Usability testing of an online, evidence-based pharmacogenomics education program for pharmacists working in cancer care
Usability testing provides valuable information when ensuring newly developed education programs are deemed acceptable to the target audience. The aim is to evaluate the usability of an online, evidence-based pharmacogenomics education program, developed in-house, to subsequently improve the user ex...
Saved in:
| Published in | Currents in pharmacy teaching and learning Vol. 17; no. 12; p. 102478 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01.12.2025
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 1877-1297 1877-1300 1877-1300 |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478 |
Cover
| Abstract | Usability testing provides valuable information when ensuring newly developed education programs are deemed acceptable to the target audience. The aim is to evaluate the usability of an online, evidence-based pharmacogenomics education program, developed in-house, to subsequently improve the user experience before wide scale implementation to pharmacists at an Australian public oncology hospital.
The methodology was adapted from Benedict et al. (2022) with permission. Five pharmacist-users tested up to two of eight modules utilising the think-aloud method. Participants' video, audio and screens were recorded, with automated audio transcription. A facilitator was present to prompt verbalisation of thoughts, ask standard pre- and post-usability testing questions, and guide users to complete three quantitative instruments; System Usability Scale (SUS), Standardised User Experience Percentile Rank Question (SUPR-Q) and WebQual. Two researchers employed reflexive thematic analysis.
Four themes were finalised based on generated codes; recognition of usefulness of content, factors inhibiting understanding, acceptable user experience and poor user experience. The mean SUS and SUPR-Q scores were 83.1 (SD 14.9) and 4.6 (SD 0.2) respectively, and the overall mean WebQual score was 6.1 (SD 0.2), all indicating good usability. Overall, pharmacists valued the program content and found the format visually satisfying and engaging.
The education program was found to be acceptable, useful, and a positive learning experience for pharmacists prior to practicing in pharmacogenomics. Results were used to inform changes to the program to further enhance the user experience.
Process, outcome and implementation evaluation will be conducted after program rollout.
•Usability testing is valuable and necessary for newly developed education programs.•Qualitative and quantitative results informed changes to enhance user experience.•Our pharmacogenomics education program successfully demonstrated usefulness. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Usability testing provides valuable information when ensuring newly developed education programs are deemed acceptable to the target audience. The aim is to evaluate the usability of an online, evidence-based pharmacogenomics education program, developed in-house, to subsequently improve the user experience before wide scale implementation to pharmacists at an Australian public oncology hospital.
The methodology was adapted from Benedict et al. (2022) with permission. Five pharmacist-users tested up to two of eight modules utilising the think-aloud method. Participants' video, audio and screens were recorded, with automated audio transcription. A facilitator was present to prompt verbalisation of thoughts, ask standard pre- and post-usability testing questions, and guide users to complete three quantitative instruments; System Usability Scale (SUS), Standardised User Experience Percentile Rank Question (SUPR-Q) and WebQual. Two researchers employed reflexive thematic analysis.
Four themes were finalised based on generated codes; recognition of usefulness of content, factors inhibiting understanding, acceptable user experience and poor user experience. The mean SUS and SUPR-Q scores were 83.1 (SD 14.9) and 4.6 (SD 0.2) respectively, and the overall mean WebQual score was 6.1 (SD 0.2), all indicating good usability. Overall, pharmacists valued the program content and found the format visually satisfying and engaging.
The education program was found to be acceptable, useful, and a positive learning experience for pharmacists prior to practicing in pharmacogenomics. Results were used to inform changes to the program to further enhance the user experience.
