Validation of specific inhalation challenge for the diagnosis of occupational asthma due to persulphate salts

• Published in: Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England) Vol. 61; no. 10; pp. 861 - 866
• Main Authors: Muñoz, X, Cruz, M J, Orriols, R, Torres, F, Espuga, M, Morell, F
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 01.10.2004; BMJ Publishing Group; BMJ; BMJ Publishing Group LTD; BMJ Group
• Subjects: Adult; Allergies; Asthma; Asthma - chemically induced; Asthma - diagnosis; Barbering; Biological and medical sciences; Bronchial Provocation Tests - methods; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma; ERS; European Respiratory Society; Female; FEV1; Forced Expiratory Volume - physiology; forced expiratory volume in the first second; Hair; Hairdressers; Hairdressing; Histamine; Humans; Immunology; Inhalation; Inhalation Exposure - adverse effects; Lactose; Lungs; Male; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; negative predictive value; NPV; occupational asthma; Occupational diseases; Occupational Diseases - chemically induced; Occupational Diseases - diagnosis; Original; peak expiratory flow; PEF; persulphate salts; Pneumology; positive predictive value; Potassium; Potassium Compounds - toxicity; PPV; Quaternary ammonium compounds; Salts; sensitivity; SIC; Skin; Skin Tests; specific inhalation challenge; specificity; Spirometry; Sulfates - toxicity; threshold limit value; TLV; Vital Capacity - physiology; Human; Allergy; Respiratory disease; Toxicity; Occupational exposure; Asthma; Inhalation; Test validation; Investigation method; Hairdresser; Obstructive pulmonary disease; Diagnosis; Inhalation test; Occupational medicine
• ISSN: 1351-0711; 1470-7926; 1470-7926
• DOI: 10.1136/oem.2004.013177

Background: The significant value of tests used to certify the diagnosis of occupational asthma due to persulphate salts remains uncertain. Aims: To validate the specific inhalation challenge (SIC) test for the diagnosis of occupational asthma. Methods: Eight patients with occupational asthma due to persulphate salts, eight patients with bronchial asthma who were never exposed to persulphate salts, and ten healthy subjects were studied. Clinical history taking, spirometry, bronchial challenge with methacholine, skin prick testing to common inhalant allergens and persulphate salts, total IgE levels, and SIC to potassium persulphate were carried out in all subjects. The SIC used increasing concentrations of potassium persulphate (5, 10, 15, and 30 g) mixed with 150 g of lactose. Patients tipped the mixture from one tray to another at a distance of 30 cm from the face for 10 minutes in a challenge booth. Results: The SIC was positive in all subjects with persulphate induced asthma and in one patient with bronchial asthma who had never been exposed to persulphate salts. Sensitivity was 100% (95% CI 67.6 to 100) and specificity was 87.5% (95% CI 52.9–97.8) when patients with occupational asthma due to persulphate salts were compared with those with bronchial asthma never exposed to persulphate salts. Conclusions: SIC to persulphate salts performed according to the protocol described appears to be useful for the diagnosis of occupational asthma secondary to inhalation of this substance.