 0.22 D for Sim K, 0.09-0.11 D for PK, and 0.18-0.24 D for TK. For Anterion, R ranged between 0.19 and 0.20 D for Sim K, 0.02 D for PK, and 0.20-0.21 D for TK. In general, the control group showed slightly higher Sw and R values than the post-refractive surgery group for TK and astigmatism measurements obtained with both devices.IOLMaster 700 and Anterion demonstrated good repeatability for simulated and total keratometry measurements obtained in healthy and post-refractive eyes. Moreover, the keratometry repeatability was comparable between healthy and post-refractive eyes using both SS-OCT devices.CONCLUSIONSIOLMaster 700 and Anterion demonstrated good repeatability for simulated and total keratometry measurements obtained in healthy and post-refractive eyes. Moreover, the keratometry repeatability was comparable between healthy and post-refractive eyes using both SS-OCT devices.
To analyze the keratometry repeatability obtained with two swept-source devices in healthy and post-refractive surgery eyes. One hundred volunteers aged between 20 and 55 years were recruited for this study including both healthy and post-refractive surgery eyes. Patients included in the post-refractive surgery group underwent Laser-Assisted in Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) or Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK). Three consecutive measurements were taken with the IOLMaster 700 and Anterion and the evaluated measurements were simulated keratometry (Sim K), posterior keratometry (PK), and total keratometry (TK). Repeatability was assessed through the intra-subject standard deviation (S ), repeatability limit (R), and variability coefficient (CoV). Fifty patients were included in the control and post-refractive surgery groups, respectively. Similar repeatability was obtained for healthy and post-refractive surgery eyes using both devices. For IOLMaster 700, R ranged between 0.16 and 0.22 D for Sim K, 0.09-0.11 D for PK, and 0.18-0.24 D for TK. For Anterion, R ranged between 0.19 and 0.20 D for Sim K, 0.02 D for PK, and 0.20-0.21 D for TK. In general, the control group showed slightly higher S and R values than the post-refractive surgery group for TK and astigmatism measurements obtained with both devices. IOLMaster 700 and Anterion demonstrated good repeatability for simulated and total keratometry measurements obtained in healthy and post-refractive eyes. Moreover, the keratometry repeatability was comparable between healthy and post-refractive eyes using both SS-OCT devices.
Author Nieto-Fernández, Juan Carlos
Martínez-Albert, Noelia
García-Marqués, José Vicente
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Noelia
  orcidid: 0000-0002-6900-6561
  surname: Martínez-Albert
  fullname: Martínez-Albert, Noelia
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Juan Carlos
  surname: Nieto-Fernández
  fullname: Nieto-Fernández, Juan Carlos
