A Multi-Institutional International Analysis of Textbook Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Curative-Intent Resection of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

IMPORTANCE: Composite measures may be superior to individual measures for the analysis of hospital performance and quality of surgical care. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of a so-called textbook outcome, a composite measure of the quality of surgical care, among patients undergoing curative-...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJAMA surgery Vol. 154; no. 6; p. e190571
Main Authors Merath, Katiuscha, Chen, Qinyu, Bagante, Fabio, Alexandrescu, Sorin, Marques, Hugo P, Aldrighetti, Luca, Maithel, Shishir K, Pulitano, Carlo, Weiss, Matthew J, Bauer, Todd W, Shen, Feng, Poultsides, George A, Soubrane, Olivier, Martel, Guillaume, Koerkamp, B. Groot, Guglielmi, Alfredo, Itaru, Endo, Cloyd, Jordan M, Pawlik, Timothy M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Medical Association 01.06.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2168-6254
2168-6262
2168-6262
DOI10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0571

Cover

Abstract IMPORTANCE: Composite measures may be superior to individual measures for the analysis of hospital performance and quality of surgical care. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of a so-called textbook outcome, a composite measure of the quality of surgical care, among patients undergoing curative-intent resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study involved an analysis of a multinational, multi-institutional cohort of patient from 15 major hepatobiliary centers in North America, Europe, Australia, and Asia who underwent curative-intent resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma between 1993 and 2015. Data analysis was conducted from April 2018 to May 2018. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Hospital variation in the composite end point of textbook outcome, defined as negative margins, no perioperative transfusion, no postoperative surgical complications, no prolonged length of stay, no 30-day readmissions, and no 30-day mortality. Secondary end points were factors associated with achieving textbook outcomes. RESULTS: Among 687 patients (of whom 370 [53.9%] were men; median patient age, 61 [range, 18-86] years) undergoing curative-intent resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, a textbook outcome was achieved in 175 patients (25.5%). Being 60 years or younger (odds ratio [OR], 1.61 [95% CI, 1.04-2.49]; P = .03), absence of preoperative jaundice (OR, 4.40 [95% CI, 1.28-15.15]; P = .02), no neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OR, 2.57 [95% CI, 1.05-6.29]; P = .04), T1a/T1b-stage disease (OR, 1.58 [95% CI, 1.01-2.49]; P = .049), N0 status (OR, 3.89 [95% CI, 1.77-8.54]; P = .001), and no bile duct resection (OR, 2.46 [95% CI, 1.25-4.84]; P = .009) were independently associated with achieving a textbook outcome after resection. A prolonged length of stay had the greatest negative association with a textbook outcome. A nomogram to assess the probability of textbook outcome was developed and had good accuracy in both the training data set (area under the curve, 0.755) and validation data set (area under the curve, 0.763). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this study, while hepatic resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was performed with less than 5% mortality in specialized centers, a textbook outcome was achieved in only approximately 26% of patients. A textbook outcome may be useful for the reporting of patient-level hospital performance and hospital variation, leading to quality improvement efforts after resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
AbstractList Composite measures may be superior to individual measures for the analysis of hospital performance and quality of surgical care. To determine the incidence of a so-called textbook outcome, a composite measure of the quality of surgical care, among patients undergoing curative-intent resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. This cohort study involved an analysis of a multinational, multi-institutional cohort of patient from 15 major hepatobiliary centers in North America, Europe, Australia, and Asia who underwent curative-intent resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma between 1993 and 2015. Data analysis was conducted from April 2018 to May 2018. Hospital variation in the composite end point of textbook outcome, defined as negative margins, no perioperative transfusion, no postoperative surgical complications, no prolonged length of stay, no 30-day readmissions, and no 30-day mortality. Secondary end points were factors associated with achieving textbook outcomes. Among 687 patients (of whom 370 [53.9%] were men; median patient age, 61 [range, 18-86] years) undergoing curative-intent resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, a textbook outcome was achieved in 175 patients (25.5%). Being 60 years or younger (odds ratio [OR], 1.61 [95% CI, 1.04-2.49]; P = .03), absence of preoperative jaundice (OR, 4.40 [95% CI, 1.28-15.15]; P = .02), no neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OR, 2.57 [95% CI, 1.05-6.29]; P = .04), T1a/T1b-stage disease (OR, 1.58 [95% CI, 1.01-2.49]; P = .049), N0 status (OR, 3.89 [95% CI, 1.77-8.54]; P = .001), and no bile duct resection (OR, 2.46 [95% CI, 1.25-4.84]; P = .009) were independently associated with achieving a textbook outcome after resection. A prolonged length of stay had the greatest negative association with a textbook outcome. A nomogram to assess the probability of textbook outcome was developed and had good accuracy in both the training data set (area under the curve, 0.755) and validation data set (area under the curve, 0.763). In this study, while hepatic resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was performed with less than 5% mortality in specialized centers, a textbook outcome was achieved in only approximately 26% of patients. A textbook outcome may be useful for the