Process, outcome and implementation evaluation will be conducted after program rollout. Usability testing provides valuable information when ensuring newly developed education programs are deemed acceptable to the target audience. The aim is to evaluate the usability of an online, evidence-based pharmacogenomics education program, developed in-house, to subsequently improve the user experience before wide scale implementation to pharmacists at an Australian public oncology hospital. The methodology was adapted from Benedict et al. (2022) with permission. Five pharmacist-users tested up to two of eight modules utilising the think-aloud method. Participants' video, audio and screens were recorded, with automated audio transcription. A facilitator was present to prompt verbalisation of thoughts, ask standard pre- and post-usability testing questions, and guide users to complete three quantitative instruments; System Usability Scale (SUS), Standardised User Experience Percentile Rank Question (SUPR-Q) and WebQual. Two researchers employed reflexive thematic analysis. Four themes were finalised based on generated codes; recognition of usefulness of content, factors inhibiting understanding, acceptable user experience and poor user experience. The mean SUS and SUPR-Q scores were 83.1 (SD 14.9) and 4.6 (SD 0.2) respectively, and the overall mean WebQual score was 6.1 (SD 0.2), all indicating good usability. Overall, pharmacists valued the program content and found the format visually satisfying and engaging. The education program was found to be acceptable, useful, and a positive learning experience for pharmacists prior to practicing in pharmacogenomics. Results were used to inform changes to the program to further enhance the user experience. Process, outcome and implementation evaluation will be conducted after program rollout. •Usability testing is valuable and necessary for newly developed education programs.•Qualitative and quantitative results informed changes to enhance user experience.•Our pharmacogenomics education program successfully demonstrated usefulness. Usability testing provides valuable information when ensuring newly developed education programs are deemed acceptable to the target audience. The aim is to evaluate the usability of an online, evidence-based pharmacogenomics education program, developed in-house, to subsequently improve the user experience before wide scale implementation to pharmacists at an Australian public oncology hospital.INTRODUCTIONUsability testing provides valuable information when ensuring newly developed education programs are deemed acceptable to the target audience. The aim is to evaluate the usability of an online, evidence-based pharmacogenomics education program, developed in-house, to subsequently improve the user experience before wide scale implementation to pharmacists at an Australian public oncology hospital.The methodology was adapted from Benedict et al. (2022) with permission. Five pharmacist-users tested up to two of eight modules utilising the think-aloud method. Participants' video, audio and screens were recorded, with automated audio transcription. A facilitator was present to prompt verbalisation of thoughts, ask standard pre- and post-usability testing questions, and guide users to complete three quantitative instruments; System Usability Scale (SUS), Standardised User Experience Percentile Rank Question (SUPR-Q) and WebQual. Two researchers employed reflexive thematic analysis.METHODSThe methodology was adapted from Benedict et al. (2022) with permission. Five pharmacist-users tested up to two of eight modules utilising the think-aloud method. Participants' video, audio and screens were recorded, with automated audio transcription. A facilitator was present to prompt verbalisation of thoughts, ask standard pre- and post-usability testing questions, and guide users to complete three quantitative instruments; System Usability Scale (SUS), Standardised User Experience Percentile Rank Question (SUPR-Q) and WebQual. Two researchers employed reflexive thematic analysis.Four themes were finalised based on generated codes; recognition of usefulness of content, factors inhibiting understanding, acceptable user experience and poor user experience. The mean SUS and SUPR-Q scores were 83.1 (SD 14.9) and 4.6 (SD 0.2) respectively, and the overall mean WebQual score was 6.1 (SD 0.2), all indicating good usability. Overall, pharmacists valued the program content and found the format visually satisfying and engaging.RESULTSFour themes were finalised based