– sequence: 3
  givenname: José Vicente
  surname: García-Marqués
  fullname: García-Marqués, José Vicente
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40817927$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNo90cFO3DAQgGGrWtRdoC_QQ-UjF9OxncROb2hFCwKpF5C4WY49KamSOLUdUN6-aXfhNJdv5jD_KdmMYURCPnO45ADqawIouGIgSgaVriXTH8iOF7JkCsTThuxACc60FE9bcprSb1i9LPlHsi1Ac1ULtSPhDqPNYcAcFxpxQptt0_VdXmg30me0fX5eqB09nULKLGIbrcvdC9I0x1-4LuGC6Ru11IVhsrFLYaShpfk10PSKU2YpzNEh9fjSOUzn5KS1fcJPx3lGHr9fP-xv2P3PH7f7q3vmRFllJhQHXfjKo2tV60pdV9LWvqo1NlLoQjVCofDe8lrWrQStal6A9NCKQjbSyTNycbg7xfBnxpTN0CWHfW9HDHMyUhTAZSm1WumXI52bAb2ZYjfYuJi3J61AHICLIaX1Be-Eg_lXwhxKmLWE-V_CaPkXrq58pg
Cites_doi 10.1007/S00417-019-04443-7
10.1016/J.JCRS.2018.10.033
10.1016/J.JCRS.2019.05.020
10.1016/J.JCRS.2012.08.036
10.1016/J.JCRS.2010.07.039
10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90153-7
10.1097/J.JCRS.0000000000000136
10.1016/J.JCRS.2015.11.036
10.1080/17434440.2019.1557517
10.1186/S12886-016-0391-1
10.1016/J.JCRS.2015.07.035
10.1016/J.SURVOPHTHAL.2010.03.001
10.1038/S41598-021-94319-W
10.1097/ICU.0000000000000330
10.1016/J.JCRS.2018.02.015
10.3928/1081-597X-20070501-07
10.1177/1120672120944022
10.1177/1120672118804950
10.1016/J.JCRS.2015.11.046
10.1007/S00417-016-3555-Z
10.1016/J.JCRS.2013.06.027
10.1155/2017/1516395
10.3928/1081597X-20180214-02
10.1016/J.VISRES.2005.09.021
10.1111/J.1755-3768.2009.01732.X
10.3928/1081-597X-20060101-15
10.1155/2017/6181405
10.1038/S41598-020-79674-4
10.1111/J.1475-1313.2011.00851.X
10.3928/1081597X-20181119-01
10.1097/J.JCRS.0000000000000734
10.1038/S41433-020-01245-8
10.1007/S10792-016-0380-7
10.1177/096228029900800204
10.1016/J.JCRS.2015.06.029
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1007/s00417-025-06893-8
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1435-702X
ExternalDocumentID 40817927
10_1007_s00417_025_06893_8
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
.86
.VR
06C
06D
0R~
0VY
199
1N0
203
29I
29~
2J2
2JN
2JY
2KG
2KM
2LR
2~H
30V
4.4
406
408
409
40D
40E
5VS
67Z
6NX
78A
8UJ
95-
95.
95~
96X
AABHQ
AACDK
AAHNG
AAIAL
AAJBT
AAJKR
AANZL
AAPKM
AARTL
AASML
AATNV
AATVU
AAUYE
AAWCG
AAYIU
AAYQN
AAYXX
AAYZH
ABAKF
ABBBX
ABBRH
ABBXA
ABDBE
ABDZT
ABECU
ABFSG
ABFTV
ABHLI
ABHQN
ABIPD
ABJNI
ABJOX
ABKCH
ABKTR
ABLJU
ABMNI
ABMQK
ABNWP
ABPLI
ABQBU
ABRTQ
ABSXP
ABTEG
ABTKH
ABTMW
ABWNU
ABXPI
ACAOD
ACDTI
ACGFS
ACHSB
ACHXU
ACKNC
ACMDZ
ACMLO
ACOKC
ACOMO
ACPIV
ACPRK
ACSTC
ACZOJ
ADBBV
ADHIR
ADKNI
ADKPE
ADRFC
ADTPH
ADURQ
ADYFF
ADZKW
AEFQL
AEGAL
AEGNC
AEJHL
AEJRE
AEMSY
AENEX
AEOHA
AEPYU
AESKC
AETLH
AEVLU
AEXYK
AEZWR
AFBBN
AFDZB
AFHIU
AFLOW
AFOHR
AFQWF
AFWTZ
AFZKB
AGAYW
AGDGC
AGJBK
AGMZJ
AGQEE
AGQMX
AGRTI
AGWIL
AGWZB
AGYKE
AHAVH
AHBYD
AHIZS
AHKAY
AHMBA
AHPBZ
AHSBF
AHWEU
AHYZX
AIAKS
AIGIU
AIIXL
AILAN
AITGF
AIXLP
AJRNO
AJZVZ
AKMHD
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALWAN
AMKLP
AMXSW
AMYLF
AOCGG
ARMRJ
ATHPR
AXYYD
AYFIA
AZFZN
B-.