reporting of patient-level hospital performance and hospital variation, leading to quality improvement efforts after resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Composite measures may be superior to individual measures for the analysis of hospital performance and quality of surgical care.ImportanceComposite measures may be superior to individual measures for the analysis of hospital performance and quality of surgical care.To determine the incidence of a so-called textbook outcome, a composite measure of the quality of surgical care, among patients undergoing curative-intent resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.ObjectiveTo determine the incidence of a so-called textbook outcome, a composite measure of the quality of surgical care, among patients undergoing curative-intent resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.This cohort study involved an analysis of a multinational, multi-institutional cohort of patient from 15 major hepatobiliary centers in North America, Europe, Australia, and Asia who underwent curative-intent resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma between 1993 and 2015. Data analysis was conducted from April 2018 to May 2018.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study involved an analysis of a multinational, multi-institutional cohort of patient from 15 major hepatobiliary centers in North America, Europe, Australia, and Asia who underwent curative-intent resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma between 1993 and 2015. Data analysis was conducted from April 2018 to May 2018.Hospital variation in the composite end point of textbook outcome, defined as negative margins, no perioperative transfusion, no postoperative surgical complications, no prolonged length of stay, no 30-day readmissions, and no 30-day mortality. Secondary end points were factors associated with achieving textbook outcomes.Main Outcomes and MeasuresHospital variation in the composite end point of textbook outcome, defined as negative margins, no perioperative transfusion, no postoperative surgical complications, no prolonged length of stay, no 30-day readmissions, and no 30-day mortality. Secondary end points were factors associated with achieving textbook outcomes.Among 687 patients (of whom 370 [53.9%] were men; median patient age, 61 [range, 18-86] years) undergoing curative-intent resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, a textbook outcome was achieved in 175 patients (25.5%). Being 60 years or younger (odds ratio [OR], 1.61 [95% CI, 1.04-2.49]; P = .03), absence of preoperative jaundice (OR, 4.40 [95% CI, 1.28-15.15]; P = .02), no neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OR, 2.57 [95% CI, 1.05-6.29]; P = .04), T1a/T1b-stage disease (OR, 1.58 [95% CI, 1.01-2.49]; P = .049), N0 status (OR, 3.89 [95% CI, 1.77-8.54]; P = .001), and no bile duct resection (OR, 2.46 [95% CI, 1.25-4.84]; P = .009) were independently associated with achieving a textbook outcome after resection. A prolonged length of stay had the greatest negative association with a textbook outcome. A nomogram to assess the probability of textbook outcome was developed and had good accuracy in both the training data set (area under the curve, 0.755) and validation data set (area under the curve, 0.763).ResultsAmong 687 patients (of whom 370 [53.9%] were men; median patient age, 61 [range, 18-86] years) undergoing curative-intent resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, a textbook outcome was achieved in 175 patients (25.5%). Being 60 years or younger (odds ratio [OR], 1.61 [95% CI, 1.04-2.49]; P = .03), absence of preoperative jaundice (OR, 4.40 [95% CI, 1.28-15.15]; P = .02), no neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OR, 2.57 [95% CI, 1.05-6.29]; P = .04), T1a/T1b-stage disease (OR, 1.58 [95% CI, 1.01-2.49]; P = .049), N0 status (OR, 3.89 [95% CI, 1.77-8.54]; P = .001), and no bile duct resection (OR, 2.46 [95% CI, 1.25-4.84]; P = .009) were independently associated with achieving a textbook outcome after resection. A prolonged length of stay had the greatest negative association with a textbook outcome. A nomogram to assess the probability of textbook outcome was developed and had good accuracy in both the training data set (area under the curve, 0.755) and validation data set (area under the curve, 0.763).In this study, while hepatic resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was performed with less than 5% mortality in specialized centers, a textbook outcome was achieved in only approximately 26% of patients. A textbook outcome may be useful for the reporting of patient-level hospital performance and hospital variation, leading to quality improvement efforts after resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this study, while hepatic resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was performed with less than 5% mortality in specialized centers, a textbook outcome was achieved in only approximately 26% of patients. A textbook outcome may be useful for the reporting of patient-level hospital performance and hospital variation, leading to quality improvement efforts after resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
