Rethinking the Area of Protection “Natural Resources” in Life Cycle Assessment

• Published in: Environmental science & technology Vol. 49; no. 9; pp. 5310 - 5317
• Main Authors: Dewulf, Jo, Benini, Lorenzo, Mancini, Lucia, Sala, Serenella, Blengini, Gian Andrea, Ardente, Fulvio, Recchioni, Marco, Maes, Joachim, Pant, Rana, Pennington, David
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States American Chemical Society 05.05.2015
• Subjects: assets; Conservation of Natural Resources; Ecosystem; ecosystem services; Environmental impact; human health; Humans; life cycle impact assessment; life cycle sustainability assessment; Natural Resources; Product life cycle; supply chain
• ISSN: 0013-936X; 1520-5851; 1520-5851
• DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00734

Life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) in classical life cycle assessment (LCA) aims at analyzing potential impacts of products and services typically on three so-called areas of protection (AoPs): Natural Environment, Human Health, and Natural Resources. This paper proposes an elaboration of the AoP Natural Resources. It starts with analyzing different perspectives on Natural Resources as they are somehow sandwiched in between the Natural Environment (their cradle) and the human-industrial environment (their application). Reflecting different viewpoints, five perspectives are developed with the suggestion to select three in function of classical LCA. They result in three safeguard subjects: the Asset of Natural Resources, their Provisioning Capacity, and their role in Global Functions. Whereas the Provisioning Capacity is fully in function of humans, the global functions go beyond provisioning as they include nonprovisioning functions for humans and regulating and maintenance services for the globe as a whole, following the ecosystem services framework. A fourth and fifth safeguard subject has been identified: recognizing the role Natural Resources for human welfare, either specifically as building block in supply chains of products and services as such, either with or without their functions beyond provisioning. But as these are far broader as they in principle should include characterization of mechanisms within the human industrial society, they are considered as subjects for an integrated sustainability assessment (LCSA: life cycle sustainability assessment), that is, incorporating social, economic and environmental issues.