The development and optimization of ELISA for the determination of tetrodotoxin

Objective: To optimize the ELISA for the determination of tetrodotoxin. Methods: A competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used. In the ELISA, 100 μl antigen (1. 0 μg/ml) was coated on the microtiter plate for 60 min at 37 C or over night at 4 C. The plate was then washed 3 times w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Medical Colleges of PLA Vol. 22; no. 6; pp. 347 - 351
Main Author 周玉 李岩松 潘风光 柳增善 王哲
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Key Laboratory of Zoonoses, Ministry of Education, Institute of Zoonoses, Jilin University, Changchun 130062, China%College of Light Industry and Economics & Management, Jilin University, Changchun 130062, China 01.12.2007
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1000-1948
DOI10.1016/S1000-1948(08)60016-7

Cover

More Information
Summary:Objective: To optimize the ELISA for the determination of tetrodotoxin. Methods: A competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used. In the ELISA, 100 μl antigen (1. 0 μg/ml) was coated on the microtiter plate for 60 min at 37 C or over night at 4 C. The plate was then washed 3 times with PBS-T for 3-5 s each time. The optimal incubation time for monoclonal antibody (mAb), goat anti-mice IgG peroxidase conjugate and OPD were 30 min, 20 min and 10 min at 37 C, re- spectively. Results.. The detection limit is 0. 05 ng in each well. The curve was linear for TTX doses be- tween 5-5 000 ng/ml (0. 25-250 ng for every assay). The linear regress equation was Y = 0. 30 88X-0.17 41 (R=0.99 01). The average callback for TTX of muscles and gonads were 99.74% and 100.30%, respectively. The sensitivity of optimization ELISA was 5 times than traditional method and the time of 1.8 h were saved. Conclusion: The optimized ELISA is an ideal method for the determination of tetrodotoxin.
Bibliography:tetrodotoxin ; monoclonal antibody; ELISA
tetrodotoxin
monoclonal antibody
R446.6
ELISA
31-1002/R
ISSN:1000-1948
DOI:10.1016/S1000-1948(08)60016-7