IMPORTANCE: Composite measures may be superior to individual measures for the analysis of hospital performance and quality of surgical care. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of a so-called textbook outcome, a composite measure of the quality of surgical care, among patients undergoing curative-intent resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study involved an analysis of a multinational, multi-institutional cohort of patient from 15 major hepatobiliary centers in North America, Europe, Australia, and Asia who underwent curative-intent resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma between 1993 and 2015. Data analysis was conducted from April 2018 to May 2018. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Hospital variation in the composite end point of textbook outcome, defined as negative margins, no perioperative transfusion, no postoperative surgical complications, no prolonged length of stay, no 30-day readmissions, and no 30-day mortality. Secondary end points were factors associated with achieving textbook outcomes. RESULTS: Among 687 patients (of whom 370 [53.9%] were men; median patient age, 61 [range, 18-86] years) undergoing curative-intent resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, a textbook outcome was achieved in 175 patients (25.5%). Being 60 years or younger (odds ratio [OR], 1.61 [95% CI, 1.04-2.49]; P = .03), absence of preoperative jaundice (OR, 4.40 [95% CI, 1.28-15.15]; P = .02), no neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OR, 2.57 [95% CI, 1.05-6.29]; P = .04), T1a/T1b-stage disease (OR, 1.58 [95% CI, 1.01-2.49]; P = .049), N0 status (OR, 3.89 [95% CI, 1.77-8.54]; P = .001), and no bile duct resection (OR, 2.46 [95% CI, 1.25-4.84]; P = .009) were independently associated with achieving a textbook outcome after resection. A prolonged length of stay had the greatest negative association with a textbook outcome. A nomogram to assess the probability of textbook outcome was developed and had good accuracy in both the training data set (area under the curve, 0.755) and validation data set (area under the curve, 0.763). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this study, while hepatic resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was performed with less than 5% mortality in specialized centers, a textbook outcome was achieved in only approximately 26% of patients. A textbook outcome may be useful for the reporting of patient-level hospital performance and hospital variation, leading to quality improvement efforts after resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
This cohort study combines data from 15 hospitals in Asia, North America, Europe, and Australia to determine the incidence of a textbook outcome, a composite measure of the quality of surgical care, among patients undergoing curative-intent resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Author Maithel, Shishir K
Bagante, Fabio
Aldrighetti, Luca
Guglielmi, Alfredo
Bauer, Todd W
Itaru, Endo
Pawlik, Timothy M
Marques, Hugo P
Merath, Katiuscha
Soubrane, Olivier
Pulitano, Carlo
Shen, Feng
Poultsides, George A
Koerkamp, B. Groot
Chen, Qinyu
Alexandrescu, Sorin
Weiss, Matthew J
Martel, Guillaume
Cloyd, Jordan M
AuthorAffiliation 6 Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
14 Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
15 Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan
9 University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
7 University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
11 Stanford University, Stanford, California
3 Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania
13 University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
1 The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus
2 University of Verona, Verona, Italy
8 Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
10 Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Shanghai, China
5 Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
12 Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France
4 Curry Cabral Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 13 University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
– name: 7 University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
– name: 14 Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
– name: 6 Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
– name: 11 Stanford University, Stanford, California
– name: 10 Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Shanghai, China
– name: 15 Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan
– name: 4 Curry Cabral Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal
– name: 5 Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
– name: 3 Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania
– name: 9 University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
– name: 2 University of Verona, Verona, Italy
– name: 12 Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France
– name: 1 The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus
– name: 8 Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Katiuscha
  surname: Merath
  fullname: Merath, Katiuscha
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Qinyu
  surname: Chen
  fullname: Chen, Qinyu
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Fabio
  surname: Bagante
  fullname: Bagante, Fabio
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Sorin
  surname: Alexandrescu
  fullname: Alexandrescu, Sorin
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Hugo P
  surname: Marques
  fullname: Marques, Hugo P
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Luca
  surname: Aldrighetti
  fullname: Aldrighetti, Luca
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Shishir K
  surname: Maithel
  fullname: Maithel, Shishir K
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Carlo
  surname: Pulitano
  fullname: Pulitano, Carlo
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Matthew J
  surname: Weiss
  fullname: Weiss, Matthew J
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Todd W
  surname: Bauer
  fullname: Bauer, Todd W
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Feng
  surname: Shen
  fullname: Shen, Feng
– sequence: 12
  givenname: George A
  surname: Poultsides
  fullname: Poultsides, George A
– sequence: 13
  givenname: Olivier
  surname: Soubrane
  fullname: Soubrane, Olivier
– sequence: 14
  givenname: Guillaume
  surname: Martel
  fullname: Martel, Guillaume
– sequence: 15
  givenname: B. Groot
  surname: Koerkamp
  fullname: Koerkamp, B. Groot
– sequence: 16
  givenname: Alfredo
  surname: Guglielmi
  fullname: Guglielmi, Alfredo
– sequence: 17
  givenname: Endo
  surname: Itaru
  fullname: Itaru, Endo
– sequence: 18
  givenname: Jordan M
  surname: Cloyd
  fullname: Cloyd, Jordan M
– sequence: 19
  givenname: Timothy M
  surname: Pawlik
  fullname: Pawlik, Timothy M
