Supportive care interventions in metastatic bone disease: scoping review

• Published in: BMJ supportive & palliative care p. spcare-2024-004965
• Main Authors: Simister, Samuel K, Bhale, Rahul, Cizik, Amy M, Wise, Barton L, Thorpe, Steven W, Ferrell, Betty, Randall, R Lor, Fauer, Alex
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BMJ Publishing Group LTD 01.11.2024
• Subjects: Bone diseases; Brain research; Breast cancer; Cancer therapies; Caregivers; Clinical trials; Intervention; Lung cancer; Metastasis; Mortality; Nursing; Orthopedics; Ovaries; Pain; Palliative care; Prostate; Quality of life; Radiation therapy; Surgery; Systematic review; Tumors; United States > US; Germany; California; Fatigue; Palliative Care; Supportive care; Pain; Bone; Spiritual care
• ISSN: 2045-435X; 2045-4368
• DOI: 10.1136/spcare-2024-004965

Patients with secondary metastatic involvement of the musculoskeletal system due to primary cancers are a rapidly growing population with significant risks for health-related end-of-life morbidities. In particular, bone metastases or metastatic bone disease (MBD) imparts significant adversity to remaining quality of life. No rigorous review of clinical trials on the use of supportive care interventions for MBD has been conducted. The objective of this review was to examine the characteristics of supportive care interventions for MBD and critically appraise study designs, key findings, and quality of evidence of the research. We searched for published clinical trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses in PubMED, CINAHL and Google Scholar for articles published between September 2017 and September 2022. Some examples of Medical Subject Headings terms were: 'secondary neoplasm', 'metastatic bone disease', 'palliative care' and 'supportive care intervention'. Quality of published evidence was evaluated based on treatment types and study design. After reviewing 572 publications, 13 articles were included in the final review and evaluation including seven clinical trials, two trial protocols and four systematic reviews. Feasible interventions included enhanced palliative care consultation, palliative radiotherapy and alternative medicines. Interventions addressed primary endpoints of fatigue (N=4, 31%), pain (N=3, 23%) or cancer-related symptoms (N=3, 23%) with patient-reported outcome instruments. No interventions reported on fracture complications or endpoints, specifically. The quality of most studies was moderate to strong. Supportive care interventions for MBD are feasible and the impact is measurable via patient-reported outcome measures. While the evidence for interventions was moderate to strong, there are very few specific controlled trials for skeletal-related events and impacts of social determinants of health. Further clinical trials are needed to define supportive care interventions for MBD that demonstrate reduced risk of fracture and that mitigate the reduced quality of life when negative musculoskeletal outcomes arise.