Influence of Spin Coating and Dip Coating with Gelatin/Hydroxyapatite for Bioresorbable Mg Alloy Orthopedic Implants: In Vitro and In Vivo Studies
Suitable biomechanical properties, good biocompatibility, and osteoconductivity of a degradable magnesium (Mg) alloy make it a potential material for orthopedic implants. The main limitation of Mg is its high corrosion rate in the human body. Surface modification is necessary to improve the Mg corro...
Saved in:
Published in | ACS biomaterials science & engineering Vol. 9; no. 2; pp. 705 - 718 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
American Chemical Society
13.02.2023
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 2373-9878 2373-9878 |
DOI | 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c01122 |
Cover
Abstract | Suitable biomechanical properties, good biocompatibility, and osteoconductivity of a degradable magnesium (Mg) alloy make it a potential material for orthopedic implants. The main limitation of Mg is its high corrosion rate in the human body. Surface modification is necessary to improve the Mg corrosion resistance. In this work, a polymeric layer of gelatin/nanohydroxyapatite (Gel/nHA) was coated on a ZK60 Mg alloy by dip coating and spin coating to test the corrosion resistance and biocompatibility in vitro and in vivo. The results from the in vitro test revealed that the coated groups reduced the corrosion rate with the corrosion current density by 59 and 81%, from 31.22 to 12.83 μA/cm2 and 5.83 μA/cm2 in the spin coating and dip coating groups, respectively. The dip coating group showed better corrosion resistance than the spin coating group with the lowest released hydrogen content (17.5 mL) and lowest pH value (8.23) and reducing the current density by 45%. In vitro, the relative growth rate was over 75% in all groups tested with MG63, demonstrating that the Mg substrate and coating materials were within the safety range. The dip coating and spin coating groups enhanced the cell proliferation with significantly higher OD values (3.3, 3.0, and 2.5, respectively) and had better antihemolysis and antiplatelet adhesion abilities than the uncoated group. The two coating methods showed no difference in the cellular response, cell migration, hemolysis, and platelet adhesion test. In in vivo tests in rats, the dip coating group also showed a higher corrosion resistance with a lower corrosion rate and mass loss than the spin coating group. In addition, the blood biochemistry and histopathology results indicated that all materials used in this study were biocompatible with living subjects. The present research confirmed that the two methods have no noticeable difference in cell and organ response but the corrosion resistance of dip coating was higher than that of spin coating either in vitro or in vivo. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Suitable biomechanical properties, good biocompatibility, and osteoconductivity of a degradable magnesium (Mg) alloy make it a potential material for orthopedic implants. The main limitation of Mg is its high corrosion rate in the human body. Surface modification is necessary to improve the Mg corrosion resistance. In this work, a polymeric layer of gelatin/nanohydroxyapatite (Gel/nHA) was coated on a ZK60 Mg alloy by dip coating and spin coating to test the corrosion resistance and biocompatibility in vitro and in vivo. The results from the in vitro test revealed that the coated groups reduced the corrosion rate with the corrosion current density by 59 and 81%, from 31.22 to 12.83 μA/cm2 and 5.83 μA/cm2 in the spin coating and dip coating groups, respectively. The dip coating group showed better corrosion resistance than the spin coating group with the lowest released hydrogen content (17.5 