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31017645$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kctu1DAUhi1UREvpC3SBsmSTwZfYiTdIoxGXkYqKULu2HOdkxiWxB9up6JvwuDjMRcACL3w5_v_v2PpfojPnHSB0TfCCYEzePuhRxylsFhQTucC8Js_QBSWiKQUV9Oy059U5uorxAefRYFwx-QKdM4JJLSp-gX4ui8_TkGy5djHZNCXrnR6KtUsQnD6clnl6ijYWvi_u4Edqvf9W3E7J-BFisRy92xRfshhcisW96yBsvM211RRy9RHKGedS8RUimJk5g3It6C3sssIUq60ftNtYb3Qw1vlRv0LPez1EuDqsl-j-w_u71afy5vbjerW8KTUnPJUaul50mFRAe2FYL2qDeV8zQXRDO9FJKWkjAXfQSiFo27aag4SG8U63lDfsEr3bc3dTO0JnYH7WoHbBjjo8Ka-t-vvG2a3a-EclqqZupMyANwdA8N8niEmNNhoY8n_AT1FRSpgkFcciS1__2evU5BhHFjR7gQk-xgC9Mjb9TiG3toMiWM3hq2P4ag5fzeFnK_3HeqT_13S9N-Wrk57WjDDcsF_-28MP
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1002_jso_27170
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_020_08279_y
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_023_05639_3
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2021_06_028
crossref_primary_10_1093_bjsopen_zraa031
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_020_08549_9
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000035249
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_022_12832_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jviscsurg_2023_07_007
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejso_2022_12_009
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2022_09_008
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2021_12_010
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_023_13752_5
crossref_primary_10_1002_jso_26087
crossref_primary_10_1097_JS9_0000000000000251
crossref_primary_10_1002_wjs_12345
crossref_primary_10_1002_jso_25833
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_020_04767_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2020_04_015
crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000005749
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00423_020_01908_w
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_021_05129_4
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_020_09470_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2023_02_002
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00423_022_02578_6
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_020_04748_7
crossref_primary_10_1097_XCS_0000000000000221
crossref_primary_10_1001_jamasurg_2021_2064
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhep_2020_08_005
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2022_964614
crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v31_i11_100911
crossref_primary_10_1002_lary_29720
crossref_primary_10_1001_jamanetworkopen_2022_32171
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2021_09_016
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_023_14146_3
crossref_primary_10_1002_jso_26778
crossref_primary_10_1002_jso_26136
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2019_12_005
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_021_08531_w
crossref_primary_10_2147_JHC_S454666
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm10173867
crossref_primary_10_14218_JCTH_2021_00250
crossref_primary_10_1097_JS9_0000000000000510
crossref_primary_10_1002_jhbp_1351
crossref_primary_10_1055_a_2069_6588
crossref_primary_10_4240_wjgs_v15_i10_2259
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00268_020_05625_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gassur_2025_102005
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00423_022_02474_z
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_022_09780_z
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2023_07_898
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00423_021_02210_z
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_suronc_2020_11_006
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12957_023_03138_y
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jval_2020_05_011
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amjsurg_2021_05_014
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejso_2023_107080
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41416_022_01710_z
crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000005849
crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000004916
crossref_primary_10_1097_SAP_0000000000003950
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_019_04504_6
crossref_primary_10_1111_petr_14885
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2022_11_027
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_xjon_2023_05_003
crossref_primary_10_3389_fsurg_2022_969418
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2022_07_024
crossref_primary_10_1097_AS9_0000000000000237
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2021_05_013
crossref_primary_10_1002_jso_25900
crossref_primary_10_1002_jso_25861
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2022_09_020
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_022_11721_y
crossref_primary_10_1002_cam4_7186
crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000004989
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00268_020_05943_y
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhepr_2020_100153
crossref_primary_10_1080_17474124_2020_1765771
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_020_08548_w
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejso_2024_108477
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_022_12834_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhep_2020_05_003
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_021_10316_3
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10549_022_06820_z
crossref_primary_10_6002_ect_2020_0417
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2020_05_042
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhep_2020_07_002
crossref_primary_10_1002_jso_25872
crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000005668
crossref_primary_10_1097_CM9_0000000000002695
crossref_primary_10_1002_jso_26204
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2022_975136
crossref_primary_10_1097_XCS_0000000000000301
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_024_16714_7
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_024_12091_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejso_2024_108002
