Non–HDL Cholesterol, Apolipoproteins A-I and B100, Standard Lipid Measures, Lipid Ratios, and CRP as Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease in Women

CONTEXT Current guidelines for cardiovascular risk detection are controversial with regard to the clinical utility of different lipid measures, non–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non–HDL-C), lipid ratios, apolipoproteins, and C-reactive protein (CRP). OBJECTIVE To directly compare the clinica...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association Vol. 294; no. 3; pp. 326 - 333
Main Authors Ridker, Paul M, Rifai, Nader, Cook, Nancy R, Bradwin, Gary, Buring, Julie E
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chicago, IL American Medical Association 20.07.2005
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0098-7484
1538-3598
1538-3598
DOI10.1001/jama.294.3.326

Cover

Abstract CONTEXT Current guidelines for cardiovascular risk detection are controversial with regard to the clinical utility of different lipid measures, non–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non–HDL-C), lipid ratios, apolipoproteins, and C-reactive protein (CRP). OBJECTIVE To directly compare the clinical utility of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), HDL-C, non–HDL-C, apolipoproteins A-I and B100, high-sensitivity CRP, and the ratios of total cholesterol to HDL-C, LDL-C to HDL-C, apolipoprotein B100 to apolipoprotein A-I, and apolipoprotein B100 to HDL-C as predictors of future cardiovascular events in women. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Prospective cohort study of 15 632 initially healthy US women aged 45 years or older (interquartile range, 48-59 years) who were enrolled between November 1992 and July 1995. All participants were followed up over a 10-year period for the occurrence of future cardiovascular events. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for first-ever major cardiovascular events (N = 464) according to baseline levels of each biomarker. RESULTS After adjustment for age, smoking status, blood pressure, diabetes, and body mass index, the HRs for future cardiovascular events for those in the extreme quintiles were 1.62 (95% CI, 1.17-2.25) for LDL-C, 1.75 (95% CI, 1.30-2.38) for apolipoprotein A-I, 2.08 (95% CI, 1.45-2.97) for total cholesterol, 2.32 (95% CI, 1.64-3.33) for HDL-C, 2.50 (95% CI, 1.68-3.72) for apolipoprotein B100, 2.51 (95% CI, 1.69-3.72) for non–HDL-C, and 2.98 (95% CI, 1.90-4.67) for high-sensitivity CRP (P<.001 for trend across all quintiles). The HRs for the lipid ratios were 3.01 (95% CI, 2.01-4.50) for apolipoprotein B100 to apolipoprotein A-I, 3.18 (95% CI, 2.12-4.75) for LDL-C to HDL-C, 3.56 (95% CI, 2.31-5.47) for apolipoprotein B100 to HDL-C, and 3.81 (95% CI, 2.47-5.86) for the total cholesterol to HDL-C (P<.001 for trend across all quintiles). The correlation coefficients between high-sensitivity CRP and the lipid parameters ranged from −0.33 to 0.15, and the clinical cut points for CRP of less than 1, 1 to 3, and higher than 3 mg/L provided prognostic information on risk across increasing levels of each lipid measure and lipid ratio. CONCLUSIONS Non–HDL-C and the ratio of total cholesterol to HDL-C were as good as or better than apolipoprotein fractions in the prediction of future cardiovascular events. After adjustment for age, blood pressure, smoking, diabetes, and obesity, high-sensitivity CRP added prognostic information beyond that conveyed by all lipid measures.
