The Binding of Cu2+ to Lipid Membranes Is Not Substantially Influenced by Electrostatic Screening

Gouy–Chapman theory predicts that salt screening and modulating the interfacial charge density should strongly influence the apparent dissociation constant, K d,app, between Cu2+ and negatively charged phosphatidylserine (PS) lipids in supported lipid bilayers (SLBs). Specifically, K d,app would be...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American Chemical Society Vol. 147; no. 10; pp. 8386 - 8397
Main Authors Reynolds, Christopher M., Fiebig, Olivia C., Marroquin, Alexa, Glaid, Andrew J., Chokhany, Kushaal, Zdenek, Ryan G., da Cruz Garcia, Maria Laura, Cremer, Paul S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published American Chemical Society 12.03.2025
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0002-7863
1520-5126
1520-5126
DOI10.1021/jacs.4c16066

Cover

Abstract Gouy–Chapman theory predicts that salt screening and modulating the interfacial charge density should strongly influence the apparent dissociation constant, K d,app, between Cu2+ and negatively charged phosphatidylserine (PS) lipids in supported lipid bilayers (SLBs). Specifically, K d,app would be expected to increase (weaken binding) by a factor of 40 when 100 mM NaCl is introduced into the solution because of electrostatic screening between the membrane and Cu2+ cations. Surprisingly, however, fluorescence quenching measurements demonstrate that K d,app increases by less than a factor of 2 when increasing the salt concentration in the presence of standard buffers, such as tris­(hydroxymethyl)­aminomethane (Tris). Moreover, increasing the negative surface charge density by a factor of 4 would be predicted to decrease (strengthen binding) K d,app by 3 orders of magnitude. Instead, K d,app increases slightly when 15 mol % phosphatidylglycerol (PG), a negatively charged lipid, is introduced into SLBs already containing 5 mol % PS. Such findings indicate that electrostatic double layer theory is not a useful approach for predicting the binding behavior of transition metal cations to negatively charged interfaces. The problem lies with the fact that standard buffers, such as Tris, form a wide variety of coordination complexes in bulk solution with transition metal cations like Cu2+. Typically, dozens of complexes are present simultaneously at any given pH value and the net charge on them ranges from positive to neutral to negative. Such variations in charge on the complexes result in electrostatic screening and interfacial potential effects that are substantially diminished or nonexistent. These results should generally apply to the binding behavior of first row transition metal ions, when the cations predominantly reside in complexes rather than as free ions. This includes in vivo conditions, where the concentration of free transition metal ions is often very low.
AbstractList Gouy–Chapman theory predicts that salt screening and modulating the interfacial charge density should strongly influence the apparent dissociation constant, K d,ₐₚₚ, between Cu²⁺ and negatively charged phosphatidylserine (PS) lipids in supported lipid bilayers (SLBs). Specifically, K d,ₐₚₚ would be expected to increase (weaken binding) by a factor of 40 when 100 mM NaCl is introduced into the solution because of electrostatic screening between the membrane and Cu²⁺ cations. Surprisingly, however, fluorescence quenching measurements demonstrate that K d,ₐₚₚ increases by less than a factor of 2 when increasing the salt concentration in the presence of standard buffers, such as tris­(hydroxymethyl)­aminomethane (Tris). Moreover, increasing the negative surface charge density by a factor of 4 would be predicted to decrease (strengthen binding) K d,ₐₚₚ by 3 orders of magnitude. Instead, K d,ₐₚₚ increases slightly when 15 mol % phosphatidylglycerol (PG), a negatively charged lipid, is introduced into SLBs already containing 5 mol % PS. Such findings indicate that electrostatic double layer theory is not a useful approach for predicting the binding behavior of transition metal cations to negatively charged interfaces. The problem lies with the fact that standard buffers, such as Tris, form a wide variety of coordination complexes in bulk solution with transition metal cations like Cu²⁺. Typically, dozens of complexes are present simultaneously at any given pH value and the net charge on them ranges from positive to neutral to negative. Such variations in charge on the complexes result in electrostatic screening and interfacial potential effects that are substantially diminished or nonexistent. These results should generally apply to the binding behavior of first row transition metal ions, when the cations predominantly reside in complexes rather than as free ions. This includes in vivo conditions, where the concentration of free transition metal ions is often very low.