on generated codes; recognition of usefulness of content, factors inhibiting understanding, acceptable user experience and poor user experience. The mean SUS and SUPR-Q scores were 83.1 (SD 14.9) and 4.6 (SD 0.2) respectively, and the overall mean WebQual score was 6.1 (SD 0.2), all indicating good usability. Overall, pharmacists valued the program content and found the format visually satisfying and engaging.The education program was found to be acceptable, useful, and a positive learning experience for pharmacists prior to practicing in pharmacogenomics. Results were used to inform changes to the program to further enhance the user experience.DISCUSSIONThe education program was found to be acceptable, useful, and a positive learning experience for pharmacists prior to practicing in pharmacogenomics. Results were used to inform changes to the program to further enhance the user experience.Process, outcome and implementation evaluation will be conducted after program rollout.CONCLUSIONProcess, outcome and implementation evaluation will be conducted after program rollout. |
| ArticleNumber | 102478 |
| Author | Lingaratnam, Senthil Devine, Jenny Hussainy, Safeera Y. Lim, Chiao X. Bridges, Georgia Lee, Benjamin |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Benjamin surname: Lee fullname: Lee, Benjamin organization: Pharmacy Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia – sequence: 2 givenname: Georgia surname: Bridges fullname: Bridges, Georgia organization: Pharmacy Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia – sequence: 3 givenname: Chiao X. surname: Lim fullname: Lim, Chiao X. organization: Pharmacy, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, PO Box 71, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia – sequence: 4 givenname: Jenny surname: Devine fullname: Devine, Jenny organization: Consumer Member, Consumer Register, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia – sequence: 5 givenname: Senthil surname: Lingaratnam fullname: Lingaratnam, Senthil organization: Pharmacy Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia – sequence: 6 givenname: Safeera Y. surname: Hussainy fullname: Hussainy, Safeera Y. email: safeera.hussainy@unimelb.edu.au organization: Pharmacy Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40939534$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNp9kU1P3DAQhq2Kqny0f4AD8pFDs_VHHDsSF4RKWwmpl3K2HHu89ZLYi52F8u9xtCzHnmY0et5XM_OeoqOYIiB0TsmKEtp926zsdh5XjDBRB6yV6gM6oUrKhnJCjg496-UxOi1lQ4gkpOOf0HFLet4L3p6gf_fFDGEM8wueocwhrnHy2ESc4hgifMXwFBxEC81gCji8_WvyZGxaQ0xTsAWD21kzhxTxNqd1NhP2KR-wUOaCn1N-WHxDxNZUp1xLhs_oozdjgS9v9Qzd337_c_Ozufv949fN9V1jqWBt45SEHvwgmVJtr4RrGafetYPvhJRMGLCtp9z1veo8yKHvlHJCKfCWKyssP0OXe9-63uOunqinUCyMo4mQdkVzJgilHRG0ohdv6G6YwOltDpPJL_rwrQqwPWBzKiWDf0co0UskeqOXSPQSid5HUkVXexHUK58CZF1sWD7qQgY7a5fC_-SvM2iVyg |
| Cites_doi | 10.1038/clpt.2010.279 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa 10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y 10.1080/01449290500330448 10.1016/j.cptl.2023.12.010 10.2753/JEC1086-4415110302 10.1111/cts.13672 10.1016/j.cptl.2020.09.005 10.2196/21270 10.1111/cts.70083 10.1016/j.tipsro.2022.09.001 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.02.009 10.1002/cpt.1049 10.1111/cts.13664 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010 10.2196/33304 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2025 Copyright © 2025. Published by Elsevier Inc. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2025 – notice: Copyright © 2025. Published by Elsevier Inc. |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Education Pharmacy, Therapeutics, & Pharmacology |
| EISSN | 1877-1300 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 40939534 10_1016_j_cptl_2025_102478 S1877129725001996 |
| Genre | Journal Article |
| GroupedDBID | --- --K --M .~1 0R~ 1B1 1~. 4.4 457 4G. 5VS 7-5 71M 8P~ AAEDT AAEDW AAFJI AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AATTM AAXKI AAXUO AAYWO ABFNM ABJNI ABMAC ABWVN ABXDB ABZDS ACDAQ ACGFO ACGFS ACRLP ACRPL ACVFH ADBBV ADCNI ADEZE ADMUD ADNMO AEBSH AEIPS AEKER AEUPX AFJKZ AFPUW AFTJW AFXIZ AGCQF AGHFR AGUBO AGYEJ AIEXJ AIGII AIIUN AIKHN AITUG AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ALCLG ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ANKPU AOMHK APXCP AVARZ AXJTR BKOJK BLXMC EBS EFJIC EFKBS EFLBG EJD EP3 FDB FEDTE FIRID FNPLU FYGXN GBLVA HVGLF HZ~ J1W KOM M41 MO0 N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OGGZJ OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. PRBVW Q38 ROL SDF SEL SES SPCBC SSB SSO SSP SSZ T5K ~G- ~HD AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c1524-d87e9efb72884985d4231fd4bf657725aec4f13d9986fe7b9688d588efc38c5c3 |