mL) and lowest pH value (8.23) and reducing the current density by 45%. In vitro, the relative growth rate was over 75% in all groups tested with MG63, demonstrating that the Mg substrate and coating materials were within the safety range. The dip coating and spin coating groups enhanced the cell proliferation with significantly higher OD values (3.3, 3.0, and 2.5, respectively) and had better antihemolysis and antiplatelet adhesion abilities than the uncoated group. The two coating methods showed no difference in the cellular response, cell migration, hemolysis, and platelet adhesion test. In in vivo tests in rats, the dip coating group also showed a higher corrosion resistance with a lower corrosion rate and mass loss than the spin coating group. In addition, the blood biochemistry and histopathology results indicated that all materials used in this study were biocompatible with living subjects. The present research confirmed that the two methods have no noticeable difference in cell and organ response but the corrosion resistance of dip coating was higher than that of spin coating either in vitro or in vivo.Suitable biomechanical properties, good biocompatibility, and osteoconductivity of a degradable magnesium (Mg) alloy make it a potential material for orthopedic implants. The main limitation of Mg is its high corrosion rate in the human body. Surface modification is necessary to improve the Mg corrosion resistance. In this work, a polymeric layer of gelatin/nanohydroxyapatite (Gel/nHA) was coated on a ZK60 Mg alloy by dip coating and spin coating to test the corrosion resistance and biocompatibility in vitro and in vivo. The results from the in vitro test revealed that the coated groups reduced the corrosion rate with the corrosion current density by 59 and 81%, from 31.22 to 12.83 μA/cm2 and 5.83 μA/cm2 in the spin coating and dip coating groups, respectively. The dip coating group showed better corrosion resistance than the spin coating group with the lowest released hydrogen content (17.5 mL) and lowest pH value (8.23) and reducing the current density by 45%. In vitro, the relative growth rate was over 75% in all groups tested with MG63, demonstrating that the Mg substrate and coating materials were within the safety range. The dip coating and spin coating groups enhanced the cell proliferation with significantly higher OD values (3.3, 3.0, and 2.5, respectively) and had better antihemolysis and antiplatelet adhesion abilities than the uncoated group. The two coating methods showed no difference in the cellular response, cell migration, hemolysis, and platelet adhesion test. In in vivo tests in rats, the dip coating group also showed a higher corrosion resistance with a lower corrosion rate and mass loss than the spin coating group. In addition, the blood biochemistry and histopathology results indicated that all materials used in this study were biocompatible with living subjects. The present research confirmed that the two methods have no noticeable difference in cell and organ response but the corrosion resistance of dip coating was higher than that of spin coating either in vitro or in vivo. Suitable biomechanical properties, good biocompatibility, and osteoconductivity of a degradable magnesium (Mg) alloy make it a potential material for orthopedic implants. The main limitation of Mg is its high corrosion rate in the human body. Surface modification is necessary to improve the Mg corrosion resistance. In this work, a polymeric layer of gelatin/nanohydroxyapatite (Gel/nHA) was coated on a ZK60 Mg alloy by dip coating and spin coating to test the corrosion resistance and biocompatibility in vitro and in vivo. The results from the in vitro test revealed that the coated groups reduced the corrosion rate with