Gouy-Chapman theory predicts that salt screening and modulating the interfacial charge density should strongly influence the apparent dissociation constant, Kd,app, between Cu2+ and negatively charged phosphatidylserine (PS) lipids in supported lipid bilayers (SLBs). Specifically, Kd,app would be expected to increase (weaken binding) by a factor of 40 when 100 mM NaCl is introduced into the solution because of electrostatic screening between the membrane and Cu2+ cations. Surprisingly, however, fluorescence quenching measurements demonstrate that Kd,app increases by less than a factor of 2 when increasing the salt concentration in the presence of standard buffers, such as tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Tris). Moreover, increasing the negative surface charge density by a factor of 4 would be predicted to decrease (strengthen binding) Kd,app by 3 orders of magnitude. Instead, Kd,app increases slightly when 15 mol % phosphatidylglycerol (PG), a negatively charged lipid, is introduced into SLBs already containing 5 mol % PS. Such findings indicate that electrostatic double layer theory is not a useful approach for predicting the binding behavior of transition metal cations to negatively charged interfaces. The problem lies with the fact that standard buffers, such as Tris, form a wide variety of coordination complexes in bulk solution with transition metal cations like Cu2+. Typically, dozens of complexes are present simultaneously at any given pH value and the net charge on them ranges from positive to neutral to negative. Such variations in charge on the complexes result in electrostatic screening and interfacial potential effects that are substantially diminished or nonexistent. These results should generally apply to the binding behavior of first row transition metal ions, when the cations predominantly reside in complexes rather than as free ions. This includes in vivo conditions, where the concentration of free transition metal ions is often very low.Gouy-Chapman theory predicts that salt screening and modulating the interfacial charge density should strongly influence the apparent dissociation constant, Kd,app, between Cu2+ and negatively charged phosphatidylserine (PS) lipids in supported lipid bilayers (SLBs). Specifically, Kd,app would be expected to increase (weaken binding) by a factor of 40 when 100 mM NaCl is introduced into the solution because of electrostatic screening between the membrane and Cu2+ cations. Surprisingly, however, fluorescence quenching measurements demonstrate that Kd,app increases by less than a factor of 2 when increasing the salt concentration in the presence of standard buffers, such as tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Tris). Moreover, increasing the negative surface charge density by a factor of 4 would be predicted to decrease (strengthen binding) Kd,app by 3 orders of magnitude. Instead, Kd,app increases slightly when 15 mol % phosphatidylglycerol (PG), a negatively charged lipid, is introduced into SLBs already containing 5 mol % PS. Such findings indicate that electrostatic double layer theory is not a useful approach for predicting the binding behavior of transition metal cations to negatively charged interfaces. The problem lies with the fact that standard buffers, such as Tris, form a wide variety of coordination complexes in bulk solution with transition metal cations like Cu2+. Typically, dozens of complexes are present simultaneously at any given pH value and the net charge on them ranges from positive to neutral to negative. Such variations in charge on the complexes result in electrostatic screening and interfacial potential effects that are substantially diminished or nonexistent. These results should generally apply to the binding behavior of first row transition metal ions, when the cations predominantly reside in complexes rather than as free ions. This includes in vivo conditions, where the concentration of free transition metal ions is often very low.
Gouy–Chapman theory predicts that salt screening and modulating the interfacial charge density should strongly influence the apparent dissociation constant, K d,app, between Cu2+ and negatively charged phosphatidylserine (PS) lipids in supported lipid bilayers (SLBs). Specifically, K d,app would be expected to increase (weaken binding) by a factor of 40 when 100 mM NaCl is introduced into the solution because of electrostatic screening between the membrane and Cu2+ cations. Surprisingly, however, fluorescence quenching measurements demonstrate that K d,app increases by less than a factor of 2 when increasing the salt concentration in the presence of standard buffers, such as tris­(hydroxymethyl)­aminomethane (Tris). Moreover, increasing the negative surface charge density by a factor of 4 would be predicted to decrease (strengthen binding) K d,app by 3 orders of magnitude. Instead, K d,app increases slightly when 15 mol % phosphatidylglycerol (PG), a negatively charged lipid, is introduced into SLBs already containing 5 mol % PS. Such findings indicate that electrostatic double layer theory is not a useful approach for predicting the binding behavior of transition metal cations to negatively charged interfaces. The problem lies with the fact that standard buffers, such as Tris, form a wide variety of coordination complexes in bulk solution with transition metal cations like Cu2+. Typically, dozens of complexes are present simultaneously at any given pH value and the net charge on them ranges from positive to neutral to negative. Such variations in charge on the complexes result in electrostatic screening and interfacial potential effects that are substantially diminished or nonexistent. These results should generally apply to the binding behavior of first row transition metal ions, when the cations predominantly reside in complexes rather than as free ions. This includes in vivo conditions, where the concentration of free transition metal ions is often very low.
Author Glaid, Andrew J.
da Cruz Garcia, Maria Laura
Zdenek, Ryan G.
Cremer, Paul S.
Fiebig, Olivia C.
Marroquin, Alexa
Reynolds, Christopher M.