| IEDL.DBID | AIKHN |
| ISSN | 1877-1297 1877-1300 |
| IngestDate | Sat Sep 13 16:50:41 EDT 2025 Sun Sep 14 01:40:37 EDT 2025 Thu Sep 18 00:14:06 EDT 2025 Sat Sep 20 17:14:33 EDT 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 12 |
| Keywords | Education Pharmacy Oncology Thematic Usability Testing Pharmacogenomics |
| Language | English |
| License | Copyright © 2025. Published by Elsevier Inc. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c1524-d87e9efb72884985d4231fd4bf657725aec4f13d9986fe7b9688d588efc38c5c3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| PMID | 40939534 |
| PQID | 3250116051 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_3250116051 pubmed_primary_40939534 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cptl_2025_102478 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_cptl_2025_102478 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | December 2025 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2025-12-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2025 text: December 2025 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
| PublicationTitle | Currents in pharmacy teaching and learning |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Curr Pharm Teach Learn |
| PublicationYear | 2025 |
| Publisher | Elsevier Inc |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Inc |
| References | Wolcott, Lobczowski (bb0060) 2021; 13 Loiacono, Watson, Goodhue (bb0095) 2007; 11 Lindgaard G, Fernandes G, Dudek C, Brown J. Attention web designers: you have 50 milliseconds to make a good first impression! Behav Inform Technol 2006 2006;25(2):115–126. doi Glewis, Krishnasamy, Lingaratnam (bb0015) 2023; 16 Bligh (bb0125) 1972 Swen, Nijenhuis, van Rhenen (bb0010) 2018; 103 Lim, Bozkurt, Chen (bb0020) 2023; 16 Sauro (bb0110) 2010 Harris, Taylor, Thielke, Payne, Gonzalez, Conde (bb0070) 2009; 42 Hussainy, Lee, Lim (bb0030) 2024 Wolcott, McLaughlin (bb0120) 2024; 16 Hertzum (bb0065) 2020 Benedict, Dauber-Decker, Ford (bb0035) 2022; 8 Sauro (bb0105) 2018 Keenan, Duke, Wharrad, Doody, Patel (bb0050) 2022; 2022-12 Dauber-Decker, Basile, King (bb0040) 2021; 8 Alajarmeh (bb0135) 2022; 21 Relling, Klein (bb0005) 2011; 89 Alhadreti, Mayhew (bb0055) 2016 Li, Kannry, Kushniruk (bb0045) 2012; 81 Sauro (bb0085) 2011 Turner, Lewis, Nielsen (bb0115) 2006 . W3C Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1. Accessed 2024-12-17. https Baldino (bb0090) 2020 Glewis, Lingaratnam, Lee (bb0025) 2024; 17 Byrne (bb0075) 2022; 56 Braun, Clarke (bb0080) 2006; 3 Glewis (10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0015) 2023; 16 10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0130 Alhadreti (10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0055) 2016 Sauro (10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0105) Wolcott (10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0120) 2024; 16 Relling (10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0005) 2011; 89 Li (10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0045) 2012; 81 Wolcott (10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0060) 2021; 13 Benedict (10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0035) 2022; 8 Byrne (10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0075) 2022; 56 Braun (10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0080) 2006; 3 Baldino (10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0090) 2020 Sauro (10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0085) Swen (10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0010) 2018; 103 Sauro (10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0110) Glewis (10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0025) 2024; 17 Keenan (10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0050) 2022; 2022-12 Bligh (10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0125) 1972 Hussainy (10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0030) 2024 10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0100 Dauber-Decker (10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0040) 2021; 8 Hertzum (10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0065) 2020 Loiacono (10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0095) 2007; 11 Turner (10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0115) 2006 Lim (10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0020) 2023; 16 Alajarmeh (10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0135) 2022; 21 Harris (10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0070) 2009; 42 |
