Stay close to urban green spaces: current evidence on cultural ecosystem services provision

• Published in: European journal of public health Vol. 31; no. Supplement_2
• Main Authors: Vidal, Diogo Guedes, Teixeira, Catarina Patoilo, Dias, Ricardo Cunha, Fernandes, Cláudia Oliveira, Filho, Walter Leal, Barros, Nelson, Maia, Rui Leandro
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Oxford University Press 03.08.2021
• Subjects: Ecosystem services; Ecosystems; Environmental health; Green infrastructure; Health promotion; Mental health services; Natural environment; Open spaces; Public health; Recreation; Search engines; Social cohesion; Social sciences; Systematic review; Tourism; Urban areas; Urban environments; Urban planning; Well being; Cultural Ecosystem Services; Well-being; Nature Connectedness; Public and Environmental Health; Urban Green Spaces
• ISSN: 1101-1262; 1464-360X
• DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckab120.048

Background Research suggests that access to urban green spaces (UGS) is crucial to support public and environmental health through ecosystem services (ES) provision. However, Cultural ecosystem services (CES), due to their connections to human emotion, a deep meaning, fulfilment, and motivation, have been less studied. CES provision in UGS are central to well-being, contributing to improving mental and physical health outcomes, as well as enhancing social cohesion. Accordingly, this systematic review aims to contribute to a better understanding of CES provision by UGS. Methods A systematic review was carried out in ScienceDirect (Article type = Research articles, years = 2000–2020), PubMed (Article type = journal article, text availability = Full text, year = 2000–2020) and Google Scholar (year = 2000–2020) databases. The keywords used in the search were: ‘urban green space’ OR ‘parks’ AND ‘cultural ecosystem service’ OR ‘cultural services’. Results The search returned 5417 results. After the screening process, 41 articles were reviewed. CES are mainly studied in Europe in the fields of social sciences and landscape management, linking human well-being, urban landscape management, and planning. The dimensions studied are (i) perception and assessment, (ii) recreation and mental and physical health, (iii) aesthetic appreciation/inspiration for culture, art, and design, (iv) tourism, and (v) spiritual experience and sense of place. Conclusions The study points out to the need for efforts to develop relational approaches to help understand what UGS users feel and experience. In particular, how UGS contribute towards promoting healthier and sustainable cities, and to fostering the well-being of people of all ages.