Influence of Spin Coating and Dip Coating with Gelatin/Hydroxyapatite for Bioresorbable Mg Alloy Orthopedic Implants: In Vitro and In Vivo Studies

Suitable biomechanical properties, good biocompatibility, and osteoconductivity of a degradable magnesium (Mg) alloy make it a potential material for orthopedic implants. The main limitation of Mg is its high corrosion rate in the human body. Surface modification is necessary to improve the Mg corro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inACS biomaterials science & engineering Vol. 9; no. 2; pp. 705 - 718
Main Authors Tran, Duong-Thuy, Chen, Fang-Hsu, Wu, Guan-Lin, Ching, Paula Carmela O., Yeh, Ming-Long
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Chemical Society 13.02.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2373-9878
2373-9878
DOI10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c01122

Cover

Abstract Suitable biomechanical properties, good biocompatibility, and osteoconductivity of a degradable magnesium (Mg) alloy make it a potential material for orthopedic implants. The main limitation of Mg is its high corrosion rate in the human body. Surface modification is necessary to improve the Mg corrosion resistance. In this work, a polymeric layer of gelatin/nanohydroxyapatite (Gel/nHA) was coated on a ZK60 Mg alloy by dip coating and spin coating to test the corrosion resistance and biocompatibility in vitro and in vivo. The results from the in vitro test revealed that the coated groups reduced the corrosion rate with the corrosion current density by 59 and 81%, from 31.22 to 12.83 μA/cm2 and 5.83 μA/cm2 in the spin coating and dip coating groups, respectively. The dip coating group showed better corrosion resistance than the spin coating group with the lowest released hydrogen content (17.5 mL) and lowest pH value (8.23) and reducing the current density by 45%. In vitro, the relative growth rate was over 75% in all groups tested with MG63, demonstrating that the Mg substrate and coating materials were within the safety range. The dip coating and spin coating groups enhanced the cell proliferation with significantly higher OD values (3.3, 3.0, and 2.5, respectively) and had better antihemolysis and antiplatelet adhesion abilities than the uncoated group. The two coating methods showed no difference in the cellular response, cell migration, hemolysis, and platelet adhesion test. In in vivo tests in rats, the dip coating group also showed a higher corrosion resistance with a lower corrosion rate and mass loss than the spin coating group. In addition, the blood biochemistry and histopathology results indicated that all materials used in this study were biocompatible with living subjects. The present research confirmed that the two methods have no noticeable difference in cell and organ response but the corrosion resistance of dip coating was higher than that of spin coating either in vitro or in vivo.
AbstractList Suitable biomechanical properties, good biocompatibility, and osteoconductivity of a degradable magnesium (Mg) alloy make it a potential material for orthopedic implants. The main limitation of Mg is its high corrosion rate in the human body. Surface modification is necessary to improve the Mg corrosion resistance. In this work, a polymeric layer of gelatin/nanohydroxyapatite (Gel/nHA) was coated on a ZK60 Mg alloy by dip coating and spin coating to test the corrosion resistance and biocompatibility in vitro and in vivo. The results from the in vitro test revealed that the coated groups reduced the corrosion rate with the corrosion current density by 59 and 81%, from 31.22 to 12.83 μA/cm2 and 5.83 μA/cm2 in the spin coating and dip coating groups, respectively. The dip coating group showed better corrosion resistance than the spin coating group with the lowest released hydrogen content (17.5 mL) and lowest pH value (8.23) and reducing the current density by 45%. In vitro, the relative growth rate was over 75% in all groups tested with MG63, demonstrating that the Mg substrate and coating materials were within the safety range. The dip coating and spin coating groups enhanced the cell proliferation with significantly higher OD values (3.3, 3.0, and 2.5, respectively) and had better antihemolysis and antiplatelet adhesion abilities than the uncoated group. The two coating methods showed no difference in the cellular response, cell migration, hemolysis, and platelet adhesion test. In in vivo tests in rats, the dip coating group also showed a higher