| References_xml | – year: 2016 ident: bb0055 article-title: “Thinking about Thinking Aloud”: An Investigation of Think-Aloud Methods in Usability Testing – volume: 11 start-page: 51 year: 2007 end-page: 87 ident: bb0095 article-title: WebQual: an instrument for consumer evaluation of web sites publication-title: Int J Electron Commer – reference: Lindgaard G, Fernandes G, Dudek C, Brown J. Attention web designers: you have 50 milliseconds to make a good first impression! Behav Inform Technol 2006 2006;25(2):115–126. doi: – year: 2011 ident: bb0085 article-title: Measuring Usability with the System Usability Scale (SUS) – MeasuringU – start-page: 256 year: 1972 ident: bb0125 article-title: What’s the Use of Lectures? – volume: 56 start-page: 1391 year: 2022 end-page: 1412 ident: bb0075 article-title: A worked example of Braun and Clarke's approach to reflexive thematic analysis publication-title: Qual Quant – year: 2010 ident: bb0110 article-title: A Practical Guide to Measuring Usability 72 Answers to the Most Common Questions About Quantifying the Usability of Websites and Softwares – volume: 16 start-page: 144 year: 2024 end-page: 149 ident: bb0120 article-title: Exploring user experience (UX) research methods in health professions education publication-title: Curr Pharm Teach Learn – volume: 103 start-page: 795 year: 2018 end-page: 801 ident: bb0010 article-title: Pharmacogenetic information in clinical guidelines: the European perspective publication-title: Clin Pharmacol Ther – volume: 17 year: 2024 ident: bb0025 article-title: Pharmacogenetic-guided dosing for fluoropyrimidine ( publication-title: Clin Transl Sci – volume: 81 start-page: 761 year: 2012 end-page: 772 ident: bb0045 article-title: Integrating usability testing and think-aloud protocol analysis with “near-live” clinical simulations in evaluating clinical decision support publication-title: Int J Med Inform – volume: 3 start-page: 77 year: 2006 end-page: 101 ident: bb0080 article-title: Using thematic analysis in psychology publication-title: Qual Res Psychol – year: 2018 ident: bb0105 article-title: 5 Ways to Interpret a SUS Score – MeasuringU – volume: 8 year: 2021 ident: bb0040 article-title: Developing a decision aid to facilitate informed decision making about invasive mechanical ventilation and lung transplantation among adults with cystic fibrosis: usability testing publication-title: JMIR Human Factors – volume: 8 year: 2022 ident: bb0035 article-title: Development of a web-based decision aid and planning tool for family building after cancer (roadmap to parenthood): usability testing publication-title: JMIR Cancer – volume: 2022-12 start-page: 67 year: 2022 end-page: 72 ident: bb0050 article-title: Usability: an introduction to and literature review of usability testing for educational resources in radiation oncology publication-title: Techn Innov Patient Supp Radiat Oncol – year: 2020 ident: bb0065 article-title: Usability Testing: A Practitioner's Guide to Evaluating the User Experience. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics – volume: 13 start-page: 181 year: 2021 end-page: 188 ident: bb0060 article-title: Using cognitive interviews and think-aloud protocols to understand thought processes publication-title: Curr Pharm Teach Learn – reference: . – year: 2020 ident: bb0090 article-title: Using the SUPR-Q as a design metric publication-title: Fuzzy Math blog – volume: 21 start-page: 771 year: 2022 end-page: 789 ident: bb0135 article-title: Evaluating the Accessibility of Public Health Websites: An Exploratory Cross-Country Study. Universal Access in the Information Society – start-page: 3076 year: 2006 end-page: 3080 ident: bb0115 article-title: Determining usability test sample size publication-title: Int Encyclop Ergon Hum Fact – volume: 16 start-page: 2700 year: 2023 end-page: 2708 ident: bb0015 article-title: Patient and healthcare professional acceptability of pharmacogenetic screening for publication-title: Clin Transl Sci – volume: 89 start-page: 464 year: 2011 end-page: 467 ident: bb0005 article-title: CPIC: clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium of the pharmacogenomics research network publication-title: Clin Pharmacol Ther – volume: 16 start-page: 2467 year: 2023 end-page: 2482 ident: bb0020 article-title: Healthcare professionals’ and consumers’ knowledge, attitudes, perspectives, and education needs in oncology