Practical Sensitivity Bound for Multiple Phase Estimation with Multi‐Mode N00N$N00N$ States
Quantum enhanced multiple phase estimation is essential for various applications in quantum sensors and imaging. For multiple phase estimation, the sensitivity enhancement is dependent on both quantum probe states and measurement. It is known that multi‐mode N00N$N00N$ states can outperform other pr...
Saved in:
| Published in | Laser & photonics reviews Vol. 16; no. 9 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Weinheim
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.09.2022
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 1863-8880 1863-8899 |
| DOI | 10.1002/lpor.202100682 |
Cover
| Summary: | Quantum enhanced multiple phase estimation is essential for various applications in quantum sensors and imaging. For multiple phase estimation, the sensitivity enhancement is dependent on both quantum probe states and measurement. It is known that multi‐mode N00N$N00N$ states can outperform other probe states for estimating multiple phases. However, it is generally not feasible in practice to implement an optimal measurement to achieve the quantum Cramer–Rao bound (QCRB) under a practical measurement scheme using a multi‐mode beam splitter in interferometric phase estimation. Here, a strategy to achieve the best practical sensitivity by optimizing both mode‐amplitudes of multi‐mode N00N$N00N$ states and a split ratio of a multi‐mode beam splitter is investigated. Then, it is experimentally demonstrated that the best sensitivity is achieved when an amplitude‐balanced multi‐mode N00N$N00N$ state and a multi‐mode beam splitter with an unbalanced ratio are used in three‐mode interferometric phase estimation. The results show that the lower QCRB cannot guarantee better sensitivity under a practical measurement scheme, thus it is more desirable to enhance the practical sensitivity rather than the QCRB. It is believed that this strategy can provide a powerful tool for practical applications in multiple phase estimation.
To achieve the best practical sensitivity of multiple phase estimation in multi‐mode interferometers, both the mode‐amplitude of multi‐mode N00N states and a split ratio of a multi‐mode beam splitter are optimized. An experimental demonstration in a three‐mode interferometer shows that the Cramer–Rao bound plays an important role under practical applications rather than the Quantum Cramer–Rao bound. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
| ISSN: | 1863-8880 1863-8899 |
| DOI: | 10.1002/lpor.202100682 |