Keratometry repeatability in healthy and post-refractive surgery eyes: a comparison of two swept-source devices
To analyze the keratometry repeatability obtained with two swept-source devices in healthy and post-refractive surgery eyes. One hundred volunteers aged between 20 and 55 years were recruited for this study including both healthy and post-refractive surgery eyes. Patients included in the post-refrac...
Saved in:
Published in | Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Germany
16.08.2025
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0721-832X 1435-702X 1435-702X |
DOI | 10.1007/s00417-025-06893-8 |
Cover
Abstract | To analyze the keratometry repeatability obtained with two swept-source devices in healthy and post-refractive surgery eyes.
One hundred volunteers aged between 20 and 55 years were recruited for this study including both healthy and post-refractive surgery eyes. Patients included in the post-refractive surgery group underwent Laser-Assisted in Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) or Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK). Three consecutive measurements were taken with the IOLMaster 700 and Anterion and the evaluated measurements were simulated keratometry (Sim K), posterior keratometry (PK), and total keratometry (TK). Repeatability was assessed through the intra-subject standard deviation (S
), repeatability limit (R), and variability coefficient (CoV).
Fifty patients were included in the control and post-refractive surgery groups, respectively. Similar repeatability was obtained for healthy and post-refractive surgery eyes using both devices. For IOLMaster 700, R ranged between 0.16 and 0.22 D for Sim K, 0.09-0.11 D for PK, and 0.18-0.24 D for TK. For Anterion, R ranged between 0.19 and 0.20 D for Sim K, 0.02 D for PK, and 0.20-0.21 D for TK. In general, the control group showed slightly higher S
and R values than the post-refractive surgery group for TK and astigmatism measurements obtained with both devices.
IOLMaster 700 and Anterion demonstrated good repeatability for simulated and total keratometry measurements obtained in healthy and post-refractive eyes. Moreover, the keratometry repeatability was comparable between healthy and post-refractive eyes using both SS-OCT devices. |
---|---|
AbstractList | To analyze the keratometry repeatability obtained with two swept-source devices in healthy and post-refractive surgery eyes.PURPOSETo analyze the keratometry repeatability obtained with two swept-source devices in healthy and post-refractive surgery eyes.One hundred volunteers aged between 20 and 55 years were recruited for this study including both healthy and post-refractive surgery eyes. Patients included in the post-refractive surgery group underwent Laser-Assisted in Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) or Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK). Three consecutive measurements were taken with the IOLMaster 700 and Anterion and the evaluated measurements were simulated keratometry (Sim K), posterior keratometry (PK), and total keratometry (TK). Repeatability was assessed through the intra-subject standard deviation (Sw), repeatability limit (R), and variability coefficient (CoV).METHODSOne hundred volunteers aged between 20 and 55 years were recruited for this study including both healthy and post-refractive surgery eyes. Patients included in the post-refractive surgery group underwent Laser-Assisted in Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) or Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK). Three consecutive measurements were taken with the IOLMaster 700 and Anterion and the evaluated measurements were