AbstractList Current guidelines for cardiovascular risk detection are controversial with regard to the clinical utility of different lipid measures, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), lipid ratios, apolipoproteins, and C-reactive protein (CRP).CONTEXTCurrent guidelines for cardiovascular risk detection are controversial with regard to the clinical utility of different lipid measures, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), lipid ratios, apolipoproteins, and C-reactive protein (CRP).To directly compare the clinical utility of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), HDL-C, non-HDL-C, apolipoproteins A-I and B(100), high-sensitivity CRP, and the ratios of total cholesterol to HDL-C, LDL-C to HDL-C, apolipoprotein B(100) to apolipoprotein A-I, and apolipoprotein B(100) to HDL-C as predictors of future cardiovascular events in women.OBJECTIVETo directly compare the clinical utility of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), HDL-C, non-HDL-C, apolipoproteins A-I and B(100), high-sensitivity CRP, and the ratios of total cholesterol to HDL-C, LDL-C to HDL-C, apolipoprotein B(100) to apolipoprotein A-I, and apolipoprotein B(100) to HDL-C as predictors of future cardiovascular events in women.Prospective cohort study of 15,632 initially healthy US women aged 45 years or older (interquartile range, 48-59 years) who were enrolled between November 1992 and July 1995. All participants were followed up over a 10-year period for the occurrence of future cardiovascular events.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSProspective cohort study of 15,632 initially healthy US women aged 45 years or older (interquartile range, 48-59 years) who were enrolled between November 1992 and July 1995. All participants were followed up over a 10-year period for the occurrence of future cardiovascular events.Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for first-ever major cardiovascular events (N = 464) according to baseline levels of each biomarker.MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREHazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for first-ever major cardiovascular events (N = 464) according to baseline levels of each biomarker.After adjustment for age, smoking status, blood pressure, diabetes, and body mass index, the HRs for future cardiovascular events for those in the extreme quintiles were 1.62 (95% CI, 1.17-2.25) for LDL-C, 1.75 (95% CI, 1.30-2.38) for apolipoprotein A-I, 2.08 (95% CI, 1.45-2.97) for total cholesterol, 2.32 (95% CI, 1.64-3.33) for HDL-C, 2.50 (95% CI, 1.68-3.72) for apolipoprotein B(100), 2.51 (95% CI, 1.69-3.72) for non-HDL-C, and 2.98 (95% CI, 1.90-4.67) for high-sensitivity CRP (P<.001 for trend across all quintiles). The HRs for the lipid ratios were 3.01 (95% CI, 2.01-4.50) for apolipoprotein B(100) to apolipoprotein A-I, 3.18 (95% CI, 2.12-4.75) for LDL-C to HDL-C, 3.56 (95% CI, 2.31-5.47) for apolipoprotein B(100) to HDL-C, and 3.81 (95% CI, 2.47-5.86) for the total cholesterol to HDL-C (P<.001 for trend across all quintiles). The correlation coefficients between high-sensitivity CRP and the lipid parameters ranged from -0.33 to 0.15, and the clinical cut points for CRP of less than 1, 1 to 3, and higher than 3 mg/L provided prognostic information on risk across increasing levels of each lipid measure and lipid ratio.RESULTSAfter adjustment for age, smoking status, blood pressure, diabetes, and body mass index, the HRs for future cardiovascular events for those in the extreme quintiles were 1.62 (95% CI, 1.17-2.25) for LDL-C, 1.75 (95% CI, 1.30-2.38) for apolipoprotein A-I, 2.08 (95% CI, 1.45-2.97) for total cholesterol, 2.32 (95% CI, 1.64-3.33) for HDL-C, 2.50 (95% CI, 1.68-3.72) for apolipoprotein B(100), 2.51 (95% CI, 1.69-3.72) for non-HDL-C, and 2.98 (95% CI, 1.90-4.67) for high-sensitivity CRP (P<.001 for trend across all quintiles). The HRs for the lipid ratios were 3.01 (95% CI, 2.01-4.50) for apolipoprotein B(100) to apolipoprotein A-I, 3.18 (95% CI, 2.12-4.75) for LDL-C to HDL-C, 3.56 (95% CI, 2.31-5.47) for apolipoprotein B(100) to HDL-C, and 3.81 (95% CI, 2.47-5.86) for the total cholesterol to HDL-C (P<.001 for trend across all quintiles). The correlation coefficients between high-sensitivity CRP and the lipid parameters ranged from -0.33 to 0.15, and the clinical cut points for CRP of less than 1, 1 to 3, and higher than 3 mg/L provided prognostic information on risk across increasing levels of each lipid measure and lipid ratio.Non-HDL-C and the ratio of total cholesterol to HDL-C were as good as or better than apolipoprotein fractions in the prediction of future cardiovascular events. After adjustment for age, blood pressure, smoking, diabetes, and obesity, high-sensitivity CRP added prognostic information beyond that conveyed by all lipid measures.CONCLUSIONSNon-HDL-C and the ratio of total cholesterol to HDL-C were as good as or better than apolipoprotein fractions in the prediction of future cardiovascular events. After adjustment for age, blood pressure, smoking, diabetes, and obesity, high-sensitivity CRP added prognostic information beyond that conveyed by all lipid measures.