the corrosion current density by 59 and 81%, from 31.22 to 12.83 μA/cm2 and 5.83 μA/cm2 in the spin coating and dip coating groups, respectively. The dip coating group showed better corrosion resistance than the spin coating group with the lowest released hydrogen content (17.5 mL) and lowest pH value (8.23) and reducing the current density by 45%. In vitro, the relative growth rate was over 75% in all groups tested with MG63, demonstrating that the Mg substrate and coating materials were within the safety range. The dip coating and spin coating groups enhanced the cell proliferation with significantly higher OD values (3.3, 3.0, and 2.5, respectively) and had better antihemolysis and antiplatelet adhesion abilities than the uncoated group. The two coating methods showed no difference in the cellular response, cell migration, hemolysis, and platelet adhesion test. In in vivo tests in rats, the dip coating group also showed a higher corrosion resistance with a lower corrosion rate and mass loss than the spin coating group. In addition, the blood biochemistry and histopathology results indicated that all materials used in this study were biocompatible with living subjects. The present research confirmed that the two methods have no noticeable difference in cell and organ response but the corrosion resistance of dip coating was higher than that of spin coating either in vitro or in vivo. Suitable biomechanical properties, good biocompatibility, and osteoconductivity of a degradable magnesium (Mg) alloy make it a potential material for orthopedic implants. The main limitation of Mg is its high corrosion rate in the human body. Surface modification is necessary to improve the Mg corrosion resistance. In this work, a polymeric layer of gelatin/nanohydroxyapatite (Gel/nHA) was coated on a ZK60 Mg alloy by dip coating and spin coating to test the corrosion resistance and biocompatibility in vitro and in vivo. The results from the in vitro test revealed that the coated groups reduced the corrosion rate with the corrosion current density by 59 and 81%, from 31.22 to 12.83 μA/cm and 5.83 μA/cm in the spin coating and dip coating groups, respectively. The dip coating group showed better corrosion resistance than the spin coating group with the lowest released hydrogen content (17.5 mL) and lowest pH value (8.23) and reducing the current density by 45%. In vitro, the relative growth rate was over 75% in all groups tested with MG63, demonstrating that the Mg substrate and coating materials were within the safety range. The dip coating and spin coating groups enhanced the cell proliferation with significantly higher OD values (3.3, 3.0, and 2.5, respectively) and had better antihemolysis and antiplatelet adhesion abilities than the uncoated group. The two coating methods showed no difference in the cellular response, cell migration, hemolysis, and platelet adhesion test. In in vivo tests in rats, the dip coating group also showed a higher corrosion resistance with a lower corrosion rate and mass loss than the spin coating group. In addition, the blood biochemistry and histopathology results indicated that all materials used in this study were biocompatible with living subjects. The present research confirmed that the two methods have no noticeable difference in cell and organ response but the corrosion resistance of dip coating was higher than that of spin coating either in vitro or in vivo. |
Author | Chen, Fang-Hsu Yeh, Ming-Long Tran, Duong-Thuy Wu, Guan-Lin Ching, Paula Carmela O. |