simulated keratometry (Sim K), posterior keratometry (PK), and total keratometry (TK). Repeatability was assessed through the intra-subject standard deviation (Sw), repeatability limit (R), and variability coefficient (CoV).Fifty patients were included in the control and post-refractive surgery groups, respectively. Similar repeatability was obtained for healthy and post-refractive surgery eyes using both devices. For IOLMaster 700, R ranged between 0.16 and 0.22 D for Sim K, 0.09-0.11 D for PK, and 0.18-0.24 D for TK. For Anterion, R ranged between 0.19 and 0.20 D for Sim K, 0.02 D for PK, and 0.20-0.21 D for TK. In general, the control group showed slightly higher Sw and R values than the post-refractive surgery group for TK and astigmatism measurements obtained with both devices.RESULTSFifty patients were included in the control and post-refractive surgery groups, respectively. Similar repeatability was obtained for healthy and post-refractive surgery eyes using both devices. For IOLMaster 700, R ranged between 0.16 and 0.22 D for Sim K, 0.09-0.11 D for PK, and 0.18-0.24 D for TK. For Anterion, R ranged between 0.19 and 0.20 D for Sim K, 0.02 D for PK, and 0.20-0.21 D for TK. In general, the control group showed slightly higher Sw and R values than the post-refractive surgery group for TK and astigmatism measurements obtained with both devices.IOLMaster 700 and Anterion demonstrated good repeatability for simulated and total keratometry measurements obtained in healthy and post-refractive eyes. Moreover, the keratometry repeatability was comparable between healthy and post-refractive eyes using both SS-OCT devices.CONCLUSIONSIOLMaster 700 and Anterion demonstrated good repeatability for simulated and total keratometry measurements obtained in healthy and post-refractive eyes. Moreover, the keratometry repeatability was comparable between healthy and post-refractive eyes using both SS-OCT devices. To analyze the keratometry repeatability obtained with two swept-source devices in healthy and post-refractive surgery eyes. One hundred volunteers aged between 20 and 55 years were recruited for this study including both healthy and post-refractive surgery eyes. Patients included in the post-refractive surgery group underwent Laser-Assisted in Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) or Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK). Three consecutive measurements were taken with the IOLMaster 700 and Anterion and the evaluated measurements were simulated keratometry (Sim K), posterior keratometry (PK), and total keratometry (TK). Repeatability was assessed through the intra-subject standard deviation (S ), repeatability limit (R), and variability coefficient (CoV). Fifty patients were included in the control and post-refractive surgery groups, respectively. Similar repeatability was obtained for healthy and post-refractive surgery eyes using both devices. For IOLMaster 700, R ranged between 0.16 and 0.22 D for Sim K, 0.09-0.11 D for PK, and 0.18-0.24 D for TK. For Anterion, R ranged between 0.19 and 0.20 D for Sim K, 0.02 D for PK, and 0.20-0.21 D for TK. In general, the control group showed slightly higher S and R values than the post-refractive surgery group for TK and astigmatism measurements obtained with both devices. IOLMaster 700 and Anterion demonstrated good repeatability for simulated and total keratometry measurements obtained in healthy and post-refractive eyes. Moreover, the keratometry repeatability was comparable between healthy and post-refractive eyes using both SS-OCT devices. |