corrosion resistance with a lower corrosion rate and mass loss than the spin coating group. In addition, the blood biochemistry and histopathology results indicated that all materials used in this study were biocompatible with living subjects. The present research confirmed that the two methods have no noticeable difference in cell and organ response but the corrosion resistance of dip coating was higher than that of spin coating either in vitro or in vivo.Suitable biomechanical properties, good biocompatibility, and osteoconductivity of a degradable magnesium (Mg) alloy make it a potential material for orthopedic implants. The main limitation of Mg is its high corrosion rate in the human body. Surface modification is necessary to improve the Mg corrosion resistance. In this work, a polymeric layer of gelatin/nanohydroxyapatite (Gel/nHA) was coated on a ZK60 Mg alloy by dip coating and spin coating to test the corrosion resistance and biocompatibility in vitro and in vivo. The results from the in vitro test revealed that the coated groups reduced the corrosion rate with the corrosion current density by 59 and 81%, from 31.22 to 12.83 μA/cm2 and 5.83 μA/cm2 in the spin coating and dip coating groups, respectively. The dip coating group showed better corrosion resistance than the spin coating group with the lowest released hydrogen content (17.5 mL) and lowest pH value (8.23) and reducing the current density by 45%. In vitro, the relative growth rate was over 75% in all groups tested with MG63, demonstrating that the Mg substrate and coating materials were within the safety range. The dip coating and spin coating groups enhanced the cell proliferation with significantly higher OD values (3.3, 3.0, and 2.5, respectively) and had better antihemolysis and antiplatelet adhesion abilities than the uncoated group. The two coating methods showed no difference in the cellular response, cell migration, hemolysis, and platelet adhesion test. In in vivo tests in rats, the dip coating group also showed a higher corrosion resistance with a lower corrosion rate and mass loss than the spin coating group. In addition, the blood biochemistry and histopathology results indicated that all materials used in this study were biocompatible with living subjects. The present research confirmed that the two methods have no noticeable difference in cell and organ response but the corrosion resistance of dip coating was higher than that of spin coating either in vitro or in vivo.
Suitable biomechanical properties, good biocompatibility, and osteoconductivity of a degradable magnesium (Mg) alloy make it a potential material for orthopedic implants. The main limitation of Mg is its high corrosion rate in the human body. Surface modification is necessary to improve the Mg corrosion resistance. In this work, a polymeric layer of gelatin/nanohydroxyapatite (Gel/nHA) was coated on a ZK60 Mg alloy by dip coating and spin coating to test the corrosion resistance and biocompatibility in vitro and in vivo. The results from the in vitro test revealed that the coated groups reduced the corrosion rate with the corrosion current density by 59 and 81%, from 31.22 to 12.83 μA/cm2 and 5.83 μA/cm2 in the spin coating and dip coating groups, respectively. The dip coating group showed better corrosion resistance than the spin coating group with the lowest released hydrogen content (17.5 mL) and lowest pH value (8.23) and reducing the current density by 45%. In vitro, the relative growth rate was over 75% in all groups tested with MG63, demonstrating that the Mg substrate and coating materials were within the safety range. The dip coating and spin coating groups enhanced the cell proliferation with significantly higher OD values (3.3, 3.0, and 2.5, respectively) and had better antihemolysis and antiplatelet adhesion abilities than the uncoated group. The two coating methods showed no difference in the cellular response, cell migration, hemolysis, and platelet adhesion test. In in vivo tests in rats, the dip coating group also showed a higher corrosion resistance with a lower corrosion rate and mass loss than the spin coating group. In addition, the blood biochemistry and histopathology results indicated that all materials used in this study were biocompatible with living subjects. The present research confirmed that the two methods have no noticeable difference in cell and organ response but the corrosion resistance of dip coating was higher than that of spin coating either in vitro or in vivo.