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_022_06002_5
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00268_021_06255_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jtcvs_2023_02_019
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2024_109062
crossref_primary_10_1097_AS9_0000000000000250
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_023_11695_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijsu_2020_10_014
crossref_primary_10_1097_JS9_0000000000001390
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00423_022_02467_y
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2022_05_012
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_022_05413_x
crossref_primary_10_1097_TXD_0000000000001322
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_020_08621_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gassur_2024_02_027
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers16091721
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13304_022_01237_1
crossref_primary_10_1002_wjs_12277
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhep_2022_04_036
crossref_primary_10_1111_ctr_14588
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00268_021_06115_2
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_024_10757_3
crossref_primary_10_1111_ans_16555
crossref_primary_10_1111_codi_15912
crossref_primary_10_1001_jamasurg_2023_7468
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_019_08067_3
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2023_06_019
crossref_primary_10_3389_fgene_2022_958290
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_iliver_2022_10_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eclinm_2023_102188
crossref_primary_10_1097_JS9_0000000000000793
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2021_10_021
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_021_05093_z
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2024_12_013
crossref_primary_10_1097_JS9_0000000000000303
crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000003628
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2021_08_015
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2024_02_021
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_021_10478_0
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00270_023_03375_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhepr_2020_100190
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soi_2024_100012
crossref_primary_10_1093_bjsopen_zrac149
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejso_2024_107972
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_yasu_2022_03_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jchirv_2023_04_017
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2020_05_038
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2024_07_022
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_022_12803_7
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_023_05673_1
crossref_primary_10_1002_jhbp_1148
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00423_023_03023_y
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejvs_2020_06_012
crossref_primary_10_1097_XCS_0000000000000937
crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v27_i15_1524
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejso_2022_06_012
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_020_08635_y
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_024_15983_6
crossref_primary_10_1177_21501351231215261
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.07.032
10.1001/jamasurg.2013.4109
10.1016/j.ejso.2012.10.007
10.1177/016327878500800301
10.1016/j.surg.2013.12.001
10.1177/0951484813512287
10.1097/SLA.0000000000001849
10.1177/0272989X09357474
10.1007/s11605-017-3652-2
10.1001/jama.292.7.847
10.1007/s11605-013-2349-4
10.1111/bju.2011.108.issue-6
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.11.078
10.1016/S0003-4975(01)03222-2
10.1002/bjs.2017.104.issue-6
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4713
10.1002/jso.v117.5
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.08.001
10.1017/CBO9780511802843
10.1097/SLA.0000000000000931
10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019405
10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0142
10.1016/j.surg.2013.03.013
10.1002/bjs.2018.105.issue-7
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.09.012
10.1177/0272989X10386799
10.7326/0003-4819-157-1-201206190-00429
10.1007/s11605-015-2776-5
10.1007/s11605-012-1938-y
10.1111/hesr.2012.47.issue-5
10.1377/hlthaff.28.4.1189
10.1002/jso.v115.6
10.1097/00005650-199306000-00008
10.1097/SLA.0000000000002388
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.10.020
10.1001/jamasurg.2015.2215
10.1007/s11605-018-3783-0
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright 2019 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright 2019 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0571
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic


Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
DocumentTitleAlternate Textbook Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Curative-Intent Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Resection
EISSN 2168-6262
ExternalDocumentID PMC6487899
31017645
10_1001_jamasurg_2019_0571
2731308
Genre Multicenter Study
Journal Article
GeographicLocations Austria
Asia
North America
Europe
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Austria
– name: Asia
– name: Europe
– name: North America
GroupedDBID 0R~
4.4
AAWTL
ABBLC
ABJNI
ACDNT
ACGFS
ADBBV
AENEX
AHMBA
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMJDE
ANMPU
BRYMA
C45
EBD
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
EX3
GX1
OB2
OBH
OHH
OVD
PQQKQ
RAJ
SV3
TEORI
WOW
AAYXX
CITATION
H13
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-a515t-aedf6d014e2f6c3f67c05f7361a82d6d999289e0deb9662bbba5e9e835dab2583
ISSN 2168-6254
2168-6262