Author | Nieto-Fernández, Juan Carlos Martínez-Albert, Noelia García-Marqués, José Vicente |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Noelia orcidid: 0000-0002-6900-6561 surname: Martínez-Albert fullname: Martínez-Albert, Noelia – sequence: 2 givenname: Juan Carlos surname: Nieto-Fernández fullname: Nieto-Fernández, Juan Carlos – sequence: 3 givenname: José Vicente surname: García-Marqués fullname: García-Marqués, José Vicente |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40817927$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNo90cFO3DAQgGGrWtRdoC_QQ-UjF9OxncROb2hFCwKpF5C4WY49KamSOLUdUN6-aXfhNJdv5jD_KdmMYURCPnO45ADqawIouGIgSgaVriXTH8iOF7JkCsTThuxACc60FE9bcprSb1i9LPlHsi1Ac1ULtSPhDqPNYcAcFxpxQptt0_VdXmg30me0fX5eqB09nULKLGIbrcvdC9I0x1-4LuGC6Ru11IVhsrFLYaShpfk10PSKU2YpzNEh9fjSOUzn5KS1fcJPx3lGHr9fP-xv2P3PH7f7q3vmRFllJhQHXfjKo2tV60pdV9LWvqo1NlLoQjVCofDe8lrWrQStal6A9NCKQjbSyTNycbg7xfBnxpTN0CWHfW9HDHMyUhTAZSm1WumXI52bAb2ZYjfYuJi3J61AHICLIaX1Be-Eg_lXwhxKmLWE-V_CaPkXrq58pg |
Cites_doi | 10.1007/S00417-019-04443-7 10.1016/J.JCRS.2018.10.033 10.1016/J.JCRS.2019.05.020 10.1016/J.JCRS.2012.08.036 10.1016/J.JCRS.2010.07.039 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90153-7 10.1097/J.JCRS.0000000000000136 10.1016/J.JCRS.2015.11.036 10.1080/17434440.2019.1557517 10.1186/S12886-016-0391-1 10.1016/J.JCRS.2015.07.035 10.1016/J.SURVOPHTHAL.2010.03.001 10.1038/S41598-021-94319-W 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000330 10.1016/J.JCRS.2018.02.015 10.3928/1081-597X-20070501-07 10.1177/1120672120944022 10.1177/1120672118804950 10.1016/J.JCRS.2015.11.046 10.1007/S00417-016-3555-Z 10.1016/J.JCRS.2013.06.027 10.1155/2017/1516395 10.3928/1081597X-20180214-02 10.1016/J.VISRES.2005.09.021 10.1111/J.1755-3768.2009.01732.X 10.3928/1081-597X-20060101-15 10.1155/2017/6181405 10.1038/S41598-020-79674-4 10.1111/J.1475-1313.2011.00851.X 10.3928/1081597X-20181119-01 10.1097/J.JCRS.0000000000000734 10.1038/S41433-020-01245-8 10.1007/S10792-016-0380-7 10.1177/096228029900800204 10.1016/J.JCRS.2015.06.029 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1007/s00417-025-06893-8 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic PubMed |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1435-702X |
ExternalDocumentID | 40817927 10_1007_s00417_025_06893_8 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- .86 .VR 06C 06D 0R~ 0VY 199 1N0 203 29I 29~ 2J2 2JN 2JY 2KG 2KM 2LR 2~H 30V 4.4 406 408 409 40D 40E 5VS 67Z 6NX 78A 8UJ 95- 95. 95~ 96X AABHQ AACDK AAHNG AAIAL AAJBT AAJKR AANZL AAPKM AARTL AASML AATNV AATVU AAUYE AAWCG AAYIU AAYQN AAYXX AAYZH ABAKF ABBBX ABBRH ABBXA ABDBE ABDZT ABECU ABFSG ABFTV ABHLI ABHQN ABIPD ABJNI ABJOX ABKCH ABKTR ABLJU ABMNI ABMQK ABNWP ABPLI ABQBU ABRTQ ABSXP ABTEG ABTKH ABTMW ABWNU ABXPI ACAOD ACDTI ACGFS ACHSB ACHXU ACKNC ACMDZ ACMLO ACOKC ACOMO ACPIV ACPRK ACSTC ACZOJ ADBBV ADHIR ADKNI ADKPE ADRFC ADTPH ADURQ ADYFF ADZKW AEFQL AEGAL AEGNC AEJHL AEJRE AEMSY AENEX AEOHA AEPYU AESKC AETLH AEVLU AEXYK AEZWR AFBBN AFDZB AFHIU AFLOW AFOHR AFQWF AFWTZ AFZKB AGAYW AGDGC AGJBK AGMZJ AGQEE AGQMX AGRTI AGWIL AGWZB AGYKE AHAVH AHBYD AHIZS AHKAY AHMBA AHPBZ AHSBF AHWEU AHYZX AIAKS AIGIU AIIXL AILAN AITGF AIXLP AJRNO AJZVZ AKMHD ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALWAN AMKLP AMXSW AMYLF AOCGG ARMRJ ATHPR AXYYD AYFIA AZFZN B-. BA0 BENPR BGNMA BSONS CITATION CSCUP DDRTE DL5 DNIVK DPUIP EBLON EBS EIOEI ESBYG F5P FEDTE FERAY FFXSO FIGPU FINBP FNLPD FRRFC FWDCC G-Y G-Z GGCAI GGRSB GJIRD GNWQR GQ7 GQ8 GXS HF~ HG5 HG6 HMJXF HQYDN HRMNR HVGLF HZ~ I09 IHE IJ- IKXTQ IMOTQ ITM IWAJR IXC IZIGR IZQ I~X I~Z J-C J0Z JBSCW JCJTX JZLTJ KDC KOV KPH LAS LLZTM M4Y MA- N9A NB0 NPVJJ NQJWS NU0 O93 O9G O9I O9J OAM P19 P2P P9S PF0 PT4 PT5 QOK QOR QOS R89 R9I RHV ROL RPX RRX RSV S16 S1Z S27 S37 S3B SAP SDH SDM SHX SISQX SJYHP SMD SNE SNPRN SNX SOHCF SOJ SPISZ SRMVM SSLCW SSXJD STPWE SZ9 SZN T13 TSG TSK TSV TT1 TUC U2A U9L UG4 UOJIU UTJUX UZXMN VC2 VFIZW W23 W48 WJK WK8 YLTOR Z45 ZMTXR ZOVNA ~EX NPM 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-271084d6decf7fc58963a9d698eb32847b27e2dda1939f308791403d0f243b3c3 |
