Psychological status of women with miscarriage
Introduction. During pregnancy, a woman becomes vulnerable to develop symptoms of depression and anxiety, which in turn are associated with increased risk of perinatal complications, postpartum depression as well as behavioral problems in children. Aim: to assess the prevalence of symptoms related t...
Saved in:
Published in | Акушерство, гинекология и репродукция Vol. 17; no. 6; pp. 740 - 750 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English Russian |
Published |
IRBIS LLC
04.01.2024
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 2313-7347 2500-3194 |
DOI | 10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2023.462 |
Cover
Abstract | Introduction.
During pregnancy, a woman becomes vulnerable to develop symptoms of depression and anxiety, which in turn are associated with increased risk of perinatal complications, postpartum depression as well as behavioral problems in children.
Aim:
to assess the prevalence of symptoms related to depression and anxiety in pregnant women with threatened abortion (ТА), non-developing pregnancy (NP) as well as those with physiological course of pregnancy (РР) in the first trimester of pregnancy; to reveal major predictors of psycho-emotional disorders in pregnant women.
Materials and Methods
. Three groups of pregnant women were stratified: 62 patients with TA, 60 patients with NP and 57 women with PP. Clinical history and physical examination were performed in all subjects. All pregnant women were assessed by Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale and the Beck Depression Inventory.
Results.
It was found that the mean Beck’s score was significantly higher in NP vs. TA and PP groups (p < 0.05). Moreover, significant differences were also observed while comparing TA and PP groups (p = 0.037). Clinically important depression was found in 3.3 % NP women and in 1.6 % TA women. Preclinical depression was found in 13 % and 6.5 % women with NP and TA, respectively. The mean Hamilton scale score was significantly higher in NP vs. PP group (p < 0.05), but was comparable with that in TA group (p > 0.05). The mean score on the anxiety scale was significantly higher in TA vs. PP group (p = 0.001). Clinically significant mild to moderate anxiety was found in 4.9 % and 1.6 % TA and NP women, respectively. Mild anxiety symptoms were noted in 35.5 % of women with TA, 38.3 % of women with NP, and 15.7 % of women with PP. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that a burdened obstetric history and the duration of the patient hospital stay had the strongest association with symptoms of depression and anxiety.
Conclusion.
Symptoms of prenatal anxiety and depression are widespread and should be identified in a timely manner. Psychological counseling and testing of pregnant women should be included into recommendations for pregnancy management. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Introduction. During pregnancy, a woman becomes vulnerable to develop symptoms of depression and anxiety, which in turn are associated with increased risk of perinatal complications, postpartum depression as well as behavioral problems in children.Aim: to assess the prevalence of symptoms related to depression and anxiety in pregnant women with threatened abortion (ТА), non-developing pregnancy (NP) as well as those with physiological course of pregnancy (РР) in the first trimester of pregnancy; to reveal major predictors of psycho-emotional disorders in pregnant women.Materials and Methods. Three groups of pregnant women were stratified: 62 patients with TA, 60 patients with NP and 57 women with PP. Clinical history and physical examination were performed in all subjects. All pregnant women were assessed by Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale and the Beck Depression Inventory.Results. It was found that the mean Beck’s score was significantly higher in NP vs. TA and PP groups (p < 0.05). Moreover, significant differences were also observed while comparing TA and PP groups (p = 0.037). Clinically important depression was found in 3.3 % NP women and in 1.6 % TA women. Preclinical depression was found in 13 % and 6.5 % women with NP and TA, respectively. The mean Hamilton scale score was significantly higher in NP vs. PP group (p < 0.05), but was comparable with that in TA group (p > 0.05). The mean score on the anxiety scale was significantly higher in TA vs. PP group (p = 0.001). Clinically significant mild to moderate anxiety was found in 4.9 % and 1.6 % TA and NP women, respectively. Mild anxiety symptoms were noted in 35.5 % of women with TA, 38.3 % of women with NP, and 15.7 % of women with PP. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that a burdened obstetric history and the duration of the patient hospital stay had the strongest association with symptoms of depression and anxiety.Conclusion. Symptoms of prenatal anxiety and depression are widespread and should be identified in a timely manner. Psychological counseling and testing of pregnant women should be included into recommendations for pregnancy management. Introduction. During pregnancy, a woman becomes vulnerable to develop symptoms of depression and anxiety, which in turn are associated with increased risk of perinatal complications, postpartum depression as well as behavioral problems in children. Aim: to assess the prevalence of symptoms related to depression and anxiety in pregnant women with threatened abortion (ТА), non-developing pregnancy (NP) as well as those with physiological course of pregnancy (РР) in the first trimester of pregnancy; to reveal major predictors of psycho-emotional disorders in pregnant women. Materials and Methods . Three groups of pregnant women were stratified: 62 patients with TA, 60 patients with NP and 57 women with PP. Clinical history and physical examination were performed in all subjects. All pregnant women were assessed by Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale and the Beck Depression Inventory. Results. It was found that the mean Beck’s score was significantly higher in NP vs. TA and PP groups (p < 0.05). Moreover, significant differences were also observed while comparing TA and PP groups (p = 0.037). Clinically important depression was found in 3.3 % NP women and in 1.6 % TA women. Preclinical depression was found in 13 % and 6.5 % women with NP and TA, respectively. The mean Hamilton scale score was significantly higher in NP vs. PP group (p < 0.05), but was comparable with that in TA group (p > 0.05). The mean score on the anxiety scale was significantly higher in TA vs. PP group (p = 0.001). Clinically significant mild to moderate anxiety was found in 4.9 % and 1.6 % TA and NP women, respectively. Mild anxiety symptoms were noted in 35.5 % of women with TA, 38.3 % of women with NP, and 15.7 % of women with PP. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that a burdened obstetric history and the duration of the patient hospital stay had the strongest association with symptoms of depression and anxiety. Conclusion. Symptoms of prenatal anxiety and depression are widespread and should be identified in a timely manner. Psychological counseling and testing of pregnant women should be included into recommendations for pregnancy management. |
Author | Lomovitskaya, M. V. Salov, I. A. Naumova, I. V. Parshin, A. V. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: I. A. orcidid: 0000-0002-0729-9995 surname: Salov fullname: Salov, I. A. organization: Razumovsky Saratov State Medical University, Health Ministry of Russian Federation – sequence: 2 givenname: I. V. orcidid: 0000-0002-4220-1236 surname: Naumova fullname: Naumova, I. V. organization: Razumovsky Saratov State Medical University, Health Ministry of Russian Federation – sequence: 3 givenname: A. V. orcidid: 0000-0001-8793-4786 surname: Parshin fullname: Parshin, A. V. organization: Razumovsky Saratov State Medical University, Health Ministry of Russian Federation – sequence: 4 givenname: M. V. orcidid: 0009-0003-4036-6162 surname: Lomovitskaya fullname: Lomovitskaya, M. V. organization: Razumovsky Saratov State Medical University, Health Ministry of Russian Federation |
BookMark | eNo90E1rwzAMBmAzOljX9T_ktFtS23Kc-DIYZR-FwXbYzsZx5DQljYudUfrvl7TbThKSeBHPLZn1vkdC7hnNWFEIteLAIC1AFCtfZc2pzwIeMk45ZELyKzLnOaUpMCVmY_93e0OWMe4opVyxcZXPSfYRT3brO9-01nRJHMzwHRPvkqPfY58c22Gb7NtoTQitafCOXDvTRVz-1gX5en76XL-mb-8vm_XjW2rH73haWgBXCECOYK10zDhJHagaRZXXihVWVpYzqRSAUE4is0whLyWjkpaCwYJsLrm1Nzt9CO3ehJP2ptXngQ-NNmFobYdaIs8VBVdaWQunlCmxAmaxzl1V1W7Kerhk2eBjDOj-8xjVZ0w9AekJSPtKj5h6xNQTph4x4Qd6UWzD |
Cites_doi | 10.1037/t00742-000 10.1016/S0165-0327(02)00432-9 10.1016/j.jad.2016.11.031 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1959.tb00467.x 10.1080/14767058.2022.2049748 10.1186/s12889-020-8293-9 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00682-6 10.3949/ccjm.87a.19054 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.04.008 10.1016/j.clp.2011.06.007 10.1016/bs.irn.2019.11.002 10.1097/01.AOG.0000287065.59491.70 10.1016/j.jad.2018.04.012 10.1037/a0013242 10.1080/14767050701209560 10.3122/jabfm.2007.01.060058 10.1007/s00737-011-0249-8 10.1093/aje/kwf176 10.1080/01674820400024406 10.1186/s12884-021-04021-y 10.1016/j.jad.2020.07.046 10.1192/bjp.bp.116.187179 10.5498/wjp.v11.i7.325 10.1590/S1807-59322010001100013 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION DOA |
DOI | 10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2023.462 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
EISSN | 2500-3194 |
EndPage | 750 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_6e25903f8c6d4f99a8eb31ced5fbbdf1 10_17749_2313_7347_ob_gyn_rep_2023_462 |
GroupedDBID | AAYXX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS CITATION GROUPED_DOAJ |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c1772-8c33f743e2e3cc6f1af60f39de4b5d917c6bc216993349f6e1c19e28610608413 |
IEDL.DBID | DOA |
ISSN | 2313-7347 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:30:57 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:01:48 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 6 |