Chokhany, Kushaal
AuthorAffiliation Department of Chemistry
The Pennsylvania State University
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: Department of Chemistry
– name: The Pennsylvania State University
– name: Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Christopher M.
  surname: Reynolds
  fullname: Reynolds, Christopher M.
  organization: Department of Chemistry
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Olivia C.
  orcidid: 0000-0002-5265-1636
  surname: Fiebig
  fullname: Fiebig, Olivia C.
  organization: Department of Chemistry
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Alexa
  surname: Marroquin
  fullname: Marroquin, Alexa
  organization: Department of Chemistry
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Andrew J.
  surname: Glaid
  fullname: Glaid, Andrew J.
  organization: Department of Chemistry
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Kushaal
  surname: Chokhany
  fullname: Chokhany, Kushaal
  organization: The Pennsylvania State University
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Ryan G.
  surname: Zdenek
  fullname: Zdenek, Ryan G.
  organization: Department of Chemistry
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Maria Laura
  surname: da Cruz Garcia
  fullname: da Cruz Garcia, Maria Laura
  organization: Department of Chemistry
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Paul S.
  orcidid: 0000-0002-8524-0438
  surname: Cremer
  fullname: Cremer, Paul S.
  email: psc11@psu.edu
  organization: The Pennsylvania State University
BookMark eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EEqVw4wf4iIRS7PUjyREqHpUKHFrOke1sIFVql9g59N-Tih64cVqNdjSa-S7IqQ8eCbnmbMYZ8LuNcXEmHddM6xMy4QpYpjjoUzJhjEGWF1qck4sYN6OUUPAJMesvpA-tr1v_SUND5wPc0hTost21NX3Fre2Nx0gXkb6FRFeDjcn41Jqu29OFb7oBvcOa2j197NClPoz_1Dq6cj2iH1MvyVljuohXxzslH0-P6_lLtnx_Xszvl5nhhUwZoAGlMBeN1MaAsw1IqZSUJbcSC1UzyxzjQhY1YF3mBgw01qIsERpdlGJKbn5zd334HjCmattGh1039g9DrASMCDRTufjfynMhmSrVH-uIttqEoffjhoqz6gC8OgCvjsDFD6-QdKU
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2025 American Chemical Society
Copyright_xml – notice: 2025 American Chemical Society
DBID 7X8
7S9
L.6
DOI 10.1021/jacs.4c16066
DatabaseName MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitleList AGRICOLA
MEDLINE - Academic

DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Chemistry
EISSN 1520-5126
EndPage 8397
ExternalDocumentID a868572638
GroupedDBID ---
-DZ
-ET
-~X
.DC
.K2
4.4
55A
5GY
5RE
5VS
7~N
85S
AABXI
AAHBH
ABJNI
ABMVS
ABPPZ
ABQRX
ABUCX
ACBEA
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACJ
ACNCT
ACS
ADHLV
AEESW
AENEX
AFEFF
AGXLV
AHGAQ
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AQSVZ
BAANH
BKOMP
CS3
CUPRZ
DU5
EBS
ED~
F5P
GGK
GNL
IH2
IH9
JG~
LG6
P2P
ROL
RXW
TAE
TN5
UHB
UI2
UKR
UPT
VF5
VG9
VQA
W1F
WH7
XSW
YQT
YZZ
ZCA
~02
7X8
AAYWT
ABBLG
ABLBI
7S9
L.6
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-a184t-2ea255e73f46aa2cbf244554491b4e85d0b0c01348d2ed97a2a2fbbe49e2f6893
IEDL.DBID ACS
ISSN 0002-7863
1520-5126
IngestDate Fri Sep 05 17:19:43 EDT 2025
Fri Sep 05 03:44:58 EDT 2025
Thu Mar 13 04:02:00 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 10
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-a184t-2ea255e73f46aa2cbf244554491b4e85d0b0c01348d2ed97a2a2fbbe49e2f6893
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-8524-0438
0000-0002-5265-1636
PQID 3173405953
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 12
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_3200260573
proquest_miscellaneous_3173405953
acs_journals_10_1021_jacs_4c16066
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20250312
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-03-12
PublicationDate_xml – month: 03
  year: 2025
  text: 20250312
  day: 12
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle Journal of the American Chemical Society
PublicationTitleAlternate J. Am. Chem. Soc
PublicationYear 2025
Publisher American Chemical Society
Publisher_xml – name: American Chemical Society
SSID ssj0004281
Score 2.4779878
Snippet Gouy–Chapman theory predicts that salt screening and modulating the interfacial charge density should strongly influence the apparent dissociation constant, K...
Gouy-Chapman theory predicts that salt screening and modulating the interfacial charge density should strongly influence the apparent dissociation constant,...
