Precision dispersive approaches versus unitarized chiral perturbation theory for the lightest scalar resonances $$\sigma /f_0(500) $$ and $$\kappa /K_0^(700)

For several decades, the $\sigma /f_0(500) $ and $\kappa /K_0^*(700) $ resonances have been subject to long-standing debate. Both their existence and properties were controversial until very recently. In this tutorial review, we compare model-independent dispersive and analytic techniques versus uni...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe European physical journal. ST, Special topics Vol. 230; no. 6; pp. 1539 - 1574
Main Authors Peláez, José R., Rodas, Arkaitz, Ruiz de Elvira, Jacobo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Springer 16.06.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1951-6355
1951-6401
1951-6401
DOI10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00142-9

Cover

More Information
Summary:For several decades, the $\sigma /f_0(500) $ and $\kappa /K_0^*(700) $ resonances have been subject to long-standing debate. Both their existence and properties were controversial until very recently. In this tutorial review, we compare model-independent dispersive and analytic techniques versus unitarized Chiral Perturbation Theory, when applied to the lightest scalar mesons $\sigma /f_0(500) $ and $\kappa /K_0^*(700) $. Here, the former have settled the long-standing controversy about the existence of these states, providing a precise determination of their parameters, whereas unitarization of chiral effective theories allows us to understand their nature, spectroscopic classification and dependence on QCD parameters. Here we review in a pedagogical way their uses, advantages and caveats.
Bibliography:AC05-06OR23177; PID2019-106080GB-C21; SC0018416
Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
JLAB-THY-21-3306; DOE/OR/23177-5116; arXiv:2101.06506
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Nuclear Physics (NP)
ISSN:1951-6355
1951-6401
1951-6401
DOI:10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00142-9