Language | English Russian |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c1772-8c33f743e2e3cc6f1af60f39de4b5d917c6bc216993349f6e1c19e28610608413 |
ORCID | 0000-0001-8793-4786 0000-0002-4220-1236 0009-0003-4036-6162 0000-0002-0729-9995 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/6e25903f8c6d4f99a8eb31ced5fbbdf1 |
PageCount | 11 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6e25903f8c6d4f99a8eb31ced5fbbdf1 crossref_primary_10_17749_2313_7347_ob_gyn_rep_2023_462 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2024-01-04 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-01-04 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2024 text: 2024-01-04 day: 04 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationTitle | Акушерство, гинекология и репродукция |
PublicationYear | 2024 |
Publisher | IRBIS LLC |
Publisher_xml | – name: IRBIS LLC |
References | ref13 ref12 ref15 ref14 ref11 ref10 ref2 ref1 ref17 ref16 ref19 ref18 ref24 ref23 ref25 ref20 ref22 ref21 ref8 ref7 ref9 ref4 ref3 ref6 ref5 |
References_xml | – ident: ref17 doi: 10.1037/t00742-000 – ident: ref7 doi: 10.1016/S0165-0327(02)00432-9 – ident: ref20 doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.11.031 – ident: ref16 doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1959.tb00467.x – ident: ref25 doi: 10.1080/14767058.2022.2049748 – ident: ref6 doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8293-9 – ident: ref8 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00682-6 – ident: ref9 – ident: ref2 doi: 10.3949/ccjm.87a.19054 – ident: ref14 doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.04.008 – ident: ref12 doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2011.06.007 – ident: ref13 doi: 10.1016/bs.irn.2019.11.002 – ident: ref18 doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000287065.59491.70 – ident: ref10 doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.04.012 – ident: ref4 doi: 10.1037/a0013242 – ident: ref15 doi: 10.1080/14767050701209560 – ident: ref21 doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2007.01.060058 – ident: ref23 doi: 10.1007/s00737-011-0249-8 – ident: ref11 doi: 10.1093/aje/kwf176 – ident: ref19 doi: 10.1080/01674820400024406 – ident: ref1 doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04021-y – ident: ref3 doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.07.046 – ident: ref5 doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.116.187179 – ident: ref22 doi: 10.5498/wjp.v11.i7.325 – ident: ref24 doi: 10.1590/S1807-59322010001100013 |
SSID | ssj0002911945 |
Score | 2.2464817 |
Snippet | Introduction.
During pregnancy, a woman becomes vulnerable to develop symptoms of depression and anxiety, which in turn are associated with increased risk of... Introduction. During pregnancy, a woman becomes vulnerable to develop symptoms of depression and anxiety, which in turn are associated with increased risk of... |
SourceID | doaj crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Index Database |
StartPage | 740 |
SubjectTerms | anxiety beck depression inventory depression hamilton anxiety rating scale pregnancy |
Title | Psychological status of women with miscarriage |
URI | https://doaj.org/article/6e25903f8c6d4f99a8eb31ced5fbbdf1 |
Volume | 17 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 2500-3194 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0002911945 issn: 2313-7347 databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 20070101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV09T8MwELUQA2JBIECUL3lAbEkT27nEIyCqioGJSt2s2D53a1BoB_49Z6dU7cTCainR5Z1z956VvGPsoQoCK92WmfQBMoXCZy0RjUyDk61TFuqQ3D7fYTpTb_NqvjPqK34TNtgDD8CNAYmgFzI0DrwKWrcNyb_Soa-CtT4k4UNtbEdMxRos6B3WaUIx8ReZ1VLVR-wxVgiiO3q8XRx3Nl98L_Meo3elkLkCsdehdoz8U8eZnLKTDVXkT0OIZ-ygX5-zfK9i8fg_0PqLd4EnKwUej1U5pc61Pe2sBV6w2eT142WabWYeZI5Co-LkpAzU1VGgdA5C2QYogtQela08aSsH1okSiFZIpQNg6UqNoiEWBEVDHemSHS67JV4xLopAmhOjoQ-oRlGFJYpaS60sWpAKRqz-fU7zOVhbmCgJIkImImQiQqazhhAyhJCJCBlCaMSeIyzbq6JFdVqgxJlN4sxfibv-j5vcsGMKSqUzEXXLDlf9Gu-IJazsfdoQP2kRt-8 |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Psychological+status+of+women+with+miscarriage&rft.jtitle=%D0%90%D0%BA%D1%83%D1%88%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%BE%2C+%D0%B3%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%B8%D1%8F+%D0%B8+%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B4%D1%83%D0%BA%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F&rft.au=I.+A.+Salov&rft.au=I.+V.+Naumova&rft.au=A.+V.+Parshin&rft.au=M.+V.+Lomovitskaya&rft.date=2024-01-04&rft.pub=IRBIS+LLC&rft.issn=2313-7347&rft.eissn=2500-3194&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=740&rft.epage=750&rft_id=info:doi/10.17749%2F2313-7347%2Fob.gyn.rep.2023.462&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_6e25903f8c6d4f99a8eb31ced5fbbdf1 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2313-7347&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2313-7347&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2313-7347&client=summon |