Suitable biomechanical properties, good biocompatibility, and osteoconductivity of a degradable magnesium (Mg) alloy make it a potential material for orthopedic implants. The main limitation of Mg is its high corrosion rate in the human body. Surface modification is necessary to improve the Mg corrosion resistance. In this work, a polymeric layer of gelatin/nanohydroxyapatite (Gel/nHA) was coated on a ZK60 Mg alloy by dip coating and spin coating to test the corrosion resistance and biocompatibility in vitro and in vivo. The results from the in vitro test revealed that the coated groups reduced the corrosion rate with the corrosion current density by 59 and 81%, from 31.22 to 12.83 μA/cm and 5.83 μA/cm in the spin coating and dip coating groups, respectively. The dip coating group showed better corrosion resistance than the spin coating group with the lowest released hydrogen content (17.5 mL) and lowest pH value (8.23) and reducing the current density by 45%. In vitro, the relative growth rate was over 75% in all groups tested with MG63, demonstrating that the Mg substrate and coating materials were within the safety range. The dip coating and spin coating groups enhanced the cell proliferation with significantly higher OD values (3.3, 3.0, and 2.5, respectively) and had better antihemolysis and antiplatelet adhesion abilities than the uncoated group. The two coating methods showed no difference in the cellular response, cell migration, hemolysis, and platelet adhesion test. In in vivo tests in rats, the dip coating group also showed a higher corrosion resistance with a lower corrosion rate and mass loss than the spin coating group. In addition, the blood biochemistry and histopathology results indicated that all materials used in this study were biocompatible with living subjects. The present research confirmed that the two methods have no noticeable difference in cell and organ response but the corrosion resistance of dip coating was higher than that of spin coating either in vitro or in vivo.
Author Chen, Fang-Hsu
Yeh, Ming-Long
Tran, Duong-Thuy
Wu, Guan-Lin
Ching, Paula Carmela O.
AuthorAffiliation Department of Biomedical Engineering
Medical Device Innovation Center
National Cheng Kung University
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: Department of Biomedical Engineering
– name: National Cheng Kung University
– name: Medical Device Innovation Center
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Duong-Thuy
  orcidid: 0000-0003-0163-9538
  surname: Tran
  fullname: Tran, Duong-Thuy
  organization: National Cheng Kung University
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Fang-Hsu
  surname: Chen
  fullname: Chen, Fang-Hsu
  organization: National Cheng Kung University
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Guan-Lin
  surname: Wu
  fullname: Wu, Guan-Lin
  organization: National Cheng Kung University
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Paula Carmela O.
  surname: Ching
  fullname: Ching, Paula Carmela O.
  organization: National Cheng Kung University
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Ming-Long
  orcidid: 0000-0001-6942-060X
  surname: Yeh
  fullname: Yeh, Ming-Long
  email: mlyeh@mail.ncku.edu.tw
  organization: National Cheng Kung University