CONTEXT Current guidelines for cardiovascular risk detection are controversial with regard to the clinical utility of different lipid measures, non–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non–HDL-C), lipid ratios, apolipoproteins, and C-reactive protein (CRP). OBJECTIVE To directly compare the clinical utility of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), HDL-C, non–HDL-C, apolipoproteins A-I and B100, high-sensitivity CRP, and the ratios of total cholesterol to HDL-C, LDL-C to HDL-C, apolipoprotein B100 to apolipoprotein A-I, and apolipoprotein B100 to HDL-C as predictors of future cardiovascular events in women. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Prospective cohort study of 15 632 initially healthy US women aged 45 years or older (interquartile range, 48-59 years) who were enrolled between November 1992 and July 1995. All participants were followed up over a 10-year period for the occurrence of future cardiovascular events. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for first-ever major cardiovascular events (N = 464) according to baseline levels of each biomarker. RESULTS After adjustment for age, smoking status, blood pressure, diabetes, and body mass index, the HRs for future cardiovascular events for those in the extreme quintiles were 1.62 (95% CI, 1.17-2.25) for LDL-C, 1.75 (95% CI, 1.30-2.38) for apolipoprotein A-I, 2.08 (95% CI, 1.45-2.97) for total cholesterol, 2.32 (95% CI, 1.64-3.33) for HDL-C, 2.50 (95% CI, 1.68-3.72) for apolipoprotein B100, 2.51 (95% CI, 1.69-3.72) for non–HDL-C, and 2.98 (95% CI, 1.90-4.67) for high-sensitivity CRP (P<.001 for trend across all quintiles). The HRs for the lipid ratios were 3.01 (95% CI, 2.01-4.50) for apolipoprotein B100 to apolipoprotein A-I, 3.18 (95% CI, 2.12-4.75) for LDL-C to HDL-C, 3.56 (95% CI, 2.31-5.47) for apolipoprotein B100 to HDL-C, and 3.81 (95% CI, 2.47-5.86) for the total cholesterol to HDL-C (P<.001 for trend across all quintiles). The correlation coefficients between high-sensitivity CRP and the lipid parameters ranged from −0.33 to 0.15, and the clinical cut points for CRP of less than 1, 1 to 3, and higher than 3 mg/L provided prognostic information on risk across increasing levels of each lipid measure and lipid ratio. CONCLUSIONS Non–HDL-C and the ratio of total cholesterol to HDL-C were as good as or better than apolipoprotein fractions in the prediction of future cardiovascular events. After adjustment for age, blood pressure, smoking, diabetes, and obesity, high-sensitivity CRP added prognostic information beyond that conveyed by all lipid measures.
