Poster — Thur Eve — 26: Evaluation of lens dose from anterior electron beams: comparison of Pinnacle and Gafchromic EBT3 film

The purpose of this work is twofold: 1) to measure dose profiles under lead shielding at the level of the lens for a range of clinical electron energies via film dosimetry; and, 2) to assess the validity of the Pinnacle treatment planning system (TPS) in calculating the penumbral doses under lead sh...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMedical physics (Lancaster) Vol. 41; no. 8Part2; p. 12
Main Authors Sanier, M, Wronski, M, Yeboah, C
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Association of Physicists in Medicine 01.08.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0094-2405
2473-4209
DOI10.1118/1.4894883

Cover

Abstract The purpose of this work is twofold: 1) to measure dose profiles under lead shielding at the level of the lens for a range of clinical electron energies via film dosimetry; and, 2) to assess the validity of the Pinnacle treatment planning system (TPS) in calculating the penumbral doses under lead shielding with the heterogeneous electron algorithm. First, a film calibration curve that spanned the electron energies of interest, 6–18MeV, was created. Next, EBT3 film and lead shielding were incorporated into a solid water phantom with the film positioned 7mm below the lead and a variable thickness of bolus on top. This geometry was reproduced in the Pinnacle TPS and used to calculate dose profiles using the heterogeneous electron algorithm. The measured vs. calculated dose profiles were normalized to dmax in a homogeneous phantom with no lead shielding and compared. Pinnacle consistently overestimated the dose distal to the lead shielding with significant discrepancies occurring near the edge of the lead shield reaching 25% at the edge and 35% in the open field region. The film measurements showed that a minimum lead margin of 5mm extending beyond the diameter of the lens is required to adequately shield the lens to ≤10% of the dose at dmax. These measurements allow for a reasonable estimate of the dose to the lens from anterior electron beams. They also allow for clinicians to assess the extent of the lead margin required to reduce the lens dose to an acceptable amount prior to radiotherapy treatment.
AbstractList The purpose of this work is twofold: 1) to measure dose profiles under lead shielding at the level of the lens for a range of clinical electron energies via film dosimetry; and, 2) to assess the validity of the Pinnacle treatment planning system (TPS) in calculating the penumbral doses under lead shielding with the heterogeneous electron algorithm. First, a film calibration curve that spanned the electron energies of interest, 6–18MeV, was created. Next, EBT3 film and lead shielding were incorporated into a solid water phantom with the film positioned 7mm below the lead and a variable thickness of bolus on top. This geometry was reproduced in the Pinnacle TPS and used to calculate dose profiles using the heterogeneous electron algorithm. The measured vs. calculated dose profiles were normalized to d{sub max} in a homogeneous phantom with no lead shielding and compared. Pinnacle consistently overestimated the dose distal to the lead shielding with significant discrepancies occurring near the edge of the lead shield reaching 25% at the edge and 35% in the open field region. The film measurements showed that a minimum lead margin of 5mm extending beyond the diameter of the lens is required to adequately shield the lens to ≤10% of the dose at d{sub max}. These measurements allow for a reasonable estimate of the dose to the lens from anterior electron beams. They also allow for clinicians to assess the extent of the lead margin required to reduce the lens dose to an acceptable amount prior to radiotherapy treatment.
Abstract only The purpose of this work is twofold: 1) to measure dose profiles under lead shielding at the level of the lens for a range of clinical electron energies via film dosimetry; and, 2) to assess the validity of the Pinnacle treatment planning system (TPS) in calculating the penumbral doses under lead shielding with the heterogeneous electron algorithm. First, a film calibration curve that spanned the electron energies of interest, 6–18MeV, was created. Next, EBT3 film and lead shielding were incorporated into a solid water phantom with the film positioned 7mm below the lead and a variable thickness of bolus on top. This geometry was reproduced in the Pinnacle TPS and used to calculate dose profiles using the heterogeneous electron algorithm. The measured vs. calculated dose profiles were normalized to d max in a homogeneous phantom with no lead shielding and compared. Pinnacle consistently overestimated the dose distal to the lead shielding with significant discrepancies occurring near the edge of the lead shield reaching 25% at the edge and 35% in the open field region. The film measurements showed that a minimum lead margin of 5mm extending beyond the diameter of the lens is required to adequately shield the lens to ≤10% of the dose at d max . These measurements allow for a reasonable estimate of the dose to the lens from anterior electron beams. They also allow for clinicians to assess the extent of the lead margin required to reduce the lens dose to an acceptable amount prior to radiotherapy treatment.