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36695051$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNkU1PVDEYhRuDEUT-gnbpZqBf98vEBY4Ik2BYoG5vetu3UNLbXtteZf6Gv9gOMxLDRlftSZ_Ttz3nJdrzwQNCbyg5poTRE6nSYMMoM0QrXTpmilDK2DN0wHjDF13btHt_7ffRUUp3hBDK20oI8QLt87ruKlLRA_Rr5Y2bwSvAweDryXq8DDJbf4Ol1_ijnR71T5tv8Tm4jTq5WOsY7tdyKioDNiHiDzZESCEOcnCAP9_gU-fCGl_FfBsm0Fbh1Tg56XN6h1cef7M5hochD-JHwNd51hbSK_TclG_B0W49RF8_nX1ZXiwur85Xy9PLhWRtkxe61V3dKFqzulWKD7wRoiOdkbQ2nRkkYboaNGVV11HJa9aaamgGqonQLQAIfojebu-dYvg-Q8r9aJMCV54IYU49a0pIHROCFfT1Dp2HEXQ_RTvKuO7_5FiAZguoGFKKYB4RSvpNaf2T0vpdacX5_olT2VxCDT5Had1_-PnWX4D-LszRb07_5foNya63Zw
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmrt_2023_08_026
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amf_2025_200195
crossref_primary_10_1002_jbm_b_35545
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apsusc_2023_159137
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rineng_2024_101784
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_micron_2023_103548
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijbiomac_2024_131104
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmbbm_2024_106581
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surfcoat_2024_131203
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_colsurfb_2024_113880
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmrt_2023_09_215
crossref_primary_10_1002_jbm_a_37818
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tsf_2023_140082
crossref_primary_10_1002_pat_70145
crossref_primary_10_1088_2631_8695_ad48d8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_colsurfa_2024_133945
crossref_primary_10_3390_cmd6010009
crossref_primary_10_1002_adma_202416260
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.msec.2015.12.006
10.1016/j.matlet.2008.04.046
10.1038/srep10719
10.1002/jbm.a.34530
10.1002/jbm.a.35023
10.11900/0412.1961.2018.00032
10.1016/j.jot.2015.08.003
10.1016/j.corsci.2010.09.040
10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.05.046
10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00564
10.1016/j.msec.2013.08.025
10.3390/ma13061342
10.1016/j.actbio.2009.12.020
10.3390/nu13020509
10.1088/1748-605X/aaa9d5
10.1088/0957-4484/24/37/375103
10.1007/s00170-022-08770-8
10.1088/0957-4484/26/17/175102
10.3390/ma15165669
10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.10.017
10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01184
10.1016/j.corsci.2010.02.027
10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.125139
10.1097/01.mbc.0000469521.23628.2d
10.1007/s10856-015-5572-6
10.1016/j.jma.2021.08.017
10.1016/j.jma.2021.03.004
10.3390/ijms22158301
10.1007/s42247-019-00063-3
10.1016/j.msea.2006.12.020
10.1186/s12882-020-02144-6
10.1016/j.snb.2014.09.121
10.1016/b978-0-08-102572-7.00003-9
10.1007/s10934-009-9294-3
10.3103/s1067821218040077
10.1016/j.matlet.2020.127326
10.1002/jbm.a.36226
10.4018/978-1-5225-5445-5.ch001
10.1016/j.jma.2021.06.024
10.1016/j.actbio.2015.02.010
10.3390/ma13235538
10.3390/jfb8040044
10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.10.058
10.1002/advs.201902443
10.1007/s11998-020-00337-0
10.3390/ma10070696
10.1016/j.mser.2014.01.001
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.05.133
10.3389/fenrg.2021.683293
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2023 American Chemical Society
Copyright_xml – notice: 2023 American Chemical Society
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c01122
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic

MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Engineering
EISSN 2373-9878
EndPage 718
ExternalDocumentID 36695051
10_1021_acsbiomaterials_2c01122
c018443031
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GroupedDBID 53G
ABFRP
ABMVS
ABQRX
ABUCX
ACGFS
ACS
ADHLV
AEESW
AFEFF