Current guidelines for cardiovascular risk detection are controversial with regard to the clinical utility of different lipid measures, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), lipid ratios, apolipoproteins, and C-reactive protein (CRP). To directly compare the clinical utility of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), HDL-C, non-HDL-C, apolipoproteins A-I and B(100), high-sensitivity CRP, and the ratios of total cholesterol to HDL-C, LDL-C to HDL-C, apolipoprotein B(100) to apolipoprotein A-I, and apolipoprotein B(100) to HDL-C as predictors of future cardiovascular events in women. Prospective cohort study of 15,632 initially healthy US women aged 45 years or older (interquartile range, 48-59 years) who were enrolled between November 1992 and July 1995. All participants were followed up over a 10-year period for the occurrence of future cardiovascular events. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for first-ever major cardiovascular events (N = 464) according to baseline levels of each biomarker. After adjustment for age, smoking status, blood pressure, diabetes, and body mass index, the HRs for future cardiovascular events for those in the extreme quintiles were 1.62 (95% CI, 1.17-2.25) for LDL-C, 1.75 (95% CI, 1.30-2.38) for apolipoprotein A-I, 2.08 (95% CI, 1.45-2.97) for total cholesterol, 2.32 (95% CI, 1.64-3.33) for HDL-C, 2.50 (95% CI, 1.68-3.72) for apolipoprotein B(100), 2.51 (95% CI, 1.69-3.72) for non-HDL-C, and 2.98 (95% CI, 1.90-4.67) for high-sensitivity CRP (P<.001 for trend across all quintiles). The HRs for the lipid ratios were 3.01 (95% CI, 2.01-4.50) for apolipoprotein B(100) to apolipoprotein A-I, 3.18 (95% CI, 2.12-4.75) for LDL-C to HDL-C, 3.56 (95% CI, 2.31-5.47) for apolipoprotein B(100) to HDL-C, and 3.81 (95% CI, 2.47-5.86) for the total cholesterol to HDL-C (P<.001 for trend across all quintiles). The correlation coefficients between high-sensitivity CRP and the lipid parameters ranged from -0.33 to 0.15, and the clinical cut points for CRP of less than 1, 1 to 3, and higher than 3 mg/L provided prognostic information on risk across increasing levels of each lipid measure and lipid ratio. Non-HDL-C and the ratio of total cholesterol to HDL-C were as good as or better than apolipoprotein fractions in the prediction of future cardiovascular events. After adjustment for age, blood pressure, smoking, diabetes, and obesity, high-sensitivity CRP added prognostic information beyond that conveyed by all lipid measures.
Author Cook, Nancy R
Bradwin, Gary
Rifai, Nader
Buring, Julie E
Ridker, Paul M
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Paul M
  surname: Ridker
  fullname: Ridker, Paul M
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Nader
  surname: Rifai
  fullname: Rifai, Nader
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Nancy R
  surname: Cook
  fullname: Cook, Nancy R
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Gary
  surname: Bradwin
  fullname: Bradwin, Gary
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Julie E
  surname: Buring
  fullname: Buring, Julie E
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16948648$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16030277$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpNkc1uFDEMxyNURLeFKxIXlAucdpZkksnHcZnSD2kLaAFxXHkniUiZSYZkBokb78CB9-uTENQtwhfb8s-2_vYJOgoxWISeUrKihNBXNzDAqtZ8xVasFg_QgjZMVazR6ggtCNGqklzxY3SS8w0pRpl8hI6pIIzUUi7Q77cx3P78dXm2we2X2Ns82RT7JV6PsfdjHFOcrA8Zr6srDMHg12XrEn-YSgzJ4I0fvcHXFvKcbF4e8i1MPpbsb0O7fY8h463PX_E5dFNMGbuYcFvaffwOuZt7SPjM5zLEYh_w5zjY8Bg9dNBn--TgT9Gn8zcf28tq8-7iql1vKqgbNlVM6T21TgphaWckkbUwwIxjRBjRMSr2zGgAwrpGubrRznAuHTfcOQLUaXaKXt7NLUq_zUX-bvC5s30PwcY574QijZZSFvD5AZz3gzW7MfkB0o_d_SkL8OIAFE3QuwSh8_k_TnMluCrcszuufO5ftSa0bgj7A-GYjSg
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2005 INIST-CNRS
Copyright_xml – notice: 2005 INIST-CNRS
DBID IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1001/jama.294.3.326
DatabaseName Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic

MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1538-3598
EndPage 333
ExternalDocumentID 16030277
16948648
201250
Genre Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
GroupedDBID ---
-ET
-~X
.55
.GJ
.XZ
0R~
0WA
186
18M
1KJ
1VV
29J
2CT
2FS
2KS
2WC
354
39C
4.4
53G
5GY
5RE
6TJ
85S
AAIKC
AAMNW
AAQQT
AAWTL
AAYOK
ABCQX
ABEFU
ABEHJ
ABIVO
ABOCM
ABPMR
ABPPZ
ABRSH
ABWJO
ACAHW
ACGFS
ACNCT
ACPRK
ADBBV
ADUKH
ADXHL
AETEA
AFCHL
AFFNX
AFHKK
AFRAH
AGFXO
AGHSJ
AHMBA
AI.