The purpose of this work is twofold: 1) to measure dose profiles under lead shielding at the level of the lens for a range of clinical electron energies via film dosimetry; and, 2) to assess the validity of the Pinnacle treatment planning system (TPS) in calculating the penumbral doses under lead shielding with the heterogeneous electron algorithm. First, a film calibration curve that spanned the electron energies of interest, 6–18MeV, was created. Next, EBT3 film and lead shielding were incorporated into a solid water phantom with the film positioned 7mm below the lead and a variable thickness of bolus on top. This geometry was reproduced in the Pinnacle TPS and used to calculate dose profiles using the heterogeneous electron algorithm. The measured vs. calculated dose profiles were normalized to dmax in a homogeneous phantom with no lead shielding and compared. Pinnacle consistently overestimated the dose distal to the lead shielding with significant discrepancies occurring near the edge of the lead shield reaching 25% at the edge and 35% in the open field region. The film measurements showed that a minimum lead margin of 5mm extending beyond the diameter of the lens is required to adequately shield the lens to ≤10% of the dose at dmax. These measurements allow for a reasonable estimate of the dose to the lens from anterior electron beams. They also allow for clinicians to assess the extent of the lead margin required to reduce the lens dose to an acceptable amount prior to radiotherapy treatment.
Author Wronski, M
Sanier, M
Yeboah, C
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: M
  surname: Sanier
  fullname: Sanier, M
– sequence: 2
  givenname: M
  surname: Wronski
  fullname: Wronski, M
– sequence: 3
  givenname: C
  surname: Yeboah
  fullname: Yeboah, C
BackLink https://www.osti.gov/biblio/22407649$$D View this record in Osti.gov
BookMark eNp10MFOAyEQBmBiamKtHnwDEk8etg6wXRZv2tRqUmMP9byh7GyK2YUGqqY3fQef0CeRtl49Acn3T4b_lPScd0jIBYMhY6y8ZsO8VHlZiiPS57kUWc5B9UgfQOUZz2F0Qk5jfAWAQoygT77mPm4w0J_Pb7pYvQU6ecf9gxc36a7bN72x3lHf0BZdpLWPSJvgO6pdylkfKLZoNiGZJeou3lDju7UONh5Sc-ucNi0mX9Opbswqha2hk7uFoI1tuzNy3Og24vnfOSAv95PF-CGbPU8fx7ezzDAAkS0F8KIRWqEptTECl4UyHEaiBplzJSXURvCCg9S6VrVcMqkAhSp0jbIcKTEgl4e56cO2isZu0KyMdy5tX_FUjSzynbo6KBN8jAGbah1sp8O2YlDtGq5Y9ddwstnBftgWt__D6mm-97_1l319
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2014 American Association of Physicists in Medicine
Copyright_xml – notice: 2014 American Association of Physicists in Medicine
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
OTOTI
DOI 10.1118/1.4894883
DatabaseName CrossRef
OSTI.GOV
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList
CrossRef

DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Physics
EISSN 2473-4209
EndPage 12
ExternalDocumentID 22407649
10_1118_1_4894883
MP4883
Genre abstract
GroupedDBID ---
--Z
-DZ
.GJ
0R~
1OB
1OC
29M
2WC
33P
36B
3O-
4.4
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
AAHQN
AAIPD
AAMMB
AAMNL
AANLZ
AAQQT
AASGY
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABCUV
ABDPE
ABEFU
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABQWH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACBEA
ACCZN
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACPOU
ACXBN
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADKYN
ADMLS
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEFGJ
AEGXH
AEIGN
AENEX
AEUYR
AEYWJ
AFBPY
AFFPM
AFWVQ
AGHNM
AGXDD
AGYGG
AHBTC
AIACR
AIAGR
AIDQK
AIDYY
AIQQE
AITYG
AIURR
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMYDB
ASPBG
BFHJK
C45
CS3
DCZOG
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DU5
EBD
EBS
EJD
EMB
EMOBN
F5P
HDBZQ
HGLYW
I-F
KBYEO
LATKE
LEEKS
LH4
LOXES
LUTES
LYRES
MEWTI
O9-
OVD
P2P
P2W
PALCI
PHY
RJQFR
RNS
ROL
SAMSI
SUPJJ
SV3
TEORI
TN5
TWZ
USG
WOHZO
WXSBR
XJT
ZGI
ZVN
ZXP
ZY4
ZZTAW
AAYXX
CITATION
476
AAHHS
AAJUZ
AAPBV
ABCVL
ABFTF
ABPTK
ABTAH
ACCFJ
ACSMX
ADDAD
AEEZP
AEQDE
AEUQT
AIWBW
AJBDE
OTOTI
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c1003-b3026f3a9ec8acc3eb69c2053d07429770dc326207aad9d7b1790e396ade78593
ISSN 0094-2405
IngestDate Fri May 19 00:35:15 EDT 2023
Wed Oct 01 00:25:34 EDT 2025
Sun Sep 21 06:17:23 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 8Part2
Language English
License http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c1003-b3026f3a9ec8acc3eb69c2053d07429770dc326207aad9d7b1790e396ade78593
PageCount 1
ParticipantIDs osti_scitechconnect_22407649
crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4894883
wiley_primary_10_1118_1_4894883_MP4883
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate August 2014
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2014-08-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2014
  text: August 2014
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Medical physics (Lancaster)
PublicationYear 2014
Publisher American Association of Physicists in Medicine
Publisher_xml – name: American Association of Physicists in Medicine
SSID ssj0006350
Score 2.0991144
Snippet The purpose of this work is twofold: 1) to measure dose profiles under lead shielding at the level of the lens for a range of clinical electron energies via...
