Accuracy of dipole source reconstruction in the 3-layer BEM model against the 5-layer BEM-FMM model

To compare cortical dipole fitting spatial accuracy between the widely used yet highly simplified 3-layer and modern more realistic 5-layer BEM-FMM models with and without (AMR) methods. We generate simulated noiseless 256-channel EEG data from 5-layer (7-compartment) meshes of 15 subjects from the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inbioRxiv
Main Authors Nuñez Ponasso, Guillermo, McSweeney, Ryan C, Wartman, William A, Lai, Peiyao, Haueisen, Jens, Maess, Burkhard, Knösche, Thomas R, Weise, Konstantin, Noetscher, Gregory M, Raij, Tommi, Makaroff, Sergey N
Format Journal Article Paper
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 21.05.2024
Edition1.1
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2692-8205
2692-8205
DOI10.1101/2024.05.17.594750

Cover

More Information
Summary:To compare cortical dipole fitting spatial accuracy between the widely used yet highly simplified 3-layer and modern more realistic 5-layer BEM-FMM models with and without (AMR) methods. We generate simulated noiseless 256-channel EEG data from 5-layer (7-compartment) meshes of 15 subjects from the Connectome Young Adult dataset. For each subject, we test four dipole positions, three sets of conductivity values, and two types of head segmentation. We use the (BEM) with (FMM) acceleration, with or without (AMR), for forward modeling. Dipole fitting is carried out with the FieldTrip MATLAB toolbox. The average position error (across all tested dipoles, subjects, and models) is ~4 mm, with a standard deviation of ~2 mm. The orientation error is ~20° on average, with a standard deviation of ~15°. Without AMR, the numerical inaccuracies produce a larger disagreement between the 3- and 5-layer models, with an average position error of ~8 mm (6 mm standard deviation), and an orientation error of 28° (28° standard deviation). The low-resolution 3-layer models provide excellent accuracy in dipole localization. On the other hand, dipole orientation is retrieved less accurately. Therefore, certain applications may require more realistic models for practical source reconstruction. AMR is a critical component for improving the accuracy of forward EEG computations using a high-resolution 5-layer volume conduction model. Improving EEG source reconstruction accuracy is important for several clinical applications, including epilepsy and other seizure-inducing conditions.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Working Paper/Pre-Print-3
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Competing Interest Statement: The authors have declared no competing interest.
ISSN:2692-8205
2692-8205
DOI:10.1101/2024.05.17.594750