AHGAQ
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AQSVZ
EBS
GGK
UI2
VF5
VG9
W1F
AAYXX
ABBLG
ABJNI
ABLBI
BAANH
CITATION
CUPRZ
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-a287t-d8d967c16268cc3b3744909fa16f9fba02d5bd125991a3628f5b7b1d04d8eee43
IEDL.DBID ACS
ISSN 2373-9878
IngestDate Thu Jul 10 17:37:00 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:25:08 EST 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:06:08 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:45:35 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 15 12:05:22 EST 2023
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords magnesium alloys
dip coating
in vitro
orthopedic implant
in vivo
corrosion resistance
spin coating
Language English
License https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-029
https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-037
https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-045
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-a287t-d8d967c16268cc3b3744909fa16f9fba02d5bd125991a3628f5b7b1d04d8eee43
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0001-6942-060X
0000-0003-0163-9538
PMID 36695051
PQID 2769592442
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 14
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2769592442
pubmed_primary_36695051
crossref_primary_10_1021_acsbiomaterials_2c01122
crossref_citationtrail_10_1021_acsbiomaterials_2c01122
acs_journals_10_1021_acsbiomaterials_2c01122
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2023-02-13
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-02-13
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2023
  text: 2023-02-13
  day: 13
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle ACS biomaterials science & engineering
PublicationTitleAlternate ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng
PublicationYear 2023
Publisher American Chemical Society
Publisher_xml – name: American Chemical Society
References ref9/cit9
ref45/cit45
ref3/cit3
ref27/cit27
ref16/cit16
ref23/cit23
ref8/cit8
ref31/cit31
ref2/cit2
ref34/cit34
ref37/cit37
ref20/cit20
ref48/cit48
ref17/cit17
ref10/cit10
ref35/cit35
ref19/cit19
ref21/cit21
ref42/cit42
ref46/cit46
ref49/cit49
ref13/cit13
ref24/cit24
ref38/cit38
van Stam J. (ref15/cit15) 2016
ref50/cit50
ref6/cit6
ref36/cit36
ref18/cit18
ref11/cit11
ref25/cit25
ref29/cit29
ref32/cit32
ref39/cit39
ref14/cit14
ref5/cit5
ref51/cit51
ref43/cit43
ref28/cit28
ref40/cit40
ref26/cit26
ref12/cit12
ref41/cit41
ref22/cit22
ref33/cit33
ref4/cit4
ref30/cit30
ref47/cit47
ref1/cit1
ref44/cit44
ref7/cit7
References_xml – ident: ref34/cit34
  doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.12.006
– ident: ref42/cit42
  doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2008.04.046
– ident: ref29/cit29
  doi: 10.1038/srep10719
– ident: ref11/cit11
  doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.34530
– ident: ref48/cit48
  doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35023
– ident: ref9/cit9
  doi: 10.11900/0412.1961.2018.00032
– ident: ref30/cit30
  doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2015.08.003
– ident: ref24/cit24
  doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2010.09.040
– ident: ref41/cit41
  doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.05.046
– ident: ref21/cit21
  doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00564
– ident: ref46/cit46
  doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2013.08.025
– ident: ref38/cit38
  doi: 10.3390/ma13061342