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 14:11:29 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 22:22:00 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:59:14 EST 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:58:39 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:28:30 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 05 02:03:52 EDT 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-a515t-aedf6d014e2f6c3f67c05f7361a82d6d999289e0deb9662bbba5e9e835dab2583
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6487899
PMID 31017645
PQID 2213914506
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6487899
proquest_miscellaneous_2213914506
pubmed_primary_31017645
crossref_citationtrail_10_1001_jamasurg_2019_0571
crossref_primary_10_1001_jamasurg_2019_0571
ama_primary_2731308
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2019-06-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2019-06-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2019
  text: 2019-06-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle JAMA surgery
PublicationTitleAlternate JAMA Surg
PublicationYear 2019
Publisher American Medical Association
Publisher_xml – name: American Medical Association
References Dimick (soi190016r11) 2004; 292
Donabedian (soi190016r3) 1985; 8
Dijs-Elsinga (soi190016r1) 2010; 30
Hyder (soi190016r28) 2013; 17
Zhang (soi190016r36) 2018; 22
Merath (soi190016r5) 2018; 22
Dimick (soi190016r12) 2008; 206
Ishikawa (soi190016r30) 1993; 31
Karthaus (soi190016r17) 2017; 266
Bagante (soi190016r35) 2015; 221
Dimick (soi190016r14) 2012; 47
Lucas (soi190016r8) 2014; 155
Mayer (soi190016r21) 2011; 108
Zhang (soi190016r37) 2018; 105
Lawson (soi190016r22) 2014; 260
Kneuertz (soi190016r6) 2012; 16
Dimick (soi190016r13) 2014; 149
Salet (soi190016r19) 2018; 8
Davison (soi190016r20) 1997
Kolfschoten (soi190016r15) 2013; 39
Ferraris (soi190016r26) 2011; 91
Tiessen (soi190016r29) 2013; 26
Gani (soi190016r7) 2015; 150
Schneider (soi190016r27) 2013; 154
Shariat (soi190016r31) 2008; 14
soi190016r23
Marang-van de Mheen (soi190016r16) 2011; 31
Ejaz (soi190016r24) 2015; 19
Rössler (soi190016r2) 2016; 264
Spolverato (soi190016r38) 2017; 115
Shahian (soi190016r10) 2001; 72
Merath (soi190016r32) 2018; 117
Mavros (soi190016r33) 2012; 215
Parina (soi190016r4) 2015; 220
Shimada (soi190016r34) 1997; 79
Carson (soi190016r25) 2012; 157
Dimick (soi190016r9) 2009; 28
Busweiler (soi190016r18) 2017; 104
31017642 - JAMA Surg. 2019 Jun 1;154(6):e190572
References_xml – volume: 206
  start-page: 13
  issue: 1
  year: 2008
  ident: soi190016r12
  article-title: The zero mortality paradox in surgery.
  publication-title: J Am Coll Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.07.032
– volume: 149
  start-page: 10
  issue: 1
  year: 2014
  ident: soi190016r13
  article-title: Composite measures for profiling hospitals on bariatric surgery performance.
  publication-title: JAMA Surg
  doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.4109
– volume: 39
  start-page: 156
  issue: 2
  year: 2013
  ident: soi190016r15
  article-title: Focusing on desired outcomes of care after colon cancer resections; hospital variations in ‘textbook outcome’.
  publication-title: Eur J Surg Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2012.10.007
– volume: 8
  start-page: 243
  issue: 3
  year: 1985
  ident: soi190016r3
  article-title: Twenty years of research on the quality of medical care: 1964-1984.
  publication-title: Eval Health Prof
  doi: 10.1177/016327878500800301
– volume: 155
  start-page: 593
  issue: 4
  year: 2014
  ident: soi190016r8
  article-title: Quality improvement in gastrointestinal surgical oncology with American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
  publication-title: Surgery
  doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.12.001
– volume: 26
  start-page: 86
  issue: 2-3
  year: 2013
  ident: soi190016r29
  article-title: What causes international variations in length of stay: a comparative analysis for two inpatient conditions in Japanese and Canadian hospitals.
  publication-title: Health Serv Manage Res
  doi: 10.1177/0951484813512287
– volume: 264
  start-page: 492
  issue: 3
  year: 2016
  ident: soi190016r2
  article-title: Defining benchmarks for major liver surgery: a multicenter analysis of 5202 living liver donors.
  publication-title: Ann Surg
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001849
– volume: 30
  start-page: 544
  issue: 5
  year: 2010
  ident: soi190016r1
  article-title: Choosing a hospital for surgery: the importance of information on quality of care.
  publication-title: Med Decis Making
  doi: 10.1177/0272989X09357474
– volume: 22
  start-page: 668
  issue: 4
  year: 2018
  ident: soi190016r36
  article-title: Lymphadenectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: has nodal evaluation been increasingly adopted by surgeons over time? a national database analysis.
  publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3652-2
– volume: 292
  start-page: 847
  issue: 7
  year: 2004
  ident: soi190016r11
  article-title: Surgical mortality as an indicator of hospital quality: the problem with small sample size.
  publication-title: JAMA
  doi: 10.1001/jama.292.7.847
– volume: 17
  start-page: 2114
  issue: 12
  year: 2013
  ident: soi190016r28
  article-title: Impact of hospital teaching status on length of stay and mortality among patients undergoing complex hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery in the USA.
  publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2349-4
– volume: 108
  start-page: 844
  issue: 6
  year: 2011
  ident: soi190016r21
  article-title: What is the role of risk-adjusted funnel plots in the analysis of radical cystectomy volume-outcome relationships?
  publication-title: BJU Int
  doi: 10.1111/bju.2011.108.issue-6
– volume: 91
  start-page: 944
  issue: 3
  year: 2011
  ident: soi190016r26
  article-title: 2011 update to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists blood conservation clinical practice guidelines.
  publication-title: Ann Thorac Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.11.078
– volume: 72
  start-page: 2155
  issue: 6
  year: 2001
  ident: soi190016r10
  article-title: Cardiac surgery report cards: comprehensive review and statistical critique.