pharmacogenomics: a systematic review publication-title: Clin Transl Sci – year: 2024 ident: bb0030 article-title: Development of an Evidence-Based Pharmacogenomics Education and Implementation Program for Pharmacists Working in Cancer Care [Poster Presentation] – volume: 42 start-page: 377 year: 2009 end-page: 381 ident: bb0070 article-title: Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support publication-title: J Biomed Inform – reference: W3C Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1. Accessed 2024-12-17. https:// – volume: 89 start-page: 464 issue: 3 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0005 article-title: CPIC: clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium of the pharmacogenomics research network publication-title: Clin Pharmacol Ther doi: 10.1038/clpt.2010.279 – volume: 3 start-page: 77 issue: 2 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0080 article-title: Using thematic analysis in psychology publication-title: Qual Res Psychol doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa – volume: 56 start-page: 1391 issue: 3 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0075 article-title: A worked example of Braun and Clarke's approach to reflexive thematic analysis publication-title: Qual Quant doi: 10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y – ident: 10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0100 doi: 10.1080/01449290500330448 – year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0090 article-title: Using the SUPR-Q as a design metric publication-title: Fuzzy Math blog – year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0055 – volume: 16 start-page: 144 issue: 2 year: 2024 ident: 10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0120 article-title: Exploring user experience (UX) research methods in health professions education publication-title: Curr Pharm Teach Learn doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2023.12.010 – volume: 11 start-page: 51 issue: 3 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0095 article-title: WebQual: an instrument for consumer evaluation of web sites publication-title: Int J Electron Commer doi: 10.2753/JEC1086-4415110302 – volume: 16 start-page: 2467 issue: 12 year: 2023 ident: 10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0020 article-title: Healthcare professionals’ and consumers’ knowledge, attitudes, perspectives, and education needs in oncology pharmacogenomics: a systematic review publication-title: Clin Transl Sci doi: 10.1111/cts.13672 – volume: 13 start-page: 181 issue: 2 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0060 article-title: Using cognitive interviews and think-aloud protocols to understand thought processes publication-title: Curr Pharm Teach Learn doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2020.09.005 – start-page: 3076 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0115 article-title: Determining usability test sample size publication-title: Int Encyclop Ergon Hum Fact – volume: 8 issue: 2 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0040 article-title: Developing a decision aid to facilitate informed decision making about invasive mechanical ventilation and lung transplantation among adults with cystic fibrosis: usability testing publication-title: JMIR Human Factors doi: 10.2196/21270 – year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0065 – volume: 17 issue: 12 year: 2024 ident: 10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0025 article-title: Pharmacogenetic-guided dosing for fluoropyrimidine (DPYD) and irinotecan (UGT1A1*28) chemotherapies for patients with cancer (PACIFIC - PGx): a multicenter clinical trial publication-title: Clin Transl Sci doi: 10.1111/cts.70083 – volume: 2022-12 start-page: 67 issue: 24 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0050 article-title: Usability: an introduction to and literature review of usability testing for educational resources in radiation oncology publication-title: Techn Innov Patient Supp Radiat Oncol doi: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2022.09.001 – ident: 10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0110 – volume: 81 start-page: 761 issue: 11 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0045 article-title: Integrating usability testing and think-aloud protocol analysis with “near-live” clinical simulations in evaluating clinical decision support publication-title: Int J Med Inform doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.02.009 – volume: 