– ident: ref20/cit20
  doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.12.020
– ident: ref6/cit6
  doi: 10.3390/nu13020509
– ident: ref33/cit33
  doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/aaa9d5
– ident: ref25/cit25
  doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/24/37/375103
– ident: ref1/cit1
  doi: 10.1007/s00170-022-08770-8
– ident: ref36/cit36
  doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/26/17/175102
– ident: ref2/cit2
  doi: 10.3390/ma15165669
– ident: ref10/cit10
  doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.10.017
– ident: ref13/cit13
  doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01184
– start-page: 15
  volume-title: Organic Photovoltaics XVII
  year: 2016
  ident: ref15/cit15
– ident: ref14/cit14
  doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2010.02.027
– ident: ref44/cit44
  doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.125139
– ident: ref47/cit47
  doi: 10.1097/01.mbc.0000469521.23628.2d
– ident: ref22/cit22
  doi: 10.1007/s10856-015-5572-6
– ident: ref5/cit5
  doi: 10.1016/j.jma.2021.08.017
– ident: ref7/cit7
  doi: 10.1016/j.jma.2021.03.004
– ident: ref27/cit27
  doi: 10.3390/ijms22158301
– ident: ref19/cit19
  doi: 10.1007/s42247-019-00063-3
– ident: ref31/cit31
  doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2006.12.020
– ident: ref49/cit49
  doi: 10.1186/s12882-020-02144-6
– ident: ref32/cit32
– ident: ref35/cit35
  doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2014.09.121
– ident: ref37/cit37
  doi: 10.1016/b978-0-08-102572-7.00003-9
– ident: ref23/cit23
  doi: 10.1007/s10934-009-9294-3
– ident: ref16/cit16
  doi: 10.3103/s1067821218040077
– ident: ref17/cit17
  doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2020.127326
– ident: ref18/cit18
  doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.36226
– ident: ref51/cit51
  doi: 10.4018/978-1-5225-5445-5.ch001
– ident: ref4/cit4
  doi: 10.1016/j.jma.2021.06.024
– ident: ref45/cit45
  doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.02.010
– ident: ref12/cit12
  doi: 10.3390/ma13235538
– ident: ref3/cit3
  doi: 10.3390/jfb8040044
– ident: ref43/cit43
  doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.10.058
– ident: ref8/cit8
  doi: 10.1002/advs.201902443
– ident: ref39/cit39
  doi: 10.1007/s11998-020-00337-0
– ident: ref26/cit26
  doi: 10.3390/ma10070696
– ident: ref50/cit50
  doi: 10.1016/j.mser.2014.01.001
– ident: ref28/cit28
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.05.133
– ident: ref40/cit40
  doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2021.683293
SSID ssj0001385444
Score 2.3695421
Snippet Suitable biomechanical properties, good biocompatibility, and osteoconductivity of a degradable magnesium (Mg) alloy make it a potential material for...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
acs
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 705
SubjectTerms Absorbable Implants
Alloys - chemistry
Alloys - pharmacology
Animals
Bio-interactions and Biocompatibility
Coated Materials, Biocompatible - chemistry
Coated Materials, Biocompatible - pharmacology
Durapatite - chemistry
Durapatite - pharmacology
Gelatin - pharmacology
Humans
Magnesium - chemistry
Magnesium - pharmacology
Rats
Surface Properties
Title Influence of Spin Coating and Dip Coating with Gelatin/Hydroxyapatite for Bioresorbable Mg Alloy Orthopedic Implants: In Vitro and In Vivo Studies
URI http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c01122
