Durability and life prediction in biocomposites, fibre-reinforced composites and hybrid composites

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors Jawaid, Mohammad, Thariq, Mohamed, Saba, Naheed
Format Electronic eBook
LanguageEnglish
Published Duxford : Woodhead Publishing, ©2019.
SeriesWoodhead Publishing series in composites science and engineering.
Subjects
Online AccessFull text
ISBN9780081022986
0081022980
9780081022900
0081022905
Physical Description1 online resource

Cover

Table of Contents:
  • Front Cover
  • Durability and Life Prediction in Biocomposites,Fibre-Reinforced Composites and Hybrid Composites
  • Durability and Life Prediction in Biocomposites, Fibre-Reinforced Compositesand Hybrid Composites
  • Copyright
  • Dedication
  • Contents
  • List of contributors
  • About the editors
  • Preface
  • 1
  • Recent studies on durability of natural/synthetic fiber reinforced hybrid polymer composites
  • 1.1 Introduction
  • 1.2 Durability of hybrid composites based on ultraviolet radiation effect
  • 1.2.1 Ultraviolet testing methods
  • 1.3 Durability of hybrid composites based on moisture absorption effect
  • 1.4 Conclusions
  • References
  • 2
  • Durability of natural/synthetic/biomass fiber-based polymeric composites: laboratory and field tests
  • 2.1 Introduction
  • 2.2 Natural fibers
  • 2.3 Synthetic fibers
  • 2.4 Biomass fibers
  • 2.5 Degradation of biofibers and its properties
  • 2.6 Effect of degradation on dimensional behavior
  • 2.7 Biodegradable polymers
  • 2.8 Biodegradation
  • 2.9 Why biodegradable polymers are notable?
  • 2.10 Durability tests of biocomposites
  • 2.11 Conclusion
  • References
  • 3
  • Prediction of the cyclic durability of woven-hybrid composites
  • 3.1 Introduction
  • 3.2 Woven hybrid composites
  • 3.2.1 Description of woven architecture
  • 3.2.2 Advantages of woven hybridization
  • 3.2.3 Preparation of woven hybrid composites
  • 3.2.3.1 Hand lay-up technique
  • 3.2.3.2 Autoclave processing
  • 3.2.3.3 Pressing techniques
  • 3.3 Problems
  • 3.3.1 Durability characterization
  • 3.3.2 Cyclic durability measurements
  • 3.4 The factors influencing the durability of woven hybrid composite
  • 3.4.1 Hygrothermal behavior effects
  • 3.4.2 Thermo-oxidation effects
  • 3.4.3 UV-irradiation effects
  • 3.5 Prediction of the cyclic durability of composites
  • 3.5.1 Description of the cyclic durability test.
  • 3.5.2 Modelization of the cyclic durability
  • 3.5.2.1 Empirical/semi-empirical models (macroscopic strength models)
  • 3.5.2.2 Phenomenological models for residual stiffness/strength (residual strength/stiffness models)
  • Residual strength models
  • Residual stiffness models
  • 3.5.2.3 Progressive damage models (or mechanistic models)
  • Models predicting damage growth
  • Models predicting residual mechanical properties
  • Hashin-Rotem
  • Fawaz-Ellyin
  • Sims-Brogdon
  • Failure tensor polynomial in fatigue
  • Bond
  • Hansen
  • Post
  • Van Paepegem-Degrieck
  • 3.5.3 Modelization of cyclic durability of woven hybrid composites
  • 3.6 Conclusion
  • References
  • 4
  • Fatigue life prediction of textile/woven hybrid composites
  • 4.1 Introduction
  • 4.2 Fatigue properties of hybrid composites
  • 4.3 Factors influencing mechanical properties and fatigue life of hybrid composites
  • 4.3.1 Type and pattern of fibers
  • 4.3.2 Matrix type
  • 4.3.3 Stacking sequence
  • 4.3.4 Fiber ratio
  • 4.3.5 Fabrication method
  • 4.3.6 Loading conditions and stress ratio
  • 4.4 Summary
  • References
  • Further reading
  • 5
  • Durability of composite materials during hydrothermal and environmental aging
  • 5.1 Introduction
  • 5.2 Durability of polymer composites
  • 5.3 Polymer composites aging
  • 5.3.1 Chemical aging
  • Thermooxidation aging
  • Hydrolytic aging
  • Thermal aging
  • 5.3.2 Physical aging
  • Hydrothermal aging
  • Weathering
  • Biodegradation by micro-organisms
  • 5.3.3 Mechanical aging
  • Creep
  • Fatigue
  • 5.4 Accelerated aging of polymer composites
  • 5.4.1 Test methods
  • 5.4.2 Modeling methods
  • 5.4.2.1 Thermal ageing
  • 5.4.2.2 Hygrothermal aging
  • 5.4.2.3 Weathering
  • 5.4.2.4 UV irradiation
  • 5.4.2.5 Creep
  • 5.4.2.6 Fatigue
  • 5.5 Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • References
  • 6
  • Impact damage analysis of hybrid composite materials.