AuthorAffiliation | Department of Biomedical Engineering Medical Device Innovation Center National Cheng Kung University |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: Department of Biomedical Engineering – name: National Cheng Kung University – name: Medical Device Innovation Center |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Duong-Thuy orcidid: 0000-0003-0163-9538 surname: Tran fullname: Tran, Duong-Thuy organization: National Cheng Kung University – sequence: 2 givenname: Fang-Hsu surname: Chen fullname: Chen, Fang-Hsu organization: National Cheng Kung University – sequence: 3 givenname: Guan-Lin surname: Wu fullname: Wu, Guan-Lin organization: National Cheng Kung University – sequence: 4 givenname: Paula Carmela O. surname: Ching fullname: Ching, Paula Carmela O. organization: National Cheng Kung University – sequence: 5 givenname: Ming-Long orcidid: 0000-0001-6942-060X surname: Yeh fullname: Yeh, Ming-Long email: mlyeh@mail.ncku.edu.tw organization: National Cheng Kung University |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36695051$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqNkU1PVDEYhRuDEUT-gnbpZqBf98vEBY4Ik2BYoG5vetu3UNLbXtteZf6Gv9gOMxLDRlftSZ_Ttz3nJdrzwQNCbyg5poTRE6nSYMMoM0QrXTpmilDK2DN0wHjDF13btHt_7ffRUUp3hBDK20oI8QLt87ruKlLRA_Rr5Y2bwSvAweDryXq8DDJbf4Ol1_ijnR71T5tv8Tm4jTq5WOsY7tdyKioDNiHiDzZESCEOcnCAP9_gU-fCGl_FfBsm0Fbh1Tg56XN6h1cef7M5hochD-JHwNd51hbSK_TclG_B0W49RF8_nX1ZXiwur85Xy9PLhWRtkxe61V3dKFqzulWKD7wRoiOdkbQ2nRkkYboaNGVV11HJa9aaamgGqonQLQAIfojebu-dYvg-Q8r9aJMCV54IYU49a0pIHROCFfT1Dp2HEXQ_RTvKuO7_5FiAZguoGFKKYB4RSvpNaf2T0vpdacX5_olT2VxCDT5Had1_-PnWX4D-LszRb07_5foNya63Zw |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmrt_2023_08_026 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amf_2025_200195 crossref_primary_10_1002_jbm_b_35545 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apsusc_2023_159137 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rineng_2024_101784 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_micron_2023_103548 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijbiomac_2024_131104 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmbbm_2024_106581 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surfcoat_2024_131203 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_colsurfb_2024_113880 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmrt_2023_09_215 crossref_primary_10_1002_jbm_a_37818 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tsf_2023_140082 crossref_primary_10_1002_pat_70145 crossref_primary_10_1088_2631_8695_ad48d8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_colsurfa_2024_133945 crossref_primary_10_3390_cmd6010009 crossref_primary_10_1002_adma_202416260 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.msec.2015.12.006 10.1016/j.matlet.2008.04.046 10.1038/srep10719 10.1002/jbm.a.34530 10.1002/jbm.a.35023 10.11900/0412.1961.2018.00032 10.1016/j.jot.2015.08.003 10.1016/j.corsci.2010.09.040 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.05.046 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00564 10.1016/j.msec.2013.08.025 10.3390/ma13061342 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.12.020 10.3390/nu13020509 10.1088/1748-605X/aaa9d5 10.1088/0957-4484/24/37/375103 10.1007/s00170-022-08770-8 10.1088/0957-4484/26/17/175102 10.3390/ma15165669 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.10.017 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01184 10.1016/j.corsci.2010.02.027 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.125139 10.1097/01.mbc.0000469521.23628.2d 10.1007/s10856-015-5572-6 10.1016/j.jma.2021.08.017 10.1016/j.jma.2021.03.004 10.3390/ijms22158301 10.1007/s42247-019-00063-3 10.1016/j.msea.2006.12.020 10.1186/s12882-020-02144-6 10.1016/j.snb.2014.09.121 10.1016/b978-0-08-102572-7.00003-9 10.1007/s10934-009-9294-3 10.3103/s1067821218040077 10.1016/j.matlet.2020.127326 10.1002/jbm.a.36226 10.4018/978-1-5225-5445-5.ch001 10.1016/j.jma.2021.06.024 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.02.010 