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36695051
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2769592442
Volume 9
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVABC
  databaseName: American Chemical Society Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2373-9878
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0001385444
  issn: 2373-9878
  databaseCode: ACS
  dateStart: 20150112
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://pubs.acs.org/action/showPublications?display=journals
  providerName: American Chemical Society
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Lb9QwELaqcoEDhfJqC8hIHMk2fsRxuC0L7RapIFGKeov8pKuu4tVutlL5Gf3FHeexvLQqHCPZTmyPM994vplB6LXIFDVKk8RQJaOBQhLpBU2YoanWzHDhY4Dz8ScxPuUfz7KzDUTWePAp2VdmESPRVd3uyIAaEEkKf907VEgS7a3h6OTntQqTGW9KuFKWswQsatmzutaPFTWTWfyumdbAzUbtHGyhL33wTss2uRgsaz0wP_7O5fjvM3qA7ncgFA9bqXmINly1je79kprwEbo-6quX4ODxyWxS4VFQkSONVWXx-8ls9RyvcvFhQ6qr9sdXNn6qikTt2mGAxPjdJIBNH-Y6Rmnh4-94OJ2GK_x5Xp-HWfQT4ZiiOPJx3uKjCn-b1PPQvKR5uAy44zo-RqcHH76OxklXvyFRYIfViZW2ELkhYDNJY5hmOedFWnhFhC-8Vim1mbaAsACjKlCk0mc618Sm3ErnHGdP0GYVKvcMYaodANfce5tarotUC1Fwx2XmhTHGkR30Bla17M7fomxc65SUfyx12S31DhL9Vpemy4UeS3JMb--YrjrO2nQgt3d51ctSCUc3-mNU5cISGuSiyMD-5dDmaStkq0EZTBDAKdn9v4ntobsUUFiklRP2HG3W86V7Aaip1i-bc3IDdLcYDw
linkProvider American Chemical Society
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LbxMxELaqcgAOvB_laSSObLp-rNfLrQRKAk05tEXltPKTRo3WUbJBKj-DX8zY2aRQqarguCvb68d45xv7mxmEXotCUaM0yQxVMhooJJNe0IwZmmvNDBc-OjiP9sXgiH86Lo43kFz5wkAn5tDSPF3in0cXINvwLjqkq3a5MD1qQDIp_HyvpXgoERT1D85PV5gseMrkSlnJMjCs5YrcdXlbUUGZ-d8K6hLUmbTP7m30bd3vRDo57S1a3TM_L4R0_J-B3UG3OkiKd5YydBdtuOYeuvlHoML76NdwlcsEB48PpuMG94OKjGmsGovfj6fr53iwiz8mil2zPTizsccq0rZbhwEg43fjABZ-mOnos4VH3_HOZBLO8JdZexKm8dYIx4DFkZ3zFg8b_HXczkL6SHr4EXDHfHyAjnY_HPYHWZfNIVNglbWZlbYSpSFgQUljmGYl51VeeUWEr7xWObWFtoC3ALEqUKvSF7rUxObcSuccZw_RZhMa9xhhqh3A2NJ7m1uuq1wLUXHHZeGFMcaRLfQGZrXuduO8ThftlNQXprrupnoLidWK16aLjB4TdEyurpivK06XwUGurvJqJVI1bOR4O6MaFxZQoBRVAdYwhzKPlrK2bpTBAAGqkif_NrCX6PrgcLRX7w33Pz9FNyjgs0g4J-wZ2mxnC_cc8FSrX6St8xvb4yB6
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Zb9QwELaqIiF44D7KaSQeyTY-4iSIl7Jl2QVakEpRX1Dks12xiqPdLFL5Gfxixt5kgUpVBY-JbMfHTOYbz4XQc5FJqqUiiaayCAoKSQonaMI0TZVimgsXApz39sX4kL87yo420Ks-FgYmsYCRFtGIH7i6Ma7LMEC24X0ISpft6nAGVAN1UvgBX8pCIrgAjIYHv29YWJHxWM2VspwloFwXvYPX-WMFIaUXfwupc5BnlECj6-jreu7R8eTbYNmqgf5xJq3j_y7uBrrWQVO8s6Klm2jD1rfQ1T8SFt5GPyd9TRPsHT5opjUeehk8p7GsDd6dNuvncMGL30ZXu3p7fGrCrGVw324tBqCMX089aPp-rkLsFt47xjuzmT_FH-ftiW-C9QiHxMXBS-clntT4y7Sd-_iR-PDd484D8g46HL35PBwnXVWHRIJ21iamMKXINQFNqtCaKZZzXqalk0S40imZUpMpA7gLkKsE8Vq4TOWKmJSbwlrL2V20Wfva3keYKgtwNnfOpIarMlVClNzyInNCa23JFnoBu1p1XLmoosGdkurMVlfdVm8h0Z96pbsM6aFQx-zijum6Y7NKEnJxl2c9WVXA0MFKI2vrl9AgF2UGWjGHNvdW9LYelMECAbKSB_-2sKfo8qfdUfVhsv_-IbpCAaYFv3PCHqHNdr60jwFWtepJ5J5f0xwi9A
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence+of+Spin+Coating+and+Dip+Coating+with+Gelatin%2FHydroxyapatite+for+Bioresorbable+Mg+Alloy+Orthopedic+Implants%3A+In+Vitro+and+In+Vivo+Studies&rft.jtitle=ACS+biomaterials+science+%26+engineering&rft.au=Tran%2C+Duong-Thuy&rft.au=Chen%2C+Fang-Hsu&rft.au=Wu%2C+Guan-Lin&rft.au=Ching%2C+Paula+Carmela+O&rft.date=2023-02-13&rft.issn=2373-9878&rft.eissn=2373-9878&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=705&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021%2Facsbiomaterials.2c01122&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2373-9878&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2373-9878&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2373-9878&client=summon