ISSN | 0721-832X 1435-702X |
IngestDate | Sat Aug 16 17:00:59 EDT 2025 Sun Aug 17 02:25:12 EDT 2025 Wed Oct 01 05:40:44 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Keywords | Repeatability Keratometry Swept-source technology Refractive surgery |
Language | English |
License | 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature. |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c256t-271084d6decf7fc58963a9d698eb32847b27e2dda1939f308791403d0f243b3c3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-6900-6561 |
PMID | 40817927 |
PQID | 3240135387 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_3240135387 pubmed_primary_40817927 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00417_025_06893_8 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2025-08-16 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2025-08-16 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2025 text: 2025-08-16 day: 16 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Germany |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Germany |
PublicationTitle | Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol |
PublicationYear | 2025 |
References | G Savini (6893_CR9) 2007; 23 V Vrijman (6893_CR15) 2019; 35 M Sano (6893_CR2) 2016; 16 CE Perez-Straziota (6893_CR10) 2017; 28 R Herber (6893_CR33) 2022; 48 G Savini (6893_CR35) 2018; 44 T Ferrer-Blasco (6893_CR27) 2017; 255 JM Bland (6893_CR25) 1999; 8 BR LaHood (6893_CR23) 2018; 34 6893_CR19 R Gutmark (6893_CR4) 2010; 55 S Fityo (6893_CR16) 2016; 42 G Savini (6893_CR20) 2011; 37 C McAlinden (6893_CR22) 2011; 31 6893_CR30 M Shajari (6893_CR17) 2020; 46 O Reitblat (6893_CR3) 2016; 42 DD Koch (6893_CR7) 2012; 38 6893_CR24 EF Jarade (6893_CR8) 2006; 22 C Palomino-Bautista (6893_CR14) 2019; 29 C McAlinden (6893_CR26) 2015; 41 M Dubbelman (6893_CR6) 2006; 46 N Martínez-Albert (6893_CR32) 2019; 16 B Seitz (6893_CR11) 1999; 106 DD Koch (6893_CR1) 2013; 39 L Wang (6893_CR13) 2019; 45 LS Cheng (6893_CR5) 2011; 89 6893_CR29 M Garza-Leon (6893_CR28) 2017; 37 EJ Kim (6893_CR18) 2015; 41 G Savini (6893_CR21) 2021; 35 S Srivannaboon (6893_CR12) 2019; 257 W Lu (6893_CR31) 2019; 45 P Tañá-Rivero (6893_CR34) 2021; 31 |
References_xml | – volume: 257 start-page: 2677 year: 2019 ident: 6893_CR12 publication-title: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol doi: 10.1007/S00417-019-04443-7 – volume: 45 start-page: 298 year: 2019 ident: 6893_CR31 publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg doi: 10.1016/J.JCRS.2018.10.033 – volume: 45 start-page: 1416 year: 2019 ident: 6893_CR13 publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg doi: 10.1016/J.JCRS.2019.05.020 – volume: 38 start-page: 2080 year: 2012 ident: 6893_CR7 publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg doi: 10.1016/J.JCRS.2012.08.036 – volume: 37 start-page: 302 year: 2011 ident: 6893_CR20 publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg doi: 10.1016/J.JCRS.2010.07.039 – volume: 106 start-page: 693 year: 1999 ident: 6893_CR11 publication-title: Ophthalmology doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90153-7 – volume: 46 start-page: 675 year: 2020 ident: 6893_CR17 publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg doi: 10.1097/J.JCRS.0000000000000136 – volume: 42 start-page: 217 year: 2016 ident: 6893_CR3 publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg doi: 10.1016/J.JCRS.2015.11.036 – volume: 16 start-page: 63 year: 2019 ident: 6893_CR32 publication-title: Expert Rev Med Devices doi: 10.1080/17434440.2019.1557517 – volume: 16 start-page: 1 year: 2016 ident: 6893_CR2 publication-title: BMC Ophthalmol doi: 10.1186/S12886-016-0391-1 – volume: 41 start-page: 2731 year: 2015 ident: 6893_CR18 publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg doi: 10.1016/J.JCRS.2015.07.035 – volume: 55 start-page: 481 year: 2010 ident: 6893_CR4 publication-title: Surv Ophthalmol doi: 10.1016/J.SURVOPHTHAL.2010.03.001 – ident: 6893_CR19 doi: 10.1038/S41598-021-94319-W – volume: 28 start-page: 16 year: 2017 ident: 6893_CR10 publication-title: Curr Opin Ophthalmol doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000330 – volume: 44 start-page: 471 year: 2018 ident: 6893_CR35 publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg doi: 10.1016/J.JCRS.2018.02.015 – volume: 23 start-page: 461 year: 2007 ident: 6893_CR9 publication-title: J Refract Surg doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-20070501-07 – volume: 31 start-page: 1709 year: 2021 ident: 6893_CR34 publication-title: Eur J Ophthalmol doi: 10.1177/1120672120944022 – volume: 29 start-page: 593 year: 2019 ident: 6893_CR14 publication-title: Eur J Ophthalmol doi: 10.1177/1120672118804950 – volume: 42 start-page: 569 year: 2016 ident: 6893_CR16 publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg doi: 10.1016/J.JCRS.2015.11.046 – volume: 255 start-page: 343 year: 2017 ident: 6893_CR27 publication-title: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol doi: 10.1007/S00417-016-3555-Z – volume: 39 start-page: 1803 year: 2013 ident: 6893_CR1 publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg doi: 10.1016/J.JCRS.2013.06.027 – ident: 6893_CR29 doi: 10.1155/2017/1516395 – volume: 34 start-page: 331 year: 2018 ident: 6893_CR23 publication-title: J Refract Surg doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20180214-02 – volume: 46 start-page: 993 year: 2006 ident: 6893_CR6 publication-title: Vis Res doi: 10.1016/J.VISRES.2005.09.021 – volume: 89 start-page: 417 year: 2011 ident: 6893_CR5 publication-title: Acta Ophthalmol doi: 10.1111/J.1755-3768.2009.01732.X – volume: 22 start-page: 75 year: 2006 ident: 6893_CR8 publication-title: J Refract Surg doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-20060101-15 – ident: 6893_CR30 doi: 10.1155/2017/6181405 – ident: 6893_CR24 doi: 10.1038/S41598-020-79674-4 – volume: 31 start-page: 330 year: 2011 ident: 6893_CR22 publication-title: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt doi: 10.1111/J.1475-1313.2011.00851.X – volume: 35 start-page: 54 year: 2019 ident: 6893_CR15 publication-title: J Refract Surg doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20181119-01 – volume: 48 start-page: 190 year: 2022 ident: 6893_CR33 publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg doi: 10.1097/J.JCRS.0000000000000734 – volume: 35 start-page: 307 year: 2021 ident: 6893_CR21 publication-title: Eye (Lond) doi: 10.1038/S41433-020-01245-8 – volume: 37 start-page: 1133 year: 2017 ident: 6893_CR28 publication-title: Int Ophthalmol doi: 10.1007/S10792-016-0380-7 – volume: 8 start-page: 135 year: 1999 ident: 6893_CR25 publication-title: Stat Methods Med Res doi: 10.1177/096228029900800204 – volume: 41 start-page: 2598 year: 2015 ident: 6893_CR26 publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg doi: 10.1016/J.JCRS.2015.06.029 |
SSID | ssj0004351 |
Score | 2.4441311 |
SecondaryResourceType | online_first |
Snippet | To analyze the keratometry repeatability obtained with two swept-source devices in healthy and post-refractive surgery eyes.