10.3390/ma13235538 10.3390/jfb8040044 10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.10.058 10.1002/advs.201902443 10.1007/s11998-020-00337-0 10.3390/ma10070696 10.1016/j.mser.2014.01.001 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.05.133 10.3389/fenrg.2021.683293 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2023 American Chemical Society |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2023 American Chemical Society |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c01122 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Engineering |
EISSN | 2373-9878 |
EndPage | 718 |
ExternalDocumentID | 36695051 10_1021_acsbiomaterials_2c01122 c018443031 |
Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | 53G ABFRP ABMVS ABQRX ABUCX ACGFS ACS ADHLV AEESW AFEFF AHGAQ ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AQSVZ EBS GGK UI2 VF5 VG9 W1F AAYXX ABBLG ABJNI ABLBI BAANH CITATION CUPRZ CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-a287t-d8d967c16268cc3b3744909fa16f9fba02d5bd125991a3628f5b7b1d04d8eee43 |
IEDL.DBID | ACS |
ISSN | 2373-9878 |
IngestDate | Thu Jul 10 17:37:00 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:25:08 EST 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:06:08 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 00:45:35 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 15 12:05:22 EST 2023 |
IsPeerReviewed | false |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Keywords | magnesium alloys dip coating in vitro orthopedic implant in vivo corrosion resistance spin coating |
Language | English |
License | https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-045 |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-a287t-d8d967c16268cc3b3744909fa16f9fba02d5bd125991a3628f5b7b1d04d8eee43 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0001-6942-060X 0000-0003-0163-9538 |
PMID | 36695051 |
PQID | 2769592442 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 14 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2769592442 pubmed_primary_36695051 crossref_primary_10_1021_acsbiomaterials_2c01122 crossref_citationtrail_10_1021_acsbiomaterials_2c01122 acs_journals_10_1021_acsbiomaterials_2c01122 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2023-02-13 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2023-02-13 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2023 text: 2023-02-13 day: 13 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | ACS biomaterials science & engineering |
PublicationTitleAlternate | ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng |
PublicationYear | 2023 |
Publisher | American Chemical Society |
Publisher_xml | – name: American Chemical Society |
References | ref9/cit9 ref45/cit45 ref3/cit3 ref27/cit27 ref16/cit16 ref23/cit23 ref8/cit8 ref31/cit31 ref2/cit2 ref34/cit34 ref37/cit37 ref20/cit20 ref48/cit48 ref17/cit17 ref10/cit10 ref35/cit35 ref19/cit19 ref21/cit21 ref42/cit42 ref46/cit46 ref49/cit49 ref13/cit13 ref24/cit24 ref38/cit38 van Stam J. (ref15/cit15) 2016 ref50/cit50 ref6/cit6 ref36/cit36 ref18/cit18 ref11/cit11 ref25/cit25 ref29/cit29 ref32/cit32 ref39/cit39 ref14/cit14 ref5/cit5 ref51/cit51 ref43/cit43 ref28/cit28 ref40/cit40 ref26/cit26 ref12/cit12 ref41/cit41 ref22/cit22 ref33/cit33 ref4/cit4 ref30/cit30 ref47/cit47 ref1/cit1 ref44/cit44 ref7/cit7 |