BA0
BENPR
BGNMA
BSONS
CITATION
CSCUP
DDRTE
DL5
DNIVK
DPUIP
EBLON
EBS
EIOEI
ESBYG
F5P
FEDTE
FERAY
FFXSO
FIGPU
FINBP
FNLPD
FRRFC
FWDCC
G-Y
G-Z
GGCAI
GGRSB
GJIRD
GNWQR
GQ7
GQ8
GXS
HF~
HG5
HG6
HMJXF
HQYDN
HRMNR
HVGLF
HZ~
I09
IHE
IJ-
IKXTQ
IMOTQ
ITM
IWAJR
IXC
IZIGR
IZQ
I~X
I~Z
J-C
J0Z
JBSCW
JCJTX
JZLTJ
KDC
KOV
KPH
LAS
LLZTM
M4Y
MA-
N9A
NB0
NPVJJ
NQJWS
NU0
O93
O9G
O9I
O9J
OAM
P19
P2P
P9S
PF0
PT4
PT5
QOK
QOR
QOS
R89
R9I
RHV
ROL
RPX
RRX
RSV
S16
S1Z
S27
S37
S3B
SAP
SDH
SDM
SHX
SISQX
SJYHP
SMD
SNE
SNPRN
SNX
SOHCF
SOJ
SPISZ
SRMVM
SSLCW
SSXJD
STPWE
SZ9
SZN
T13
TSG
TSK
TSV
TT1
TUC
U2A
U9L
UG4
UOJIU
UTJUX
UZXMN
VC2
VFIZW
W23
W48
WJK
WK8
YLTOR
Z45
ZMTXR
ZOVNA
~EX
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-271084d6decf7fc58963a9d698eb32847b27e2dda1939f308791403d0f243b3c3
ISSN 0721-832X
1435-702X
IngestDate Sat Aug 16 17:00:59 EDT 2025
Sun Aug 17 02:25:12 EDT 2025
Wed Oct 01 05:40:44 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords Repeatability
Keratometry
Swept-source technology
Refractive surgery
Language English
License 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c256t-271084d6decf7fc58963a9d698eb32847b27e2dda1939f308791403d0f243b3c3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-6900-6561
PMID 40817927
PQID 3240135387
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_3240135387
pubmed_primary_40817927
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00417_025_06893_8
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2025-08-16
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-08-16
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2025
  text: 2025-08-16
  day: 16
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Germany
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Germany
PublicationTitle Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology
PublicationTitleAlternate Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
PublicationYear 2025
References G Savini (6893_CR9) 2007; 23
V Vrijman (6893_CR15) 2019; 35
M Sano (6893_CR2) 2016; 16
CE Perez-Straziota (6893_CR10) 2017; 28
R Herber (6893_CR33) 2022; 48
G Savini (6893_CR35) 2018; 44
T Ferrer-Blasco (6893_CR27) 2017; 255
JM Bland (6893_CR25) 1999; 8
BR LaHood (6893_CR23) 2018; 34
6893_CR19
R Gutmark (6893_CR4) 2010; 55
S Fityo (6893_CR16) 2016; 42
G Savini (6893_CR20) 2011; 37
C McAlinden (6893_CR22) 2011; 31
6893_CR30
M Shajari (6893_CR17) 2020; 46
O Reitblat (6893_CR3) 2016; 42
DD Koch (6893_CR7) 2012; 38
6893_CR24
EF Jarade (6893_CR8) 2006; 22
C Palomino-Bautista (6893_CR14) 2019; 29
C McAlinden (6893_CR26) 2015; 41
M Dubbelman (6893_CR6) 2006; 46
N Martínez-Albert (6893_CR32) 2019; 16
B Seitz (6893_CR11) 1999; 106
DD Koch (6893_CR1) 2013; 39
L Wang (6893_CR13) 2019; 45
LS Cheng (6893_CR5) 2011; 89
6893_CR29
M Garza-Leon (6893_CR28) 2017; 37
EJ Kim (6893_CR18) 2015; 41
G Savini (6893_CR21) 2021; 35
S Srivannaboon (6893_CR12) 2019; 257
W Lu (6893_CR31) 2019; 45
P Tañá-Rivero (6893_CR34) 2021; 31
References_xml – volume: 257
  start-page: 2677
  year: 2019
  ident: 6893_CR12
  publication-title: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1007/S00417-019-04443-7
– volume: 45
  start-page: 298
  year: 2019
  ident: 6893_CR31
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/J.JCRS.2018.10.033
– volume: 45
  start-page: 1416
  year: 2019
  ident: 6893_CR13
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/J.JCRS.2019.05.020
– volume: 38
  start-page: 2080
  year: 2012
  ident: 6893_CR7
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/J.JCRS.2012.08.036
– volume: 37
  start-page: 302
  year: 2011
  ident: 6893_CR20
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/J.JCRS.2010.07.039
– volume: 106
  start-page: 693
  year: 1999
  ident: 6893_CR11
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
  doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90153-7
– volume: 46
  start-page: 675
  year: 2020
  ident: 6893_CR17
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1097/J.JCRS.0000000000000136
– volume: 42
  start-page: 217
  year: 2016