  publication-title: Ann Thorac Surg
  doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(01)03222-2
– volume: 104
  start-page: 742
  issue: 6
  year: 2017
  ident: soi190016r18
  article-title: Textbook outcome as a composite measure in oesophagogastric cancer surgery.
  publication-title: Br J Surg
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.2017.104.issue-6
– volume: 14
  start-page: 4400
  issue: 14
  year: 2008
  ident: soi190016r31
  article-title: Comparison of nomograms with other methods for predicting outcomes in prostate cancer: a critical analysis of the literature.
  publication-title: Clin Cancer Res
  doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4713
– volume: 117
  start-page: 868
  issue: 5
  year: 2018
  ident: soi190016r32
  article-title: Nomogram predicting the risk of recurrence after curative-intent resection of primary non-metastatic gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors: an analysis of the U.S. Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group.
  publication-title: J Surg Oncol
  doi: 10.1002/jso.v117.5
– volume: 215
  start-page: 820
  issue: 6
  year: 2012
  ident: soi190016r33
  article-title: A systematic review: treatment and prognosis of patients with fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma.
  publication-title: J Am Coll Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.08.001
– volume-title: Bootstrap Methods and Their Application
  year: 1997
  ident: soi190016r20
  doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511802843
– volume: 260
  start-page: 668
  issue: 4
  year: 2014
  ident: soi190016r22
  article-title: Measuring risk-adjusted value using Medicare and ACS-NSQIP: is high-quality, low-cost surgical care achievable everywhere?
  publication-title: Ann Surg
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000931
– volume: 8
  start-page: e019405
  issue: 2
  year: 2018
  ident: soi190016r19
  article-title: Is textbook outcome a valuable composite measure for short-term outcomes of gastrointestinal treatments in the Netherlands using hospital information system data? a retrospective cohort study.
  publication-title: BMJ Open
  doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019405
– volume: 79
  start-page: 892
  issue: 5
  year: 1997
  ident: soi190016r34
  article-title: The role of lymph node dissection in the treatment of gallbladder carcinoma.
  publication-title: Cancer
  doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0142
– volume: 154
  start-page: 152
  issue: 2
  year: 2013
  ident: soi190016r27
  article-title: Provider versus patient factors impacting hospital length of stay after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
  publication-title: Surgery
  doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.03.013
– volume: 105
  start-page: 857
  issue: 7
  year: 2018
  ident: soi190016r37
  article-title: Trends in use of lymphadenectomy in surgery with curative intent for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
  publication-title: Br J Surg
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.2018.105.issue-7
– volume: 221
  start-page: 1031
  issue: 6
  year: 2015
  ident: soi190016r35
  article-title: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: prognosis of patients who did not undergo lymphadenectomy.
  publication-title: J Am Coll Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.09.012
– volume: 31
  start-page: 816
  issue: 6
  year: 2011
  ident: soi190016r16
  article-title: The relative importance of quality of care information when choosing a hospital for surgical treatment: a hospital choice experiment.
  publication-title: Med Decis Making
  doi: 10.1177/0272989X10386799
– volume: 157
  start-page: 49
  issue: 1
  year: 2012
  ident: soi190016r25
  article-title: Red blood cell transfusion: a clinical practice guideline from the AABB*.
  publication-title: Ann Intern Med
  doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-1-201206190-00429
– volume: 19
  start-page: 887
  issue: 5
  year: 2015
  ident: soi190016r24
  article-title: Impact of blood transfusions and transfusion practices on long-term outcome following hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery.
  publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2776-5
– volume: 16
  start-page: 1727
  issue: 9
  year: 2012
  ident: soi190016r6
  article-title: Risk of morbidity and mortality following hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery.
  publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-1938-y
– volume: 47
  start-page: 1861
  issue: 5
  year: 2012
  ident: soi190016r14
  article-title: Composite measures for rating hospital quality with major surgery.
  publication-title: Health Serv Res
  doi: 10.1111/hesr.2012.47.issue-5
– volume: 28
  start-page: 1189
  issue: 4
  year: 2009
  ident: soi190016r9
  article-title: Composite measures for predicting surgical mortality in the hospital.
  publication-title: Health Aff (Millwood)
  doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.4.1189
– volume: 115
  start-page: 696
  issue: 6
  year: 2017
  ident: soi190016r38
  article-title: Comparative performances of the 7th and the 8th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging systems for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
  publication-title: J Surg Oncol
  doi: 10.1002/jso.v115.6
– volume: 31
  start-page: 542
  issue: 6
  year: 1993
  ident: soi190016r30
  article-title: Performance, characteristics, and case mix in Japanese and American teaching hospitals.
  publication-title: Med Care
  doi: 10.1097/00005650-199306000-00008
– ident: soi190016r23
– volume: 266
  start-page: 898
  issue: 5
  year: 2017
  ident: soi190016r17
  article-title: Textbook outcome: a composite measure for quality of elective aneurysm surgery.