References_xml | – ident: ref34/cit34 doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.12.006 – ident: ref42/cit42 doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2008.04.046 – ident: ref29/cit29 doi: 10.1038/srep10719 – ident: ref11/cit11 doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.34530 – ident: ref48/cit48 doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35023 – ident: ref9/cit9 doi: 10.11900/0412.1961.2018.00032 – ident: ref30/cit30 doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2015.08.003 – ident: ref24/cit24 doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2010.09.040 – ident: ref41/cit41 doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.05.046 – ident: ref21/cit21 doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00564 – ident: ref46/cit46 doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2013.08.025 – ident: ref38/cit38 doi: 10.3390/ma13061342 – ident: ref20/cit20 doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.12.020 – ident: ref6/cit6 doi: 10.3390/nu13020509 – ident: ref33/cit33 doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/aaa9d5 – ident: ref25/cit25 doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/24/37/375103 – ident: ref1/cit1 doi: 10.1007/s00170-022-08770-8 – ident: ref36/cit36 doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/26/17/175102 – ident: ref2/cit2 doi: 10.3390/ma15165669 – ident: ref10/cit10 doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.10.017 – ident: ref13/cit13 doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01184 – start-page: 15 volume-title: Organic Photovoltaics XVII year: 2016 ident: ref15/cit15 – ident: ref14/cit14 doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2010.02.027 – ident: ref44/cit44 doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.125139 – ident: ref47/cit47 doi: 10.1097/01.mbc.0000469521.23628.2d – ident: ref22/cit22 doi: 10.1007/s10856-015-5572-6 – ident: ref5/cit5 doi: 10.1016/j.jma.2021.08.017 – ident: ref7/cit7 doi: 10.1016/j.jma.2021.03.004 – ident: ref27/cit27 doi: 10.3390/ijms22158301 – ident: ref19/cit19 doi: 10.1007/s42247-019-00063-3 – ident: ref31/cit31 doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2006.12.020 – ident: ref49/cit49 doi: 10.1186/s12882-020-02144-6 – ident: ref32/cit32 – ident: ref35/cit35 doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2014.09.121 – ident: ref37/cit37 doi: 10.1016/b978-0-08-102572-7.00003-9 – ident: ref23/cit23 doi: 10.1007/s10934-009-9294-3 – ident: ref16/cit16 doi: 10.3103/s1067821218040077 – ident: ref17/cit17 doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2020.127326 – ident: ref18/cit18 doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.36226 – ident: ref51/cit51 doi: 10.4018/978-1-5225-5445-5.ch001 – ident: ref4/cit4 doi: 10.1016/j.jma.2021.06.024 – ident: ref45/cit45 doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.02.010 – ident: ref12/cit12 doi: 10.3390/ma13235538 – ident: ref3/cit3 doi: 10.3390/jfb8040044 – ident: ref43/cit43 doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.10.058 – ident: ref8/cit8 doi: 10.1002/advs.201902443 – ident: ref39/cit39 doi: 10.1007/s11998-020-00337-0 – ident: ref26/cit26 doi: 10.3390/ma10070696 – ident: ref50/cit50 doi: 10.1016/j.mser.2014.01.001 – ident: ref28/cit28 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.05.133 – ident: ref40/cit40 doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2021.683293 |
SSID | ssj0001385444 |
Score | 2.3695421 |
Snippet | Suitable biomechanical properties, good biocompatibility, and osteoconductivity of a degradable magnesium (Mg) alloy make it a potential material for... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref acs |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 705 |
SubjectTerms | Absorbable Implants Alloys - chemistry Alloys - pharmacology Animals Bio-interactions and Biocompatibility Coated Materials, Biocompatible - chemistry Coated Materials, Biocompatible - pharmacology Durapatite - chemistry Durapatite - pharmacology Gelatin - pharmacology Humans Magnesium - chemistry Magnesium - pharmacology Rats Surface Properties |
