Raw Anode Volume Density Prediction Algorithm Based on the Genetic Algorithm

In the process of aluminum electrolytic anode production, raw anode volume density is an important indicator of anode quality, which is of great significance to ensure the quality of raw anode volume density through raw anode production control parameters and the ratio of raw material. Considering t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSN computer science Vol. 3; no. 5; p. 354
Main Authors Cao, Danyang, Tian, Xuefa
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Singapore Springer Nature Singapore 30.06.2022
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2661-8907
2662-995X
2661-8907
DOI10.1007/s42979-022-01248-0

Cover

More Information
Summary:In the process of aluminum electrolytic anode production, raw anode volume density is an important indicator of anode quality, which is of great significance to ensure the quality of raw anode volume density through raw anode production control parameters and the ratio of raw material. Considering the nonlinear characteristics of the raw anode production process and combining the advantages of the neural network in the nonlinear prediction problem, deep neural networks are used to model the raw anode volume density. For the uncertainty of neural network model structure, a competitive evolutionary adaptive genetic algorithm is proposed to determine the network model structure. The algorithm selects well-performing individuals through competitive fitness values to form progeny populations. During the process of genetic variation, the variation probability is adaptive calculated from the fitness values of the parent and the current number of population iterations to converge the optimal results. Experimental results show that in terms of production data, the optimization ability of the neural network model structure is significantly improved compared with other algorithms, with the root mean square error of the prediction value of the raw anode volume density is 0.005, which is smaller error than other methods.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:2661-8907
2662-995X
2661-8907
DOI:10.1007/s42979-022-01248-0