  • 6.1 What are hybrid composites?
  • 6.2 Impact tests
  • 6.3 Classification of impact tests
  • 6.4 Low-velocity impact
  • 6.5 Ballistic impact
  • 6.6 Orbital impact
  • 6.7 Damage progression
  • 6.8 Nondestructive testing
  • 6.9 Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • References
  • 7
  • Damage analysis of glass fiber reinforced composites
  • 7.1 Introduction
  • 7.2 Impact testing
  • 7.2.1 Matrix cracking
  • 7.2.2 Delamination
  • 7.2.3 Fiber failure
  • 7.3 Damage analysis using Non-destructive Evaluation (NDE)
  • 7.4 Experimental procedure for damage detection
  • 7.4.1 Dye penetrant
  • 7.4.2 Optical microscope
  • 7.5 Results from the dye penetrant testing
  • 7.6 Optical microscope analysis
  • 7.7 Conclusion
  • Acknowledgement
  • References
  • 8
  • Accelerated testing methodology for long-term life prediction of cellulose-based polymeric composite materials
  • 8.1 Introduction
  • 8.2 Aging mechanisms in polymer composite materials
  • 8.2.1 Effects of moisture and water on polymeric composite materials' performance
  • 8.2.2 Polymer matrix degradation
  • 8.2.3 Fiber degradation
  • 8.3 Life prediction of polymeric composite materials
  • 8.3.1 Life prediction in hostile environments
  • 8.3.1.1 Thermal ageing
  • 8.3.1.2 Temperature-moisture-stress superposition
  • 8.3.1.3 Weathering complexity
  • 8.3.1.4 Ionizing radiation effect
  • 8.3.2 Life prediction from creep behavior
  • 8.3.3 Fatigue life prediction of matrix-dominated polymeric composite materials
  • 8.4 Standard accelerated ageing test methods
  • 8.4.1 Liquid absorption test methods
  • 8.4.2 Thermal stability test
  • 8.4.3 Accelerated testing methods for oxidative aging of polymeric composites
  • 8.5 Polymeric composite cellulose/cement development-case studies
  • 8.5.1 Microcrystalline cellulose
  • 8.5.2 Cellulose nanocrystal/cellulose nanowhisker
  • 8.5.3 Cellulose nanofibril/microfibrillated cellulose.