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMJDE
ANMPU
ARBJA
BKOMP
BRYMA
C45
CJ0
CS3
EAM
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
EX3
F5P
HF~
J5H
KOO
KQ8
L7B
MVM
N4W
N9A
NEJ
NHB
OBH
OCB
OGEVE
OHH
OHT
OMK
OVD
P-O
P2P
PQQKQ
RAJ
RNS
SJN
SKT
SV3
TEORI
TN5
UBY
UHB
UKR
UMD
UPT
VH1
VVN
WH7
WHG
WOW
X7M
XHN
XOL
XSW
XZL
YFH
YHZ
YOC
YPV
YQJ
YQT
YQY
YR2
YR5
YSK
YYM
YZZ
ZCA
ZCG
ZGI
ZXP
1CY
3O-
9M8
AAOGT
AAQOH
AAYJJ
ABBLC
ABDPE
ACBNA
ACCUC
ACQAM
ACTDY
D0S
EBD
FA8
H13
IQODW
QJJ
S10
UAP
UBC
UHU
WOQ
XJT
YQI
YRY
YXB
YYQ
~H1
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
GX1
NPM
NYF
OK1
PKN
UIG
YCJ
YIF
YIN
ZKG
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-a253t-389b1ef766e1cd70726da3df306d6c316b3d9aa03c58f259fd447f4d4ff0a1f93
ISSN 0098-7484
1538-3598
IngestDate Thu Sep 04 16:05:10 EDT 2025
Thu Feb 13 05:32:21 EST 2025
Mon Jul 21 09:16:40 EDT 2025
Wed Jun 25 03:37:35 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Keywords Human
Cardiovascular disease
Lipids
Epidemiology
Standards
Vascular disease
Medicine
Apolipoprotein A
Cholesterol HDL
Atherosclerosis
Risk factor
Cardiovascular risk
Adult
Female
Woman
Language English
License CC BY 4.0
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-a253t-389b1ef766e1cd70726da3df306d6c316b3d9aa03c58f259fd447f4d4ff0a1f93
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 16030277
PQID 68059777
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_68059777
pubmed_primary_16030277
pascalfrancis_primary_16948648
ama_primary_201250
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2005-07-20
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2005-07-20
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2005
  text: 2005-07-20
  day: 20
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace Chicago, IL
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Chicago, IL
– name: United States
PublicationTitle JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association
PublicationTitleAlternate JAMA
PublicationYear 2005
Publisher American Medical Association
Publisher_xml – name: American Medical Association
References 16352785 - JAMA. 2005 Dec 14;294(22):2843-4; author reply 2844
16352786 - JAMA. 2005 Dec 14;294(22):2843; author reply 2844
References_xml – reference: 16352786 - JAMA. 2005 Dec 14;294(22):2843; author reply 2844
– reference: 16352785 - JAMA. 2005 Dec 14;294(22):2843-4; author reply 2844
SSID ssj0000137
Score 2.410259
Snippet CONTEXT Current guidelines for cardiovascular risk detection are controversial with regard to the clinical utility of different lipid measures,...