  ident: 6893_CR3
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/J.JCRS.2015.11.036
– volume: 16
  start-page: 63
  year: 2019
  ident: 6893_CR32
  publication-title: Expert Rev Med Devices
  doi: 10.1080/17434440.2019.1557517
– volume: 16
  start-page: 1
  year: 2016
  ident: 6893_CR2
  publication-title: BMC Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1186/S12886-016-0391-1
– volume: 41
  start-page: 2731
  year: 2015
  ident: 6893_CR18
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/J.JCRS.2015.07.035
– volume: 55
  start-page: 481
  year: 2010
  ident: 6893_CR4
  publication-title: Surv Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1016/J.SURVOPHTHAL.2010.03.001
– ident: 6893_CR19
  doi: 10.1038/S41598-021-94319-W
– volume: 28
  start-page: 16
  year: 2017
  ident: 6893_CR10
  publication-title: Curr Opin Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000330
– volume: 44
  start-page: 471
  year: 2018
  ident: 6893_CR35
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/J.JCRS.2018.02.015
– volume: 23
  start-page: 461
  year: 2007
  ident: 6893_CR9
  publication-title: J Refract Surg
  doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-20070501-07
– volume: 31
  start-page: 1709
  year: 2021
  ident: 6893_CR34
  publication-title: Eur J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1177/1120672120944022
– volume: 29
  start-page: 593
  year: 2019
  ident: 6893_CR14
  publication-title: Eur J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1177/1120672118804950
– volume: 42
  start-page: 569
  year: 2016
  ident: 6893_CR16
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/J.JCRS.2015.11.046
– volume: 255
  start-page: 343
  year: 2017
  ident: 6893_CR27
  publication-title: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1007/S00417-016-3555-Z
– volume: 39
  start-page: 1803
  year: 2013
  ident: 6893_CR1
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/J.JCRS.2013.06.027
– ident: 6893_CR29
  doi: 10.1155/2017/1516395
– volume: 34
  start-page: 331
  year: 2018
  ident: 6893_CR23
  publication-title: J Refract Surg
  doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20180214-02
– volume: 46
  start-page: 993
  year: 2006
  ident: 6893_CR6
  publication-title: Vis Res
  doi: 10.1016/J.VISRES.2005.09.021
– volume: 89
  start-page: 417
  year: 2011
  ident: 6893_CR5
  publication-title: Acta Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1111/J.1755-3768.2009.01732.X
– volume: 22
  start-page: 75
  year: 2006
  ident: 6893_CR8
  publication-title: J Refract Surg
  doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-20060101-15
– ident: 6893_CR30
  doi: 10.1155/2017/6181405
– ident: 6893_CR24
  doi: 10.1038/S41598-020-79674-4
– volume: 31
  start-page: 330
  year: 2011
  ident: 6893_CR22
  publication-title: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt
  doi: 10.1111/J.1475-1313.2011.00851.X
– volume: 35
  start-page: 54
  year: 2019
  ident: 6893_CR15
  publication-title: J Refract Surg
  doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20181119-01
– volume: 48
  start-page: 190
  year: 2022
  ident: 6893_CR33
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1097/J.JCRS.0000000000000734
– volume: 35
  start-page: 307
  year: 2021
  ident: 6893_CR21
  publication-title: Eye (Lond)
  doi: 10.1038/S41433-020-01245-8
– volume: 37
  start-page: 1133
  year: 2017
  ident: 6893_CR28
  publication-title: Int Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1007/S10792-016-0380-7
– volume: 8
  start-page: 135
  year: 1999
  ident: 6893_CR25
  publication-title: Stat Methods Med Res
  doi: 10.1177/096228029900800204
– volume: 41
  start-page: 2598
  year: 2015
  ident: 6893_CR26
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/J.JCRS.2015.06.029
SSID ssj0004351
Score 2.4441311
SecondaryResourceType online_first
Snippet To analyze the keratometry repeatability obtained with two swept-source devices in healthy and post-refractive surgery eyes. One hundred volunteers aged...