103 start-page: 795 issue: 5 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0010 article-title: Pharmacogenetic information in clinical guidelines: the European perspective publication-title: Clin Pharmacol Ther doi: 10.1002/cpt.1049 – volume: 16 start-page: 2700 issue: 12 year: 2023 ident: 10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0015 article-title: Patient and healthcare professional acceptability of pharmacogenetic screening for DPYD and UGT1A1: a cross sectional survey publication-title: Clin Transl Sci doi: 10.1111/cts.13664 – volume: 42 start-page: 377 issue: 2 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0070 article-title: Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support publication-title: J Biomed Inform doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010 – ident: 10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0085 – ident: 10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0105 – ident: 10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0130 – volume: 21 start-page: 771 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0135 – year: 2024 ident: 10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0030 – volume: 8 issue: 2 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0035 article-title: Development of a web-based decision aid and planning tool for family building after cancer (roadmap to parenthood): usability testing publication-title: JMIR Cancer doi: 10.2196/33304 – start-page: 256 year: 1972 ident: 10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478_bb0125 |
| SSID | ssj0070063 |
| Score | 2.3301091 |
| Snippet | Usability testing provides valuable information when ensuring newly developed education programs are deemed acceptable to the target audience. The aim is to... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref elsevier |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
| StartPage | 102478 |
| SubjectTerms | Education Oncology Pharmacogenomics Pharmacy Testing Thematic Usability |
| Title | Usability testing of an online, evidence-based pharmacogenomics education program for pharmacists working in cancer care |
| URI | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102478 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40939534 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3250116051 |
| Volume | 17 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwEB612wsXRMtr6UNGQr2wZuPYTpxjVVEtrKgq6IrerMSPapHIrrqpyl747fWsHSok4MApSmQnlmfi-Wx__gbgDfciD5gtoz5gVSq8MbQ2uaVZVnNnA56Qm_WOT-fFZCY-XsmrLTjtz8IgrTKN_XFM34zW6ck49eZ4OZ-PvzBVliFalSGIZ8il3YadnFeFHMDOyYfp5LwfkMuUUA3LU6yQzs5EmpdZdrgDkUsUMRCYbe3P8elv-HMTh86ewOMEIMlJbOMubLl2D3MvJ57GHhxfRDXq9YhcPhyuWo3IMbl40KleP4Ufsyiv261Jh1ob7TVZeFK3JKpnjIhLGUcphjpLlqk2yrp-D28krv8oSSwvEhBwXyy4z4rcxaV4Mm-JQfe6Icg0ewazs_eXpxOaEjFQE8K7oFaVrnK-KXOlRKWkDRiMeSsaX8iAzmXtjPCM2zB1K7wrm6pQykqlnDdcGWn4cxi0i9a9BMJqX5XMycYWRhhZNJlzCCmcz2ojVTOEt33362XU29A9Ee2bRmNpNJaOxhqC7C2kf_MaHQLCP-u97s2pw--EeyR16xa3K82DNzEW5nhsCC-inX-1I0yFeSW5ePWfX92HR3gXyTAHMOhubt1hgDRdcwTb736yo-S4eJ1-_jq9B9T4-KM |
| linkProvider | Elsevier |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Nb9QwELVKOcClgvK15WuQUC-s2WRtx84RVVQLtFUldqXerMSx0VZqdtVNBXvpb-_M2mmFBBy4JnZseSaeZ_v5DWPvRZBjxGwZD4hVuQzO8cqNG55llfAN4gm12e84PikmM_n1TJ1tsYP-LgzRKtPcH-f0zWydnozSaI6W8_noe260xmilMYhnxKW9x-5LJTTx-j5e3_I8dEqnRqU5FU83ZyLJyy07On8YK5IwkJRr7c_R6W_ocxOFDh-xnQQf4VPs4WO25dtdyrycWBq7bP80alGvhzC9u1q1GsI-nN6pVK-fsF-zKK7braEjpY32BywCVC1E7Ywh-JRvlFOga2CZapOo6wV-EXzfKCSOFyD-7Yuh86zgZ9yIh3kLjpzrEohn9pTNDj9PDyY8pWHgDoO75I3RvvSh1mNjZGlUgwgsD42sQ6EQm6vKOxly0eDCrQhe12VhTKOM8cEJ45QTz9h2u2j9CwZ5FUqde1U3hZNOFXXmPQEKH7LKKVMP2Id--O0yqm3YnoZ2bslYloxlo7EGTPUWsr_5jMVw8M9673pzWvyZ6ISkav3iamUF-lKe4wovH7Dn0c63_cCFsCiVkHv_2epb9mAyPT6yR19Ovr1kD-lNpMW8Ytvd5ZV_jeCmq99snPcGMRf3yw |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Usability+testing+of+an+online%2C+evidence-based+pharmacogenomics+education+program+for+pharmacists+working+in+cancer+care&rft.jtitle=Currents+in+pharmacy+teaching+and+learning&rft.au=Lee%2C+Benjamin&rft.au=Bridges%2C+Georgia&rft.au=Lim%2C+Chiao+X.&rft.au=Devine%2C+Jenny&rft.date=2025-12-01&rft.issn=1877-1297&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=102478&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.cptl.2025.102478&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1016_j_cptl_2025_102478 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1877-1297&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1877-1297&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1877-1297&client=summon |