SourceID proquest
acs
SourceType Aggregation Database
Publisher
StartPage 8386
SubjectTerms dissociation
fluorescence
lipid bilayers
phosphatidylserines
salt concentration
Title The Binding of Cu2+ to Lipid Membranes Is Not Substantially Influenced by Electrostatic Screening
URI http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacs.4c16066
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3173405953
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3200260573
Volume 147
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1LS8NAEF60HvTiW3yzgjdJaSab3eSoxdoK7aUWegvZFxS1AZMc6q93Nk0otKBew-4mmX3MN-w38xFyjxCei1hZD7QUHjMc9xz43BM6NCq0zDdVUthwxPsT9joNpyuC7PoNPrj6QCpvM-U7pL1NdoCji3EQqDte5T9C5DcwV0Q8qAnu672dA1L5xqFbeZLeAXlp8nGWBJL3dlnItvreLM_4x0cekv0aTNLH5ewfkS0zPya73UbD7YSkuAro06zKXKGZpd0SHmiRUadYrenQfGKsjGcdHeR0lBXUnSJOVRjX5MeCDhr9Ek3lgj4v9XJcAtJM0bFyfB0c9ZRMes9v3b5Xiyp4KQZzhQcmxSjCiMAynqagpEUHj5iCxb5kJgp1R3YU4kIWaTA6FimkYKU0LDZgOaKbM9KaZ3Nz7lhR2JgJDIA6TsmMYWcTS6tDybTAvX5B7tAsSb0p8qS67waMN9zT2ljYppmNBG3jbivwv7MyTxDYBIgm4zD4pQ1UNdFCEVz-411XZA-ceq9j48E1aRVfpblBSFHI22o9_QDl7sTW
linkProvider American Chemical Society
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3NS8MwFA86D_Pit_htBG_SsaZp0h5n2dh062Ub7FaaLxjqCrY7zL_el65VmCC7hpc0Td5Lfo-8934IPQKEZzyUxiFKcIdqBjZHXOZw5WvpG-rqMilsFLP-lL7M_FmVrG5zYWASOYyUl4_4v9UFbJkgaKTStYB7F-35jDLL1NCJxr9pkCRwa7TLA-ZVce6bve09JPM_Z295ofQOUfwzlTKO5K21LERLfm1Uadx6rkfooIKWuLPWhWO0oxcnqBnVjG6nKAWdwM_zMo8FZwZHS_KEiwxb_mqFR_oDPGc4-fAgx3FWYHumWI5h0ND3FR7UbCYKixXurtlzbDrSXOKxtNE7MOoZmva6k6jvVBQLTgquXeEQnYJPoblnKEtTIoWB6x4QBg1dQXXgq7ZoS0CJNFBEq5CnJCVGCE1DTQwDrHOOGotsoS9sjBQIUw7uUNvymlHorENhlC-o4mD5l-gBliWpTCRPytdvAt6Hba0WC2TqTUlgbezbBfx3tswTgDkeYMvQ9_6RIWWFNJ97V1t86x41-5PRMBkO4tdrtE8sr6-N0yM3qFF8LvUtgI1C3JUq9g12yM04
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3dS8MwEA9zgvrit_htBN-ksqZp0z7OubGpG-Ic7K00XzDUVWz7MP96L1mrMEH0tU3SNLm7_I7c3Q-hC4DwAYuEdojkzKEqAJ0jbuAw6Svha-oqmxTWHwTdEb0d--MacqtcGJhEBiNl9hLfaPWb1GWFAVMqCF5Q4RrQvYSWAYu4hq2h2Rp-p0KS0K0QLwsDr4x1X-xtziKR_bC_9lDpbKDHr-nYWJLnqyLnV-JjoVLjv-a7idZLiImbc5nYQjU13UarrYrZbQclIBv4emLzWXCqcasglzhPseGxlrivXsGDBguIexkepDk2tsVwDYOkvsxwr2I1kZjPcHvOomPSkiYCD4WJ4oFRd9Go035qdZ2SasFJwMXLHaIS8C0U8zQNkoQIruHYB6RBI5dTFfqywRsC0CINJVEyYglJiOZc0UgRHQDm2UP1aTpV-yZWChpTBm5Rw_CbUeisIq6lz6lksGEH6ByWJS5VJYvtLTgBL8Q8LRcL2lQbE8PamDsM-O-0yGKAOx5gzMj3fmlDbKU0n3mHf_jWGVp5uOnE973B3RFaI4be14TrkWNUz98LdQKYI-enVso-ATq7z7I
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+Binding+of+Cu2%2B+to+Lipid+Membranes+Is+Not+Substantially+Influenced+by+Electrostatic+Screening&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+the+American+Chemical+Society&rft.au=Reynolds%2C+Christopher+M&rft.au=Fiebig%2C+Olivia+C&rft.au=Marroquin%2C+Alexa&rft.au=Glaid%2C+Andrew+J&rft.date=2025-03-12&rft.issn=1520-5126&rft.eissn=1520-5126&rft.volume=147&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=8386&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021%2Fjacs.4c16066&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0002-7863&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0002-7863&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0002-7863&client=summon