One hundred volunteers aged... To analyze the keratometry repeatability obtained with two swept-source devices in healthy and post-refractive surgery eyes.PURPOSETo analyze the keratometry... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database |
Title | Keratometry repeatability in healthy and post-refractive surgery eyes: a comparison of two swept-source devices |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40817927 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3240135387 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVLSH databaseName: SpringerLink Journals customDbUrl: mediaType: online eissn: 1435-702X dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0004351 issn: 0721-832X databaseCode: AFBBN dateStart: 19970101 isFulltext: true providerName: Library Specific Holdings – providerCode: PRVAVX databaseName: SpringerLINK - Czech Republic Consortium customDbUrl: eissn: 1435-702X dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0004351 issn: 0721-832X databaseCode: AGYKE dateStart: 19970101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://link.springer.com providerName: Springer Nature – providerCode: PRVAVX databaseName: SpringerLink Journals (ICM) customDbUrl: eissn: 1435-702X dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0004351 issn: 0721-832X databaseCode: U2A dateStart: 19970101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://www.springerlink.com/journals/ providerName: Springer Nature |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9tAEF5cB0ovpe84fbCF3sQWe_XuzUmbhJT4lBTfxEoaEYMjufY6Jflt_XGd2V3LdtJA04uwhRgtmo957cy3jH3qwyCBOIxEMCgSEcg4EnlfggjRW5WUhFRAw8mno-j4PDgZh-NO5_dG19JS55-Lm7_OlfyPVvEe6pWmZB-g2VYo3sDfqF-8oobx-k86_k6MyM0l6Pk1Ff_RrFrWbTPLZyccLb3SrFlogb7QjERdgbeww9AeXNuWOOV60d15hJ7-1XhEaaqFLe7TbBVZlM1Q9miuoAJT71eWvta0LLajlvTerfMDmtmFvlDTy61CPtEYmM36rzXciCExbmm7nwTTSesyRhPQjaCat3l2sCp8nyzRPB2o-bRpU4MjXIwVqAQK_7m0rQCr7Q77z_sxoa5U2Kx5yJCKuHYk05lGzFsF2qKx9WLWdAdEvtm39-44BtsLQtSx6JWNxAgjNZGs3eBq6_-Wd2x7Flt-ZyMjQxmZkZElj9gOYjySXbYzPNzfH63ncn1z_Ge7Wje0ZUY376xkOzC6J9sxUc_ZM_bUpSt8aLH3nHWgfsEen7qGjJes2YAg34Ign9TcQZAjFPgtCHIHQU4Q_MIVXwOQNxVHAPJNAHIHwFfs_PDb2cGxcGd4iAKDaS0kRrBJUEYlFFVcFWGCBl-lZZQmkPsUGuUyBlmWChOJtCJ6ypQYJMt-JQM_9wv_NevWTQ27jKsyxeiziAe-kkEuUUQukxAqzBIGUSXTHvNWHzCbWaqW7H6l9djH1TfO0KLSNpmqoVkuMqKopNNgkrjH3tiP38oLMIKOUxnvPehdb9mTNYrfsa6eL-E9xrI6_-Ag8wd9bpww |
linkProvider | Library Specific Holdings |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Keratometry+repeatability+in+healthy+and+post-refractive+surgery+eyes%3A+a+comparison+of+two+swept-source+devices&rft.jtitle=Graefe%27s+archive+for+clinical+and+experimental+ophthalmology&rft.au=Mart%C3%ADnez-Albert%2C+Noelia&rft.au=Nieto-Fern%C3%A1ndez%2C+Juan+Carlos&rft.au=Garc%C3%ADa-Marqu%C3%A9s%2C+Jos%C3%A9+Vicente&rft.date=2025-08-16&rft.issn=0721-832X&rft.eissn=1435-702X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs00417-025-06893-8&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1007_s00417_025_06893_8 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0721-832X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0721-832X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0721-832X&client=summon |