Current guidelines for cardiovascular risk detection are controversial with regard to the clinical utility of different lipid measures, non-high-density...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
pascalfrancis
ama
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 326
SubjectTerms Apolipoproteins - blood
Atherosclerosis (general aspects, experimental research)
Biological and medical sciences
Biomarkers - blood
Blood and lymphatic vessels
C-Reactive Protein - metabolism
Cardiology. Vascular system
Cardiovascular Diseases - blood
Cardiovascular Diseases - epidemiology
Cholesterol - blood
Female
General aspects
Humans
Lipoproteins - blood
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Proportional Hazards Models
Prospective Studies
Risk Factors
Title Non–HDL Cholesterol, Apolipoproteins A-I and B100, Standard Lipid Measures, Lipid Ratios, and CRP as Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease in Women
URI http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.294.3.326
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16030277
https://www.proquest.com/docview/68059777
Volume 294
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFLbKkBASQoxruQw_8NZmSuLESR9Ly2gZ26DaxN4qJ46lSZBWtH3hf_An-RWc40viFtCAl6h1Y7fK-Xp8fPz5O4S8GgzSUqoUwFsqHiQqYkGexlkAM0vJ00SpguNB4ZNTPrlI3l2ml53OD4-1tFkXh-W3354r-R-rQhvYFU_J_oNlm0GhAV6DfeEKFobrX9n4dFEHk_H7HrowrXhgymUJrLywXGgJBmTADIOp3iN4HWFJ5lGbPoC7rmTvi0kTaoOaFo2KlSN2jmYfsBqNJqG78jxITiy3qax2qwcTKFrWYSvsBdfecxQST6zCO9fS7hntIga3g6bjY0PZQCZjm8GdTY-GUzNJyJZmPDo7O25mDo8RORuOP001reGtsOxnl-9IMZEahy1Cr_tR1tG3MqmNo49NOWWLaOa5bRZzLwJgRprjl8nFK2oAQx2yw6abr-K9M7s2nMeID5KcJ_kNcjPOIM5DAsHH3JM629Z3dQKjjUKW-0YnCXxnCfYVn5Wpv_LnBZIOlM7vkbt2hUOHBq77pFPV98mtE8vheEC-W9RSD7V9uoNZCpilAD6KmO1Th1iq8UkdYvv2vcFrX3cAtFKxoohWatFKAa10G63UopVe1VSj9SG5OHpzPpoEtjhIIOKUrQMItIuoUvAkq6iUWZjFXAomFSyBJS9ZxAsmB0KErExzBWt8JZMkU4kE9xOKSA3YI7JXL-rqCaEc7pGocyRi3OYviyxRcR5XaYk5mzztkn144vOlkX-ZQ8gM64YuOdgyQPOxs3OXvHQWmYPLxn04UVeLzWrO8xBVH7MueWwM5fUNkUeQPb1u8GfkdvvfeE721l831QuIjtfFgYbVT_Uauh8
linkProvider Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Non-HDL+cholesterol%2C+apolipoproteins+A-I+and+B100%2C+standard+lipid+measures%2C+lipid+ratios%2C+and+CRP+as+risk+factors+for+cardiovascular+disease+in+women&rft.jtitle=JAMA+%3A+the+journal+of+the+American+Medical+Association&rft.au=RIDKER%2C+Paul+M&rft.au=RIFAI%2C+Nader&rft.au=COOK%2C+Nancy+R&rft.au=BRADWIN%2C+Gary&rft.date=2005-07-20&rft.pub=American+Medical+Association&rft.issn=0098-7484&rft.volume=294&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=326&rft.epage=333&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001%2Fjama.294.3.326&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=16948648
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0098-7484&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0098-7484&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0098-7484&client=summon