Engineering the Mechanical Stability of a Therapeutic Complex between Affibody and Programmed Death-Ligand 1 by Anchor Point Selection

Protein–protein complexes can vary in mechanical stability depending on the direction from which force is applied. Here, we investigated the mechanical stability of a complex between a binding scaffold called Affibody and an immune checkpoint protein Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1). We used AFM si...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inACS nano Vol. 18; no. 46; pp. 31912 - 31922
Main Authors Yang, Byeongseon, Gomes, Diego E. B., Liu, Zhaowei, Santos, Mariana Sá, Li, Jiajun, Bernardi, Rafael C., Nash, Michael A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Chemical Society 19.11.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1936-0851
1936-086X
1936-086X
DOI10.1021/acsnano.4c09220

Cover

More Information
Summary:Protein–protein complexes can vary in mechanical stability depending on the direction from which force is applied. Here, we investigated the mechanical stability of a complex between a binding scaffold called Affibody and an immune checkpoint protein Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1). We used AFM single-molecule force spectroscopy with bioorthogonal clickable peptide handles, shear stress bead adhesion assays, molecular modeling, and steered molecular dynamics (SMD) to understand the pulling point dependency of the mechanostability of the Affibody:(PD-L1) complex. We observed a wide range of rupture forces depending on the anchor point. Pulling from residue #22 on Affibody generated an intermediate state attributed to partially unfolded PD-L1, while pulling from Affibody’s N-terminus generated a force-activated catch bond. Pulling from residue #22 or #47 on Affibody generated high rupture forces, with the complex breaking at up to ∼190 pN under loading rates of ∼104–105 pN/s, representing a ∼4-fold increase as compared with low-force N-terminal pulling. SMD simulations showed relative tendencies in rupture forces that were consistent with experiments and, through visualization of force propagation networks, provided mechanistic insights. These results demonstrate how the mechanical properties of protein–protein interfaces can be controlled by informed choice of site-specific bioconjugation points within molecules, with implications for optimal bioconjugation strategies in drug delivery vehicles.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1936-0851
1936-086X
1936-086X
DOI:10.1021/acsnano.4c09220