To analyze the keratometry repeatability obtained with two swept-source devices in healthy and post-refractive surgery eyes.PURPOSETo analyze the keratometry...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Title Keratometry repeatability in healthy and post-refractive surgery eyes: a comparison of two swept-source devices
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40817927
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3240135387
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVLSH
  databaseName: SpringerLink Journals
  customDbUrl:
  mediaType: online
  eissn: 1435-702X
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0004351
  issn: 0721-832X
  databaseCode: AFBBN
  dateStart: 19970101
  isFulltext: true
  providerName: Library Specific Holdings
– providerCode: PRVAVX
  databaseName: SpringerLINK - Czech Republic Consortium
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1435-702X
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0004351
  issn: 0721-832X
  databaseCode: AGYKE
  dateStart: 19970101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://link.springer.com
  providerName: Springer Nature
– providerCode: PRVAVX
  databaseName: SpringerLink Journals (ICM)
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1435-702X
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0004351
  issn: 0721-832X
  databaseCode: U2A
  dateStart: 19970101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://www.springerlink.com/journals/
  providerName: Springer Nature
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9tAEF5cB0ovpe84fbCF3sQWe_XuzUmbhJT4lBTfxEoaEYMjufY6Jflt_XGd2V3LdtJA04uwhRgtmo957cy3jH3qwyCBOIxEMCgSEcg4EnlfggjRW5WUhFRAw8mno-j4PDgZh-NO5_dG19JS55-Lm7_OlfyPVvEe6pWmZB-g2VYo3sDfqF-8oobx-k86_k6MyM0l6Pk1Ff_RrFrWbTPLZyccLb3SrFlogb7QjERdgbeww9AeXNuWOOV60d15hJ7-1XhEaaqFLe7TbBVZlM1Q9miuoAJT71eWvta0LLajlvTerfMDmtmFvlDTy61CPtEYmM36rzXciCExbmm7nwTTSesyRhPQjaCat3l2sCp8nyzRPB2o-bRpU4MjXIwVqAQK_7m0rQCr7Q77z_sxoa5U2Kx5yJCKuHYk05lGzFsF2qKx9WLWdAdEvtm39-44BtsLQtSx6JWNxAgjNZGs3eBq6_-Wd2x7Flt-ZyMjQxmZkZElj9gOYjySXbYzPNzfH63ncn1z_Ge7Wje0ZUY376xkOzC6J9sxUc_ZM_bUpSt8aLH3nHWgfsEen7qGjJes2YAg34Ign9TcQZAjFPgtCHIHQU4Q_MIVXwOQNxVHAPJNAHIHwFfs_PDb2cGxcGd4iAKDaS0kRrBJUEYlFFVcFWGCBl-lZZQmkPsUGuUyBlmWChOJtCJ6ypQYJMt-JQM_9wv_NevWTQ27jKsyxeiziAe-kkEuUUQukxAqzBIGUSXTHvNWHzCbWaqW7H6l9djH1TfO0KLSNpmqoVkuMqKopNNgkrjH3tiP38oLMIKOUxnvPehdb9mTNYrfsa6eL-E9xrI6_-Ag8wd9bpww
linkProvider Library Specific Holdings
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Keratometry+repeatability+in+healthy+and+post-refractive+surgery+eyes%3A+a+comparison+of+two+swept-source+devices&rft.jtitle=Graefe%27s+archive+for+clinical+and+experimental+ophthalmology&rft.au=Mart%C3%ADnez-Albert%2C+Noelia&rft.au=Nieto-Fern%C3%A1ndez%2C+Juan+Carlos&rft.au=Garc%C3%ADa-Marqu%C3%A9s%2C+Jos%C3%A9+Vicente&rft.date=2025-08-16&rft.issn=0721-832X&rft.eissn=1435-702X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs00417-025-06893-8&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1007_s00417_025_06893_8
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0721-832X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0721-832X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0721-832X&client=summon