Title | Influence of Spin Coating and Dip Coating with Gelatin/Hydroxyapatite for Bioresorbable Mg Alloy Orthopedic Implants: In Vitro and In Vivo Studies |
URI | http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c01122 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36695051 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2769592442 |
Volume | 9 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVABC databaseName: American Chemical Society Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 2373-9878 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0001385444 issn: 2373-9878 databaseCode: ACS dateStart: 20150112 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://pubs.acs.org/action/showPublications?display=journals providerName: American Chemical Society |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Lb9QwELaqcoEDhfJqC8hIHMk2fsRxuC0L7RapIFGKeov8pKuu4tVutlL5Gf3FHeexvLQqHCPZTmyPM994vplB6LXIFDVKk8RQJaOBQhLpBU2YoanWzHDhY4Dz8ScxPuUfz7KzDUTWePAp2VdmESPRVd3uyIAaEEkKf907VEgS7a3h6OTntQqTGW9KuFKWswQsatmzutaPFTWTWfyumdbAzUbtHGyhL33wTss2uRgsaz0wP_7O5fjvM3qA7ncgFA9bqXmINly1je79kprwEbo-6quX4ODxyWxS4VFQkSONVWXx-8ls9RyvcvFhQ6qr9sdXNn6qikTt2mGAxPjdJIBNH-Y6Rmnh4-94OJ2GK_x5Xp-HWfQT4ZiiOPJx3uKjCn-b1PPQvKR5uAy44zo-RqcHH76OxklXvyFRYIfViZW2ELkhYDNJY5hmOedFWnhFhC-8Vim1mbaAsACjKlCk0mc618Sm3ErnHGdP0GYVKvcMYaodANfce5tarotUC1Fwx2XmhTHGkR30Bla17M7fomxc65SUfyx12S31DhL9Vpemy4UeS3JMb--YrjrO2nQgt3d51ctSCUc3-mNU5cISGuSiyMD-5dDmaStkq0EZTBDAKdn9v4ntobsUUFiklRP2HG3W86V7Aaip1i-bc3IDdLcYDw |
linkProvider | American Chemical Society |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LbxMxELaqcgAOvB_laSSObLp-rNfLrQRKAk05tEXltPKTRo3WUbJBKj-DX8zY2aRQqarguCvb68d45xv7mxmEXotCUaM0yQxVMhooJJNe0IwZmmvNDBc-OjiP9sXgiH86Lo43kFz5wkAn5tDSPF3in0cXINvwLjqkq3a5MD1qQDIp_HyvpXgoERT1D85PV5gseMrkSlnJMjCs5YrcdXlbUUGZ-d8K6hLUmbTP7m30bd3vRDo57S1a3TM_L4R0_J-B3UG3OkiKd5YydBdtuOYeuvlHoML76NdwlcsEB48PpuMG94OKjGmsGovfj6fr53iwiz8mil2zPTizsccq0rZbhwEg43fjABZ-mOnos4VH3_HOZBLO8JdZexKm8dYIx4DFkZ3zFg8b_HXczkL6SHr4EXDHfHyAjnY_HPYHWZfNIVNglbWZlbYSpSFgQUljmGYl51VeeUWEr7xWObWFtoC3ALEqUKvSF7rUxObcSuccZw_RZhMa9xhhqh3A2NJ7m1uuq1wLUXHHZeGFMcaRLfQGZrXuduO8ThftlNQXprrupnoLidWK16aLjB4TdEyurpivK06XwUGurvJqJVI1bOR4O6MaFxZQoBRVAdYwhzKPlrK2bpTBAAGqkif_NrCX6PrgcLRX7w33Pz9FNyjgs0g4J-wZ2mxnC_cc8FSrX6St8xvb4yB6 |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Zb9QwELaqIiF44D7KaSQeyTY-4iSIl7Jl2QVakEpRX1Dks12xiqPdLFL5Gfxixt5kgUpVBY-JbMfHTOYbz4XQc5FJqqUiiaayCAoKSQonaMI0TZVimgsXApz39sX4kL87yo420Ks-FgYmsYCRFtGIH7i6Ma7LMEC24X0ISpft6nAGVAN1UvgBX8pCIrgAjIYHv29YWJHxWM2VspwloFwXvYPX-WMFIaUXfwupc5BnlECj6-jreu7R8eTbYNmqgf5xJq3j_y7uBrrWQVO8s6Klm2jD1rfQ1T8SFt5GPyd9TRPsHT5opjUeehk8p7GsDd6dNuvncMGL30ZXu3p7fGrCrGVw324tBqCMX089aPp-rkLsFt47xjuzmT_FH-ftiW-C9QiHxMXBS-clntT4y7Sd-_iR-PDd484D8g46HL35PBwnXVWHRIJ21iamMKXINQFNqtCaKZZzXqalk0S40imZUpMpA7gLkKsE8Vq4TOWKmJSbwlrL2V20Wfva3keYKgtwNnfOpIarMlVClNzyInNCa23JFnoBu1p1XLmoosGdkurMVlfdVm8h0Z96pbsM6aFQx-zijum6Y7NKEnJxl2c9WVXA0MFKI2vrl9AgF2UGWjGHNvdW9LYelMECAbKSB_-2sKfo8qfdUfVhsv_-IbpCAaYFv3PCHqHNdr60jwFWtepJ5J5f0xwi9A |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence+of+Spin+Coating+and+Dip+Coating+with+Gelatin%2FHydroxyapatite+for+Bioresorbable+Mg+Alloy+Orthopedic+Implants%3A+In+Vitro+and+In+Vivo+Studies&rft.jtitle=ACS+biomaterials+science+%26+engineering&rft.au=Tran%2C+Duong-Thuy&rft.au=Chen%2C+Fang-Hsu&rft.au=Wu%2C+Guan-Lin&rft.au=Ching%2C+Paula+Carmela+O&rft.date=2023-02-13&rft.issn=2373-9878&rft.eissn=2373-9878&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=705&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021%2Facsbiomaterials.2c01122&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2373-9878&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2373-9878&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2373-9878&client=summon |