Abstract only The purpose of this work is twofold: 1) to measure dose profiles under lead shielding at the level of the lens for a range of clinical electron...
SourceID osti
crossref
wiley
SourceType Open Access Repository
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 12
SubjectTerms 60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES
Calibration
COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS
Dosimetry
ELECTRON BEAMS
EYES
FILM DOSIMETRY
Lead
Medical treatment planning
PHANTOMS
RADIATION DOSES
RADIOTHERAPY
SHIELDING
Title Poster — Thur Eve — 26: Evaluation of lens dose from anterior electron beams: comparison of Pinnacle and Gafchromic EBT3 film
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1118%2F1.4894883
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/22407649
Volume 41
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVEBS
  databaseName: Inspec with Full Text
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2473-4209
  dateEnd: 20241102
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0006350
  issn: 0094-2405
  databaseCode: ADMLS
  dateStart: 20070101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.ebsco.com/products/research-databases/inspec-full-text
  providerName: EBSCOhost
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFLZKJxAvCAZohYEshHiJMprYue1tQGFCFFVaJ8ZT5NiO2gcy1KY88AT_gZ_GL9gv2Tm2c6m0SYOXqHEdK_X5em4-F0JeColiuUj9kpcKDBQmfcGE9kG6yijWPOYBJidPP8fHp_zjWXQ2GPztRS1t6uJA_rwyr-R_qApjQFfMkv0HyraLwgB8BvrCFSgM1xvRGDvtYikIF7DAvflis_ImP3RvKIzR6J-0Rb1ROwRJs_YURqqb7BKzuUss_e164niFRhcMPCf7bQq92bKqBLyDOXH4IEq5WGFSszd5M2dY4elbX9VtjoCs78Q4dzHhWthWIK3_4QRz3Fdbftkv8AqunXY79hX4olh0bl3nqAh4GyZX93IDgGn1cGde3Xpw1rWJ_532Iwocz844ngHZs29txkKeMJ-H46zPx20BLYfXdAZUCXuc2QVr697NFdIDMyKCA55mwNdYJyKbsIB2UnTtNKMaTGf4xS2yE4KsGQ_JztG76aeTVkMAJc-mRrlf5ipewcqv21W39KQhwGm5bT4Z_Wd-n9xzhgs9sih8QAa62iV3mo3cJbftDq8fkt8WlvTi1x-KgKQASHMTxoe0AyI9LykCkSIQKQKRNkCkDRCpAeIh7WCITzUwhPmKdjCkCEOKMHxETt9P5m-Pfdfpw5cBBkcWbBzGJROZlqmQkukizmQI8kGh6wZMlLGSDFsnJEKoTCUF1pXTLIuF0glW7HtMhtV5pfcI1RFLIlUmkQQ-I6NAyExFqY6kBL2sHPMRedHsa_7dFnTJrSGc5kHuNn9E9nHHc9BCsZSyxJgzWefG_RHzbEReGUpcv0BuEfDkphOfkrvdX2afDOvVRj8DbbcunjvwXAJ6YaQ3
linkProvider EBSCOhost
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Poster+%E2%80%94+Thur+Eve+%E2%80%94+26%3A+Evaluation+of+lens+dose+from+anterior+electron+beams%3A+comparison+of+Pinnacle+and+Gafchromic+EBT3+film&rft.jtitle=Medical+physics+%28Lancaster%29&rft.au=Sanier%2C+M&rft.au=Wronski%2C+M&rft.au=Yeboah%2C+C&rft.date=2014-08-01&rft.pub=American+Association+of+Physicists+in+Medicine&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=8Part2&rft.spage=12&rft.epage=12&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118%2F1.4894883&rft.externalDBID=10.1118%252F1.4894883&rft.externalDocID=MP4883
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0094-2405&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0094-2405&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0094-2405&client=summon