  • 8.5.4 Lignocellulose
  • 8.6 Fabrication of sand-biocement blocks
  • 8.6.1 Compressive strength of sand-biocement blocks
  • 8.6.2 Density of sand-biocement blocks
  • 8.6.3 Water absorption of sand-biocement blocks
  • 8.7 Results and discussion
  • 8.7.1 Compressive strength
  • 8.7.2 Density
  • 8.7.3 Water absorption
  • 8.8 Conclusions and future perspective
  • Acknowledgments
  • References
  • Further reading
  • 9
  • Evaluation of the effects of decay and weathering in cellulose-reinforced fiber composites
  • 9.1 Introduction
  • 9.2 Degradation on material-based biomass
  • 9.2.1 Biological influences on material-based biomass: an overview
  • 9.2.1.1 Durability
  • 9.2.1.2 Biodeterioration: classification and characterization
  • 9.2.2 Environmental degradation
  • 9.2.1.1 Degradation due to moisture exposure
  • 9.2.1.2 Degradation due to exposure to outdoor environments
  • 9.2.3 Biological degradation
  • 9.3 Degradation by water and soil application
  • 9.3.1 The effects of water immersion degradation on biocomposites
  • 9.3.2 The effects of soil burial degradation on biocomposites
  • 9.4 Degradation by weathering application
  • 9.4.1 The effects of natural weathering degradation on biocomposites
  • 9.4.2 The effects of artificial weathering degradation on biocomposites
  • 9.5 Recent advancements of biocomposite applications for quality and durability service
  • 9.6 Conclusion
  • References
  • 10
  • Long-term strength and durability evaluation of sisal fiber composites
  • 10.1 Introduction
  • 10.2 Experimental investigations
  • 10.2.1 Materials used
  • 10.2.2 Preparation and testing of cementitious mortar composite
  • 10.3 Results and discussion
  • 10.3.1 Compressive strength
  • 10.3.1.1 Strength at 28days (normal age)
  • 10.3.1.2 Strength at later periods (i.e., 56-120days)
  • 10.3.2 Flexural strength
  • 10.3.2.1 Strength at normal age (28days).
  • 10.3.2.2 Strength at later ages (i.e., 56-120days)
  • 10.3.3 Split-tensile strength
  • 10.3.3.1 Strength at normal age (28days)
  • 10.3.3.2 Strength at later ages (i.e., 56-120days)
  • 10.3.4 Impact strength of fly ash-cement mortar and fly ash-cement mortar composite slabs
  • 10.3.4.1 Normal-age behavior (28days)
  • 10.3.4.2 Later-age behavior (56-120days)
  • 10.3.5 Flexural strength of fly ash-cement mortar and fly ash-cement mortar composite slabs
  • 10.3.6 Durability of fly ash-cement mortar and fly ash-cement mortar composite slabs
  • 10.3.6.1 Evaluation of durability based on "Irs"
  • 10.3.6.2 Evaluation of durability based on flexural toughness index (IT)
  • 10.4 Conclusions
  • 10.4.1 Strength behavior of cementitious mortar composites
  • 10.4.2 Impact strength of cementitious mortar composite
  • 10.4.3 Flexural strength of cementitious mortar composites
  • 10.4.4 Durability of sisal fiber cementitious mortar composites
  • References
  • Further reading
  • 11
  • The environmental impact of natural fiber composites through life cycle assessment analysis
  • 11.1 Introduction
  • 11.2 Review of life cycle assessment analysis for natural fiber composites
  • 11.2.1 Framework of life cycle assessment analysis
  • 11.2.1.1 Goal and scope definition
  • 11.2.1.2 Inventory analysis
  • 11.2.1.3 Impact assessment
  • 11.2.1.4 Interpretation
  • 11.2.2 Life cycle assessment analysis of natural fiber composites
  • 11.2.2.1 Production phase
  • 11.2.2.2 Use phase
  • 11.2.2.3 End of life
  • 11.2.3 Summary
  • 11.3 Case study on simplified life cycle assessment analysis for hybrid natural fiber composite automotive components
  • 11.3.1 Anti-roll bar
  • 11.3.2 Hybrid sugar palm/glass fiber-reinforced polyurethane composites
  • 11.3.3 Simplified life cycle assessment analysis of hybrid sugar palm and glass fiber-reinforced polyurethane composite anti-roll bar.