  publication-title: Ann Surg
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002388
– volume: 220
  start-page: 169
  issue: 2
  year: 2015
  ident: soi190016r4
  article-title: Is a low readmission rate indicative of a good hospital?
  publication-title: J Am Coll Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.10.020
– volume: 150
  start-page: 1042
  issue: 11
  year: 2015
  ident: soi190016r7
  article-title: Understanding variation in 30-day surgical readmission in the era of accountable care: effect of the patient, surgeon, and surgical subspecialties.
  publication-title: JAMA Surg
  doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.2215
– volume: 22
  start-page: 1538
  issue: 9
  year: 2018
  ident: soi190016r5
  article-title: The impact of discharge timing on readmission following hepatopancreatobiliary surgery: a nationwide readmission database analysis.
  publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3783-0
– reference: 31017642 - JAMA Surg. 2019 Jun 1;154(6):e190572
SSID ssj0000800439
Score 2.6331415
Snippet IMPORTANCE: Composite measures may be superior to individual measures for the analysis of hospital performance and quality of surgical care. OBJECTIVE: To...
Composite measures may be superior to individual measures for the analysis of hospital performance and quality of surgical care. To determine the incidence of...
Composite measures may be superior to individual measures for the analysis of hospital performance and quality of surgical care.ImportanceComposite measures...
This cohort study combines data from 15 hospitals in Asia, North America, Europe, and Australia to determine the incidence of a textbook outcome, a composite...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
ama
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage e190571
SubjectTerms Adolescent
Adult
Age Distribution
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Asia - epidemiology
Austria - epidemiology
Bile Duct Neoplasms - mortality
Bile Duct Neoplasms - surgery
Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic - surgery
Cholangiocarcinoma - mortality
Cholangiocarcinoma - surgery
Europe - epidemiology
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Hepatectomy
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
North America - epidemiology
Online First
Online Only
Original Investigation
Retrospective Studies
Sex Distribution
Survival Rate - trends
Young Adult
Title A Multi-Institutional International Analysis of Textbook Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Curative-Intent Resection of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
URI http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0571
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31017645
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2213914506
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC6487899
Volume 154
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lj5tADB6l20svVd9NX5pKvSFWYYABjtGq1bZSX1JWyg0NMCRIFawSOLS_ZP_C_sva8-CRbKtuLyghxBriLx7b2J8JeefLMPG9sHQlC3I3SAR3RRIUbslKnoOLwX31RPfzF35-EXxah-vZ7HpUtdS12Wn-68a-kv_RKpwDvWKX7C002wuFE_Aa9AtH0DAc_0nHS0f1z7qVeeKv03rTJN-YdWQFlhi9audr18J65N5ZqllD3zS5KtbKFHK3aVQtQKc5wV1V5N6qEr3cupcfMSW8lZeK7vUMw-N6U8GuuMurujGW3nq8YNWd_aj5WrH9guytKeaoOgiwh3oh0y3yvap_dkOadYMAUI62yHTlmEKp7s7ZyX3eqTQuVhOO8xjYOmXrrbS5Yx6PXYjGgoltNm-rI0srwZMJ9fSWo11gmD6At4f1e8mpvXhKuX2wFfYFiprMGUIjIyNFGSnKuEPusgggjH3la69P56HjHai5df19mBYty3E1XcqY2Nc6Q0cRzmGh7sjzWT0g903IQpcafw_JTNaPydWS3oA9OsEetdijTUkt9qjFHlXYoxZ7dMAePcAe7bGHgsbYo8fYe0IuPrxfnZ27ZsqHK8CXbl0hi5IXEKlLNA9-yaN8EZaRzz0Rs4IXEMGwOJGLQmYQmrMsy0QoEwmRQyEyFsb-U3JSN7V8TiiLcjA8OVIt-zhZQSRxKT3pR6JM_FjEc_IIfvT0UvO4pOC5gwcHZz2rhDQ3xPg4n-VH-mcUzInTf8eK-9vVb61uU7De-EhO1LLp9iljEIF5Qbjgc_JM67qX5-NuyYNwTqIJCvoLkBl--kldbRVDPA_iKE6SF7da5Utyb_hfviIn7a6Tr8HjbrM3Cuu_AS1B4U4
linkProvider Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+Multi-institutional+International+Analysis+of+Textbook+Outcomes+Among+Patients+Undergoing+Curative-Intent+Resection+of+Intrahepatic+Cholangiocarcinoma&rft.jtitle=JAMA+surgery&rft.au=Merath%2C+Katiuscha&rft.au=Chen%2C+Qinyu&rft.au=Bagante%2C+Fabio&rft.au=Alexandrescu%2C+Sorin&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.issn=2168-6254&rft.volume=154&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e190571&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001%2Fjamasurg.2019.0571&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1001_jamasurg_2019_0571
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2168-6254&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2168-6254&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2168-6254&client=summon