Thoracic perfusion of antiangiogenic agents combined with chemotherapy for treating malignant pleural effusion in non-small cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis
ObjectivesDifferent intrathoracic perfusion therapeutic regimens are available for non-small cell lung cancer with malignant pleural effusion (MPE). Antiangiogenic agents are often used to control MPE, and the results are satisfactory. Here, we performed a network meta-analysis to reveal optimal com...
Saved in:
Published in | BMJ open Vol. 14; no. 12; p. e080703 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
British Medical Journal Publishing Group
20.12.2024
BMJ Publishing Group LTD BMJ Publishing Group |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 2044-6055 2044-6055 |
DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080703 |
Cover
Summary: | ObjectivesDifferent intrathoracic perfusion therapeutic regimens are available for non-small cell lung cancer with malignant pleural effusion (MPE). Antiangiogenic agents are often used to control MPE, and the results are satisfactory. Here, we performed a network meta-analysis to reveal optimal combinations of antiangiogenic agents and chemical agents and assess their effectiveness and safety.DesignSystematic review and network meta-analysis.Data sourcesPubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, Wanfang, VIP Database and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure were searched from inception to May 2023. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials that reported on curative effect of MPE.Data extraction and synthesisThe Cochrane Collaboration tool was used to assess risk of bias. The consistency was evaluated by examining the agreement between direct and indirect effects. Network meta-analysis was performed and the ranking probabilities of being at each possible rank for each intervention were estimated. Comparison-adjusted funnel plots were obtained to assess publication bias.ResultsA total of 46 studies were included in the analysis. Among them, we included a total of seven interventions. A total of 3026 patients participated in this analysis. According to the results of the network meta-analysis, some antiangiogenic agents combined with chemotherapy regimens improved objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) and quality of life (QOL). The rank probabilities suggested that in terms of ORR, DCR and QOL, Endostar plus lobaplatin was the first-ranked intervention.ConclusionAdministration of antiangiogenic agents plus chemical agents significantly improved the clinical response and QOL. In addition, Endostar plus lobaplatin was the most effective combination.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021284786. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Original research ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Feature-3 ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise. None declared. |
ISSN: | 2044-6055 2044-6055 |
DOI: | 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080703 |