Improved AHP Method and Its Application in Risk Identification

AbstractThe analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach has been widely used in multicriteria decision making (MCDM). It is very difficult to meet the consistency requirement of a comparison matrix (CM) in AHP. The authors analyze the reasons for inconsistent CM in AHP and propose an improved AHP (IAH...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of construction engineering and management Vol. 139; no. 3; pp. 312 - 320
Main Authors Li, Fengwei, Phoon, Kok Kwang, Du, Xiuli, Zhang, Mingju
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Reston, VA American Society of Civil Engineers 01.03.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0733-9364
1943-7862
1943-7862
DOI10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000605

Cover

More Information
Summary:AbstractThe analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach has been widely used in multicriteria decision making (MCDM). It is very difficult to meet the consistency requirement of a comparison matrix (CM) in AHP. The authors analyze the reasons for inconsistent CM in AHP and propose an improved AHP (IAHP) to improve CM consistency by using a sorting and ranking methodology. The results of comparing AHP with IAHP by MATLAB simulation show that IAHP is more suitable for solving MCDM problems when the number of elements or factors is 5 or more in MCDM. A case study is presented to illustrate the performance of IAHP when applied to risk identification during an open-cut subway construction. The application results show that IAHP is superior to AHP in terms of CM consistency, information extraction effectiveness, and convenience in practical implementation.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0733-9364
1943-7862
1943-7862
DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000605