Evaluating Search Systems through Field Codes and Classifications: The Case of the First Published Swedish Nursing Study

The aim of the study was to assess and compare established search systems and approaches by using the search goal of identifying the first (as in oldest) nursing-related document, with reference to the first Swedish-affiliated document, in Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed (Medline). In doing so, t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author Holmberg, Christopher
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 26.11.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
DOI10.48550/arxiv.2311.15349

Cover

Abstract The aim of the study was to assess and compare established search systems and approaches by using the search goal of identifying the first (as in oldest) nursing-related document, with reference to the first Swedish-affiliated document, in Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed (Medline). In doing so, the objective was to provide concrete examples and illustrate how search systems and field code searches versus classification-based searches differ. The Scopus database, Web of Science database aggregator, and the PubMed (Medline) search engine were used for evaluations. Two different search strategies were compared in each database: one guided by field codes (i.e., text-based), and one guided by pre-existing categorizations within database infrastructures. Findings highlight several factors that are important to consider when formulating and executing a search strategy. The findings illustrate important aspects of search systems and search approaches, namely the publication year, delimitations related to a country or region, and features related to a subject or research area. The findings also highlight the importance of prioritizing between different ideals in retrieval. For example, is it more important to reach the oldest records (publication year), to identify as many records as possible (exhaustiveness), or to make sure they are as subject-relevant as possible (e.g., in terms of authors belonging to the same field)? Secondly, researchers using bibliometric methods to analyze research literature should be more transparent when reporting searches, as different search systems and search approaches yield varied numbers and quality of records. While most bibliometric researchers strive to combine different approaches, this is not always made clear in reporting.
AbstractList The aim of the study was to assess and compare established search systems and approaches by using the search goal of identifying the first (as in oldest) nursing-related document, with reference to the first Swedish-affiliated document, in Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed (Medline). In doing so, the objective was to provide concrete examples and illustrate how search systems and field code searches versus classification-based searches differ. The Scopus database, Web of Science database aggregator, and the PubMed (Medline) search engine were used for evaluations. Two different search strategies were compared in each database: one guided by field codes (i.e., text-based), and one guided by pre-existing categorizations within database infrastructures. Findings highlight several factors that are important to consider when formulating and executing a search strategy. The findings illustrate important aspects of search systems and search approaches, namely the publication year, delimitations related to a country or region, and features related to a subject or research area. The findings also highlight the importance of prioritizing between different ideals in retrieval. For example, is it more important to reach the oldest records (publication year), to identify as many records as possible (exhaustiveness), or to make sure they are as subject-relevant as possible (e.g., in terms of authors belonging to the same field)? Secondly, researchers using bibliometric methods to analyze research literature should be more transparent when reporting searches, as different search systems and search approaches yield varied numbers and quality of records. While most bibliometric researchers strive to combine different approaches, this is not always made clear in reporting.
Author Holmberg, Christopher
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Christopher
  surname: Holmberg
  fullname: Holmberg, Christopher
BackLink https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.15349$$DView paper in arXiv
BookMark eNotkM9Og0AYxPegB60-gCf3BajsH5bizZBWmzRqAnfysftt2YSC2YVa3l5ETzOX30xmbslV13dIyAOL13KTJPET-Is7r7lgbM0SIbMbctmeoR1hcN2RFgheN7SYwoCnQIfG9-OxoTuHraF5bzBQ6GbXQgjOOj1TfReeadkgzSEg7e0M4Qz4MNDPsW5daNDQ4hvN7Oj76MPSM4xmuiPXFtqA9_-6IuVuW-Zv0eHjdZ-_HCJQXEQ8yzjHFI2VurYCUMVJbdLUcC1MLaWStVRWMqETZBJnhlsOGy61FUrHSqzI41_sMr368u4Efqp-L6iWC8QP3IBZ-Q
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Copyright_xml – notice: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
DBID AKY
GOX
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2311.15349
DatabaseName arXiv Computer Science
arXiv.org
DatabaseTitleList
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: GOX
  name: arXiv.org
  url: http://arxiv.org/find
  sourceTypes: Open Access Repository
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
ExternalDocumentID 2311_15349
GroupedDBID AKY
GOX
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-a623-29922e7edf4cbf3ae605bd77d2c3db4464b46f413c5e14ea622f2a824cf36c063
IEDL.DBID GOX
IngestDate Tue Jul 22 23:02:29 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly false
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-a623-29922e7edf4cbf3ae605bd77d2c3db4464b46f413c5e14ea622f2a824cf36c063
OpenAccessLink https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.15349
ParticipantIDs arxiv_primary_2311_15349
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2023-11-26
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-11-26
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2023
  text: 2023-11-26
  day: 26
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationYear 2023
Score 1.8551342
SecondaryResourceType preprint
Snippet The aim of the study was to assess and compare established search systems and approaches by using the search goal of identifying the first (as in oldest)...
SourceID arxiv
SourceType Open Access Repository
SubjectTerms Computer Science - Databases
Computer Science - Digital Libraries
Title Evaluating Search Systems through Field Codes and Classifications: The Case of the First Published Swedish Nursing Study
URI https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.15349
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwdV09T8MwED21nVgQCFD51A2sAdV2nIQNRa0qJGCgSNkqfwJLitoC5d9zdlzBwhjHt7yTde_su3cAl9aUpsydzjg3MgsPhpmSVmZFkPYelVbbqM5__yCnz-KuyZse4LYXRi03b5-dPrBeXRP5GF3RmRRVH_pEFEIz72PTPU5GKa60_3cfccy49CdITPZgN7E7vO3csQ891x7AZpwUtdsX7Kp7MemEY5qSg5NQR4b1wroVUmqPcVRlKOLp7tNukLyJNQUcXHgycmRArA23Ne0Wn75Cf-0rpuQfQ3ng9yHMJuNZPc3SwAPCh4WRahVjrnDWC6M9V45SDW2LwjLDrSYchRbSU9QxuRsJRzbMM1UyYTyXhrjGEQzaReuGgCrnimluJXOV8MbrnD6cFIYLFSRpjmEYYZq_d5oW84DgPCJ48v-vU9gJ09ZDKx6TZzBYLz_cOcXktb6IjvkB81SN9A
linkProvider Cornell University
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating+Search+Systems+through+Field+Codes+and+Classifications%3A+The+Case+of+the+First+Published+Swedish+Nursing+Study&rft.au=Holmberg%2C+Christopher&rft.date=2023-11-26&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550%2Farxiv.2311.15349&rft.externalDocID=2311_15349